Boeing Ends DEI Program and FIRES Their Diversity Boss?!

congster2

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
12,782
Reaction score
5,133
DEI should all go to hell
Don't blame dei for this, blame MBAs.

Plus, you all make dei seem like some horrible thing because of the overemphasis on lgbtq. But I know of pp with disabilities, e.g. pp who cannot walk, cannot see, who count on dei to help them gain employment. So I wonder who should go to hell.
 

Mecisteus

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
54,793
Reaction score
11,607

qsgsgs

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2005
Messages
1,644
Reaction score
404
DEI is a form of discrimination against merit. They choose hires based on their race , sex orientation, disablilty, etc instead of merit first. Boeing basically doesn't pick the best people to design ,assemble and QC the planes. That's why their DEI era planes all got issues.

Some airlines in the US have DEI quota for African American pilots and for women. It's your own life on the line. lol
 

FireEmblem

Banned
Joined
Dec 11, 2005
Messages
65,755
Reaction score
28,236
Those that started the DEI program should be sue for homicide of all plane passengers killed when DEI is in place
 

Mr.Chibaboom

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2015
Messages
18,472
Reaction score
9,772
Overall the whole company needs a shaking up, too much skeletons in the closet, lapse in the safety and quality of the planes they are building out.
 

clon33

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2009
Messages
28,925
Reaction score
4,341
Don't blame dei for this, blame MBAs.

Plus, you all make dei seem like some horrible thing because of the overemphasis on lgbtq. But I know of pp with disabilities, e.g. pp who cannot walk, cannot see, who count on dei to help them gain employment. So I wonder who should go to hell.

1)
Based on your logic, do you trust your life with a doctor hired based on DEI policy instead of meritocracy?

Also, do you trust your life sitting on an aeroplane built by engineers hired based on DEI policy instead of meritocracy?

This would tell us whether your argument is based on ethos, pathos, or logos.

2)
Your argument that DEI help disabled people gain employment is a red herring. It is irrelevant whether they are disabled or not. Nobody owes disabled people a living.

There is a reason why the disabled person is not able to enter medical school, or engineering school. They can try to choose a different field like Stephen Hawkings.

But if they are allowed to enroll due to affirmative action, then it is no longer based on meritocracy. The school has to lower their education standards to ensure they can graduate.

If you compare Degree Mills vs schools churning out DEI students. What is the difference? Both are unqualified students using money to buy a degree. Yes or no?

And when you have unqualified graduates hired based on DEI policy, is the company taking on unwanted risk? Such as loss of reputation, negligence lawsuits, and lost of future revenues?
 
Last edited:
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top