[LIVE AS WE GO] Pritam Singh goes on trial for charges of lying to Parliament

[drkcynic]

Especially ET..

And to think that this character is likely to be our future law minister...

It's a prereq for become MOL these days. Just look at the aura of our current one...

 

[s-ghost]

They haven't even put PS on the stands yet. He seems to be hiding some cards based on his statements in parliament some years back.

Will be interesting.

if i am not wrong, i think the process is after prosecution call all their witnesses, then judge have to decide if there is a case before getting PS side to testify and defend

i might be wrong

 

[charleslee1989]

if i am not wrong, i think the process is after prosecution call all their witnesses, then judge have to decide if there is a case before getting PS side to testify and defend

i might be wrong

You are correct, ah gui...

 

[testart]

RK started it all.

YN and LPY was trying to help RK.. and kena dragged into this mess as a result.

I know RK started all this mess but focus shifted to others and now nobody want to point fingers at her anymore.

So have to deal with those still actively involved in the situation instead. Right now, it’s more about holding the ones who escalated the issue.

When the heat is on them, especially when there were attempts to control the narrative, the spotlight has shifted. Those who stayed in the game and kept the secret are the ones who need to answer for this now.

 

[mryang]

if i am not wrong, i think the process is after prosecution call all their witnesses, then judge have to decide if there is a case before getting PS side to testify and defend

i might be wrong

Still got Low ex WP chief

 

[xdivider]

juz end it today, case closed........

 

[charleslee1989]

So far like no updates leh....

 

[s-ghost]

Judge rejects defence’s application to get full list of Yudhishthra Nathan’s redacted and unredacted messages to COP

Deputy Principal District Judge Luke Tan rejects the defence’s application to get the full set of Mr Yudhishthra Nathan’s unredacted messages from Oct 4 to 12, 2021, and his redacted messages which were submitted to the Committee of Privileges (COP).

The judge says he has carefully examined the documents, and is satisfied that none of the messages are relevant to the guilt or innocence of Pritam Singh.

He adds that the messages do not undermine the prosecution’s case or strengthen the defence’s case in the context of the criminal trial.

As the redactions were done for the purpose of the specific inquiry by the COP, the scope and basis of the redactions are not relevant to the current criminal trial, he says.

The judge also notes that a list of unredacted messages by Mr Nathan, as well as the full list of redacted and unredacted messages by Ms Loh Pei Ying have already been admitted as evidence for the trial.

While there is “no doubt” the credibility of Mr Nathan is an issue, as with the credibility of all witnesses, the messages already submitted as evidence can and already have been used to test the accuracy of the evidence given by the witnesses, including Mr Nathan.

 

[kkkkdllmkkkk]

wow can really case close liao

 

[dubliner1407]

Judge rejects defence’s application to get full list of Yudhishthra Nathan’s redacted and unredacted messages to COP

Deputy Principal District Judge Luke Tan rejects the defence’s application to get the full set of Mr Yudhishthra Nathan’s unredacted messages from Oct 4 to 12, 2021, and his redacted messages which were submitted to the Committee of Privileges (COP).

The judge says he has carefully examined the documents, and is satisfied that none of the messages are relevant to the guilt or innocence of Pritam Singh.

He adds that the messages do not undermine the prosecution’s case or strengthen the defence’s case in the context of the criminal trial.

As the redactions were done for the purpose of the specific inquiry by the COP, the scope and basis of the redactions are not relevant to the current criminal trial, he says.

The judge also notes that a list of unredacted messages by Mr Nathan, as well as the full list of redacted and unredacted messages by Ms Loh Pei Ying have already been admitted as evidence for the trial.

While there is “no doubt” the credibility of Mr Nathan is an issue, as with the credibility of all witnesses, the messages already submitted as evidence can and already have been used to test the accuracy of the evidence given by the witnesses, including Mr Nathan.

Referee kayu! Kelong!

 

[s-ghost]

Defence questions why Yudhishthra Nathan asked Pritam about change in party strategy

Defence lawyer Andre Jumabhoy asks Mr Yudhishthra Nathan if he remembers what he had asked Pritam Singh during the Oct 12, 2021 meeting between himself, Singh and Ms Loh Pei Ying.

Mr Nathan says he asked Singh “how come the party was now getting (Ms Raeesah Khan) to come clean, but cannot remember the question he had asked verbatim.

Mr Jumabhoy asks how many ways that question can be asked, adding that the question seems straightforward. He goes on to ask why Mr Nathan could not remember the question.

Mr Nathan says the meeting took place three years ago.

Mr Jumabhoy asks if that was the first time Mr Nathan had heard Singh mention the change in party strategy and if it was also the first time Mr Nathan and Ms Loh had a chance to question Singh on the new change. He also asks if it was significant.

 

[mryang]

Judge rejects defence’s application to get full list of Yudhishthra Nathan’s redacted and unredacted messages to COP

Deputy Principal District Judge Luke Tan rejects the defence’s application to get the full set of Mr Yudhishthra Nathan’s unredacted messages from Oct 4 to 12, 2021, and his redacted messages which were submitted to the Committee of Privileges (COP).

The judge says he has carefully examined the documents, and is satisfied that none of the messages are relevant to the guilt or innocence of Pritam Singh.

He adds that the messages do not undermine the prosecution’s case or strengthen the defence’s case in the context of the criminal trial.

As the redactions were done for the purpose of the specific inquiry by the COP, the scope and basis of the redactions are not relevant to the current criminal trial, he says.

The judge also notes that a list of unredacted messages by Mr Nathan, as well as the full list of redacted and unredacted messages by Ms Loh Pei Ying have already been admitted as evidence for the trial.

While there is “no doubt” the credibility of Mr Nathan is an issue, as with the credibility of all witnesses, the messages already submitted as evidence can and already have been used to test the accuracy of the evidence given by the witnesses, including Mr Nathan.

What does it mean ? Can kindly explain

 

[powerrr]

Judge rejects defence’s application to get full list of Yudhishthra Nathan’s redacted and unredacted messages to COP
…..
While there is “no doubt” the credibility of Mr Nathan is an issue, as with the credibility of all witnesses, the messages already submitted as evidence can and already have been used to test the accuracy of the evidence given by the witnesses, including Mr Nathan.

What did the cop say about the witnesses in its findings?

 

[GRAVESEED]

Wa ice cream la don't want show the complete messages cause scared COP will kenna taiji right

 

[s-ghost]

 

[EdenHazard]

rejected omo.....

 

[kimsix]

Judge rejects defence’s application to get full list of Yudhishthra Nathan’s redacted and unredacted messages to COP

Deputy Principal District Judge Luke Tan rejects the defence’s application to get the full set of Mr Yudhishthra Nathan’s unredacted messages from Oct 4 to 12, 2021, and his redacted messages which were submitted to the Committee of Privileges (COP).

The judge says he has carefully examined the documents, and is satisfied that none of the messages are relevant to the guilt or innocence of Pritam Singh.

He adds that the messages do not undermine the prosecution’s case or strengthen the defence’s case in the context of the criminal trial.

As the redactions were done for the purpose of the specific inquiry by the COP, the scope and basis of the redactions are not relevant to the current criminal trial, he says.

The judge also notes that a list of unredacted messages by Mr Nathan, as well as the full list of redacted and unredacted messages by Ms Loh Pei Ying have already been admitted as evidence for the trial.

While there is “no doubt” the credibility of Mr Nathan is an issue, as with the credibility of all witnesses, the messages already submitted as evidence can and already have been used to test the accuracy of the evidence given by the witnesses, including Mr Nathan.

VAR no goal.

 

[bohemian-indie]

Got one part he raised his voice at ps right? “Mr Singh!” Even moi watching from my couch also chua tio.

Cos Mr. Singh not singing the same tune as him. He thinks this is classroom, shout then ppl will bow down. Siao.

 

[yperic]

Judge rejects defence’s application to get full list of Yudhishthra Nathan’s redacted and unredacted messages to COP

Deputy Principal District Judge Luke Tan rejects the defence’s application to get the full set of Mr Yudhishthra Nathan’s unredacted messages from Oct 4 to 12, 2021, and his redacted messages which were submitted to the Committee of Privileges (COP).

The judge says he has carefully examined the documents, and is satisfied that none of the messages are relevant to the guilt or innocence of Pritam Singh.

He adds that the messages do not undermine the prosecution’s case nor strengthen the defence’s case in the context of the criminal trial.

As the redactions were done for the purpose of the specific inquiry by the COP, the scope and basis of the redactions are not relevant to the current criminal trial, he says.

The judge also notes that a list of unredacted messages by Mr Nathan, as well as the full list of redacted and unredacted messages by Ms Loh Pei Ying, has already been admitted as evidence for the trial.

While there is “no doubt” the credibility of Mr Nathan is an issue, as with the credibility of all witnesses, the messages already submitted as evidence can and already have been used to test the accuracy of the evidence given by the witnesses, including Mr Nathan.

 

[NTB2DO]

It's a prereq for become MOL these days. Just look at the aura of our current one...

I never like Shan. I find him damn condescending towards opposition members.