[GE2025] Jalan Kayu SMC

B

boringLife-

Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
9,948
Reaction score
1,000
I vote for the one who can let me reach raffles place in 20mins.

10 years ago i go office take 1h, now I pay more but still need take 1h to go office. World class transport f u understand
 
popdod

popdod

Banned
Joined
May 8, 2001
Messages
167,160
Reaction score
34,197
Hope he lose dip dip
send him the message loud & clear.

most likely for his own interest. :(
 
W

weiess

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
16,391
Reaction score
7,751
only a few weeks he suddenly got so much care for jalan kayu smc..

Addressing members of the media after the introduction, Mr Ng said that if he were elected to Parliament, he would want it to be based on his own merit, and not because he was “parachuted into a safer seat”.

"That's quite important to me. My focus right now is really on doing my very best for the residents of Jalan Kayu SMC."
 
jeffprobst

jeffprobst

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2001
Messages
87,543
Reaction score
12,775
I’ve never been a fan of Ng Chee Meng, and for good reason. Not only did he go out of his way to curry favour with his boss and PAP, but he also compromised the very principles a union should stand for. Let’s not forget how he allowed the Union, which is supposed to be an independent voice for workers, to align closely with the incumbent party, blurring the lines between advocacy and politics (i.e. his facebook post by posting PAP pin aside Union logo).

Worse still is the glaring lack of accountability in the botched “almost-sale” of NTUC Income to Alliance. As the Deputy Secretary-General, NCM held a position of significant responsibility, yet he walked away from that fiasco unscathed. No proper fact-checking, no explanation to the public, and no repercussions which is a serious lapse, and yet it was quietly brushed under the rug.

It’s deeply troubling when you compare this to how opposition candidates are treated. Just take the case of Raeesah Khan, the scrutiny she and WP faced was intense, and the consequences swift. If the ruling party truly believes in fairness and accountability, then shouldn’t NCM be held to the same standards? Public trust requires consistency, and turning a blind eye only reinforces the perception of double standards.

He probably in a sure-win SMC, but seriously, hope the voters prove us wrong by continue to reject him until he learn the concept of accountability.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top