[BT] CHT "having a car-lite vision does not mean that our total car population cannot increase"

chickenpiez007

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
22,292
Reaction score
3,156
if really implement distance based charging then pls do away with road tax and coe

no difference from taxi and phv so there should be no barriers to ownership since the entitlement in certificate of entitlement no longer holds true as you're charged on a per use basis

it's the same freaking concept of owning a fridge that charges you money for each time you retrieve something from it

road tax can easily be incorporated into the distance based charge
you know double-dip or even triple-dip???
 

priore

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2020
Messages
2,018
Reaction score
2,219
For a moment, I thought I was delusional that car-lite meant smth else.

But no, car-lite means to reduce dependency on cars on the road. Or at least that's what the gov said, since 2014/2015.


Link 1: https://www.todayonline.com/commentary/becoming-car-lite-society

Quote:
"More must also be done to discourage people from driving...."

Link 2:
https://www.deccanherald.com/world/...hip-to-one-third-down-from-40-in-2013-2758732

Quote:
"Acting Transport Minister Chee Hong Tat told Parliament that it is “not tenable” for Singapore’s vehicle population to keep increasing, 'with one million vehicles, including more than 650,000 cars, now on the roads'."

So yes, car-lite all these while has been talking abt reducing number of cars on the road.

So how did he spin this??
 

Soracak

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2012
Messages
20,306
Reaction score
8,190
giphy.gif
 

xdivider

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2000
Messages
53,787
Reaction score
14,933
Mental gymnastics on a whole new level.

I am truly lost.

Car-lite doesn't mean car population cannot increase. So what does "lite" means? "Lite" during certain times of the day by distance based charging during peak hours if it is introduced?

Secondly, I quote
"Chee replied: “If indeed there is a change, whether it is due to removal of flexi-work arrangements or other reasons, then we will have to respond accordingly using this tool that we have, which is usage-based pricing and ERP 2.0 "

If u need to work, u need to work right?

If company stipulates 8am, 8.30 am etc... How would usage pricing change this?
Making it more expensive doesn't deter anything if you have to report by certain timing right?

It's precisely because start work timing by-and-large is 8am/8.30am/9am that's why there is this thing called "rush hour/peak period" right???

You're not detering anything, you're just making it more expensive to go to work isn't it?

You mean can tell boss "boss, sorry peak period charge extra $10, I go office later".

Are you hearing yourself?

Obviously gov cannot force companies to stagger work start timing or flexi work - you can only encourage.

Cannot solve the problem then at the very least don't add to it - to our cost of living.
he means u can buy the car and keep in carpark as collectible.......
 

Macrossvin

Senior Member
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
1,245
Reaction score
640
Mental gymnastics on a whole new level.

I am truly lost.

Car-lite doesn't mean car population cannot increase. So what does "lite" means? "Lite" during certain times of the day by distance based charging during peak hours if it is introduced?

Secondly, I quote
"Chee replied: “If indeed there is a change, whether it is due to removal of flexi-work arrangements or other reasons, then we will have to respond accordingly using this tool that we have, which is usage-based pricing and ERP 2.0 "

If u need to work, u need to work right?

If company stipulates 8am, 8.30 am etc... How would usage pricing change this?
Making it more expensive doesn't deter anything if you have to report by certain timing right?

It's precisely because start work timing by-and-large is 8am/8.30am/9am that's why there is this thing called "rush hour/peak period" right???

You're not detering anything, you're just making it more expensive to go to work isn't it?

You mean can tell boss "boss, sorry peak period charge extra $10, I go office later".

Are you hearing yourself?

Obviously gov cannot force companies to stagger work start timing or flexi work - you can only encourage.

Cannot solve the problem then at the very least don't add to it - to our cost of living.
I know what they will say..... They will ask u to leave home at 7am..... reach office early..... go exercise....... then start work at 9am...... avoid jam... avoid paying higher travelling fees.... and keep yourself healthy!!!!! Then Dr. Amy Koh will invite u to leave Singapore... if u not happy
 

priore

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2020
Messages
2,018
Reaction score
2,219
I know what they will say..... They will ask u to leave home at 7am..... reach office early..... go exercise....... then start work at 9am...... avoid jam... avoid paying higher travelling fees.... and keep yourself healthy!!!!! Then Dr. Amy Koh will invite u to leave Singapore... if u not happy
And then 7am becomes the peak hour😂
 

Velana

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2007
Messages
14,670
Reaction score
1,896
well at least they won't implement until after the next election.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top