This is the full context.
I think indranee makes better sense than joteo and don't agree with the joteo gaslight.
Second Minister for Finance Indranee Rajah emphasised that ceasing the use of partially masked NRIC numbers does not mean that masked NRIC numbers should necessarily become unmasked and that this was a misunderstanding.
Highlighting a question in which a reporter had asked if NRICs that were currently masked would become unmasked with the shift, she said: “That's exactly what ACRA thought too, so I'm just trying to illustrate that that’s how the error occurred.”
It can mean
1. Govt released the unmasked nric don't mean that organisation or public should freely release people's unmasked Nric. Nobody should do it.
And/or
2. What ACRA did was a mistake. They heard that masked NRIC should not be used in the future.
And some idiots in the team tot it means to publicise all NRIC unmasked.
She's making a point that ACRA made a mistake. Masked NRIC should not be used also don't mean should unmask all the information and release to everyone.
I think if you separate out their statements and read, got different meaning and stand.