When the school is choosing to make ambiguous statements? ROFL... the bullying not just a few days but over a few months!!?
At least the mum had proved that bullying taken place and had tried to report to the school, with screenshot and photos etc. And other than the fact the she herself mention the daughter told her she asked them to shut up, nothing else was mentioned by the school or by the boys parents.
So I'm not sure what kind of fact/opinion are u talking about because if the school was able to have settled the issue, or the boys parents was able to discipline their children, the mum wouldn't have to make a public announcement about it?
Don't forget the fact is that the family even received death threat, from P3 "children"? And despite after initial report of the bully by the parent to the school, the school/teacher did not change the seat of the gal? If the gal herself opt not to change seat then it's her choice but the fact is that she wants to change, the teacher/school did not make it happen?
Firstly, I'm not absolving the boys of any wrongdoings. What I actually want to put across is that when the school says the girl also have done something wrong, things maybe not really simple.
Whether they have settled the issue or not it's not what I can decide, so whatever I say wouldn't change any actions. And that actually would apply to everyone here, unless someone here is actually the school principal of the school or higher ups in MOE and they decide to act on public opinion.
Secondly, since death threats are made, obviously it's a police case by now, although the perpetrators are kids aged 9, and that means the police are not going to take immediate action like earlier posts in the thread regarding minimum age of prosecution. If police case, the school probably also cannot disclose any more details.
Our Minister of Law Shanmugan was also ambiguous in his statement regarding the cyber attacks.
See here -->
https://www.mha.gov.sg/mediaroom/sp...sidelines-of-a-community-event-in-chong-pang/
Question: Mandiant actually linked UNC3886 to China. Are we afraid of some retaliation if we call them out?
Minister: No I think that’s speculative. What Mandiant does is what Mandiant does. As far as the Singapore Government is concerned, we can say we are confident that it is this particular organisation. Who they are linked to, and how they operate, is not something I want to go into.
This is how govt agencies speak to the media. So i think the school is just following govt's SOP.
Lastly, this matter doesn't concern me. So as a passerby, I'll just choose to sit back and watch the drama unfold. No need to get too upset over matters that doesn't concern me. And i suggest everyone here also relax and just watch the drama. No need to go in-depth and then get upset when others don't agree with your POV.
