[POLL] Why so many old bird NSmen say M16 very good? Moi think SAR21 way better leh! :(

Which gun ish better?

  • M16

    Votes: 139 70.6%
  • SAR21

    Votes: 58 29.4%

  • Total voters
    197

zyklon86

Banned
Joined
Feb 27, 2004
Messages
5,620
Reaction score
3,843
Not really bah. SAR21 is shorter, easier to move the rifle around during fibua mah. Got scope so the soldier can hit more accurately mah. What's so bad about it? Even the Israelis tavor is built around the same concept.

It will be great if they can cut the weight down bah.
You try use your eye see, then change to scope while you bio the enemy hiding in jungle. Will lose sight one.

It is bad because it is heavy and your sergeant like to steal your gas regulator. Plus the plastic also not so durable.

Like I said, it is not suitable for an army that likes to tekan each other. It is great for turning defence budget to ST revenue and profit.
 

zyklon86

Banned
Joined
Feb 27, 2004
Messages
5,620
Reaction score
3,843
Min-death should donate a few shipments of SAR21 to Ukraine to test the rifle in battle. Then after 1 month of fighting, send feedback form to them to feedback on the rifle.

Yes of course because it will help bring up bottom line of the familee owned businesses.
 

zyklon86

Banned
Joined
Feb 27, 2004
Messages
5,620
Reaction score
3,843
M16 where got good Bro zyklon86? :(

Iron sight so hard to see... :(

Charging handle also so awkward... :(
Iron sight so easy to use. Scope, you go in go out, got blind spot time. That split second, you lost already.

Scope only good for range and behkan people who will anyway miss with or without scope.
 

LoUsyGamER

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
7,359
Reaction score
3,536
So moi enlisted on 2011... :(

During BMT and medic school, we use SAR21 to train... :(

Very good gun, short short so easy to move around, then got scope so very easy to shoot... :(

Some more charging handle by the side so easy to pull... :(

Then moi got posted to Air Force and we are forced to use M16 because we are considered rear units... :(

The M16 so long move around so mafan... :(

Then the iron sight so jialat so hard to shoot... :(

Charging handle also at the back which make it hard to pull... :(

But why so many old bird said M16 better? Is it nostalgia? :(
Which ever that can kana mug and still won't misfire is a good gun. Haha.

The other thing is user problem. Haha. Like gun is long, iron sight, charging handle.

Most of my time is used sar21. One time managed to touch the m16.
 

jadedRomeo

Master Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2015
Messages
2,840
Reaction score
653
I've only used Sar21 twice. The scope is nice though. Very easy to shoot. I think no need to zero? I dunno forgot.

But I still prefer M16. More rugged and reliable.

And yes, using the iron sight is much more satisfying and fast.
 

crimsontactics

Honorary Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
109,824
Reaction score
22,900
Iron sight so easy to use. Scope, you go in go out, got blind spot time. That split second, you lost already.

Scope only good for range and behkan people who will anyway miss with or without scope.
Really meh Bro zyklon86? :(
 

crimsontactics

Honorary Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
109,824
Reaction score
22,900
Which ever that can kana mug and still won't misfire is a good gun. Haha.

The other thing is user problem. Haha. Like gun is long, iron sight, charging handle.

Most of my time is used sar21. One time managed to touch the m16.
SAR21 ish better Bro LoUsyGamER! :(
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top