Fox News - Trump puts BBC: Retract, apologize for 'false, defamatory' doc or face $1 billion lawsuit

[CheapColaCo]

 

[CheapColaCo]

 

[herzberg]

Simply say sorli can siam billion dollar lawsuit, good deal leh

 

[CheapColaCo]

 

[Zinna]

BBC deserves it for peddling fake news like RT or Fox news

 

[cyke69sg]

The laws need to change.
It should be illegal to edit any footage or audio and make it sound like it wasn't cut and pieced together.

Because the words will have different meaning in different context.

If something is too long then they can cut excerpts but it has to made clear it is a cut and notify the audience.

Cannot splice together seamlessly never tell anyone. It seems like the person said it all in one go together. Very different meaning.

With AI generated videos this new law and standard would make it easier for people to know what is real and what is not.

 

[sPacEmAn_sPiFf]

Wow BBC lied to make trump shu shu appear as a baddie ? how many other news networks did the same? no wonder he calls them fakes news..

 

[Shinning_Wolf]

Simply say sorli can siam billion dollar lawsuit, good deal leh

But if they say sorry, they would not receive Bribery money from the left-wing and liberals.

also if the BBC admits means that they also admit that they are working together with the left-wing liberals to get trump canceled and assassinated. Later BBC CEO mysteriously disappear then news reported that the CEO commit suicide by jumping off from a skyscraper building or drown in the river.

 

[Shinning_Wolf]

The laws need to change.
It should be illegal to edit any footage or audio and make it sound like it wasn't cut and pieced together.

Because the words will have different meaning in different context.

If something is too long then they can cut excerpts but it has to made clear it is a cut and notify the audience.

Cannot splice together seamlessly never tell anyone. It seems like the person said it all in one go together. Very different meaning.

With AI generated videos this new law and standard would make it easier for people to know what is real and what is not.

Agree law needs to change.
The woke SJWs and 3rd wave feminist has been doing that for a decade nothing happens to them.
But they will sure 110% cry that such laws against slicing videos illegally is misogynistic, homophobic and bigotry.

 

[PsyClick]

They need pofma

 

[KakiMeow]

hoh seh liao

BBC sure lose because Trump is very important figure

and the speech proven edited

so in the end BBC sure apologise

 

[Insatiable_creat]

All the woke media needs to be sued.. sick of all the propaganda..

 

[Wu-Han Clan]

whether you support trump or nt... cut and edit to change the narrative is bad lah... deserve whtever come their way...

 

[CheapColaCo]

 

[Atrina_Boy]

 

[cyke69sg]

Agree law needs to change.
The woke SJWs and 3rd wave feminist has been doing that for a decade nothing happens to them.
But they will sure 110% cry that such laws against slicing videos illegally is misogynistic, homophobic and bigotry.

Leave the original as is.

It's not like making a movie for entertainment. If it is new reporting it better be original footage unadulterated presented in the original recording.

Otherwise might as well just make movies that is "news".

 

[Shion]

BBC really bold and daring to do such thing so openly

 

[buttbERry]

wa new sagat lai liao

 

[nasfieldjohn]

Amdkland will have pofma laws like us soons

 

[johnsonheng]

Leave the original as is.

It's not like making a movie for entertainment. If it is new reporting it better be original footage unadulterated presented in the original recording.

Otherwise might as well just make movies that is "news".

do you know that uk actually jail people for speaking racist even thou people who post it for a short while and remove before any government issue any statement and they got jail i think for aount 2-3 yrs

i hope the government dun not double standard and let him off even thou they tender.

this stunt bbc does is smelly 3-5 years jail