“No one will be left behind because we are all in this together,” said PM Wong in first New Year message

[shikoo]

 

[yesman2978]

PM Wong urges S'poreans to 'blaze a bold path forward' in 1st New Year message​

Blaze a bold path? Like try a new ruling party?

 

[MyWill]

Pls rah. Last time queensway to tiong bahru all hdb. Now mostly condo.

Who move in and who got driven out?? No need say nice things. Look at ground reality pls.

Really missed the days when LW was the only person to insist hdb is 99-leasehold and not yr property.

 

[dgeralds]

PM Wong urges S'poreans to 'blaze a bold path forward' in 1st New Year message​

Blaze a bold path? Like try a new ruling party?

PM will be in for a great surprise in the coming 2025 General Election......

 

[mcylo]

No one will be left behind…..


and we have ministers staying at big bungalows…….yeah right.

 

[FireEmblem]

Yup, if you are no one, you get left behind

 

[mryang]

 

[yesman2978]

Pls rah. Last time queensway to tiong bahru all hdb. Now mostly condo.

Who move in and who got driven out?? No need say nice things. Look at ground reality pls.

Really missed the days when LW was the only person to insist hdb is 99-leasehold and not yr property.

Means sinkies all satki, all upgraded from hdb to condos, thanks to asset appreciation

Confidence for the future! More good times ahead!

Give even stronger mandate, maybe next time can say queensway to tiong bahru mostly GCBs

 

[parchiao]

Cannot leave anyone behind.

Need to continue to carry them forward

in order to continue to tax them.

 

[forests_gump]

Che...I thought he is going to say "“No one will be left behind because we are all in having the same salary like miw"

 

[worldmap777]

after the election you are on your own hahaha.

 

[Lchlch]

No one will be left behind?.

 

[mryang]

分析文章“黄循财总理在新年致辞中呼吁新加坡人‘勇敢前行’” (链接不可用) ，可以发现一些潜在问题：

不一致和矛盾

1. 缺乏具体性: 黄循财总理在讲话中强调新加坡人需要“勇敢前行”，但缺乏关于如何实现这一目标的具体细节。
2. 经济增长与社会福利: 文章提到了新加坡的经济增长，但没有解决潜在的社会福利问题或收入不平等。

模糊不清

1. “勇敢前行”: 这一短语含糊不清，可以有多种解释，难以理解黄循财总理具体提倡哪些行动或政策。
2. “新举措”: 文章提到了新举措，但没有提供关于这些举措的内容或实施方式的信息。

缺陷

1. 缺乏批判性分析: 文章主要介绍了黄循财总理的讲话，没有对其言论进行批判性评估，也没有提供相反的观点。
2. 过度强调经济增长: 文章侧重于新加坡的经济增长，可能忽略了其他重要问题，例如社会福利、教育或环境问题。

模棱两可的词语和煽动性语言

1. “勇敢前行”: 这一短语使用煽情语言来激励行动，但缺乏具体含义。
2. “新举措”: 这一短语含糊不清，可以被视为一种在不提供具体细节的情况下营造积极印象的方式。

数据差异

1. 经济增长率: 文章提到了新加坡的经济增长率，但没有提供往年的可比数据，也没有解释如何计算这一增长率。

宣传和谬误

1. 诉诸情感: 黄循财总理的讲话使用煽情语言来激励行动，而不是提供具体事实或逻辑论证。
2. 缺乏证据: 文章没有提供证据来支持黄循财总理的声明或建议，难以评估其有效性。

 

[lalalalalala]

Lol. Screw the middle class even harder so everyone poor. Then no one gets left behind kym

 

[Medicated Oil]

I laughed every time they throw in the "We, United, together".
And the above words are missing when they start to blame the residents for their failed policies.

 

[yokine3a]

Huh, we are all in this together?

Why my salary is not 1 million like my ministars? Why I am not living in bungalows like my ministars? Why my ministars leave me behind?

 

[mryang]

Here's a summary of the analysis:

# Article Analysis Summary
The article "PM Wong urges S'poreans to 'blaze a bold path forward' in 1st New Year message" lacks clarity, specificity, and critical analysis.

*Key Issues*
1. *Vagueness*: PM Wong's message lacks concrete details and specific actions.
2. *Lack of critical analysis*: The article presents PM Wong's message without evaluating his statements or providing opposing viewpoints.
3. *Overemphasis on economic growth*: The article focuses on economic growth, potentially overlooking other important issues.
4. *Emotional language*: PM Wong's message uses emotional language to inspire action, rather than providing concrete facts or logical arguments.

*Potential Biases*
1. *Pro-government bias*: The article presents a positive view of PM Wong's message without critically evaluating his statements.
2. *Economic growth bias*: The article focuses on economic growth, potentially overlooking other important issues.

 

[Laguna123]

Yes no one will be left behind with the GST/inflation/transportation hikes.

 

[Ethan_]

No one will be left behind…..


and we have ministers staying at big bungalows…….yeah right.

One thing is consistent, that is tax. Probably means no one will be left behind in the heavy taxing. Tax both the rich and the poor. The rich poor gap still there. But rich get richer, poor get poorer.

 

[Smtsai]

Sry nobody wants to be together with you