Is there a reason huai WP field 28 candidates? Not 29? Not 30?

[Rokusaburo]

If all 28 candidates win, then PAP can continue to pwn sinkees everyday for the next 5 years and WP can say they spoke up but cannot do anything

If they field 30 candidates, then PAP cannot continue to pwn sinkees everyday for the next 5 years because WP can speak up and block legislation from PAP at the same time.

And if they field 28 or field 30, they will still be the co driver (since PAP will still be the majority party)

 

[MrSinkie95]

28+5(SPP-DPP)+ suka suka others still can't make up the numbers

 

[chech01]

Less arrogsnt mah

Sent from throne room using GAGT

 

[Rokusaburo]

Less arrogsnt mah

Sent from throne room using GAGT

At the expense of sinkees being pwned by PAP every single day for the next 5 years unopposed?

 

[DLMTE.]

I ish dk... Why ah?

 

[Ninja Bunny]

hey you gotta give some space for other oppos

 

[Shion]

Rokusaburo
Supremacy Member

Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 7,865

 

[Refresh99]

the keyword here is "IF"

 

[batdow]

2 8 huat mah!

 

[repentance]

Wrong, they should field 70 and take over the 2/3 majority, shouldn't they.

 

[Rokusaburo]

the keyword here is "IF"

sinkees never pwn by PAP enough for the last 5 years?

Want to continue to be pwned by PAP for the next 5 years?

If they field 30 candidates, there is a 10% chance they will win all 30 seats

If they field 28 candidates, there is a 0% chance they will win all 30 seats.

Which has higher odds? 10% or 0%?

 

[Rokusaburo]

Rokusaburo
Supremacy Member

Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 7,865

So you disagree that PAP everyday pwn sinkees non stop?

 

[repentance]

sinkees never pwn by PAP enough for the last 5 years?

Want to continue to be pwned by PAP for the next 5 years?

If they field 30 candidates, there is a 10% chance they will win all 30 seats

If they field 28 candidates, there is a 0% chance they will win all 30 seats.

Which has higher odds? 10% or 0%?

Why stop at 30? Why not field all 89 seats?

 

[Rokusaburo]

Why stop at 30? Why not field all 89 seats?

Do tell me, which one is harder to do and require more resources?

Going from 28 candidates to 30 candidates.

Or going from 28 candidates to 89 candidates?

 

[asiafrenz]

So you disagree that PAP everyday pwn sinkees non stop?

you agree PAP everyday pwn sinkees non stop?

 

[zhirong]

+1 in troll bait thread

 

[Refresh99]

sinkees never pwn by PAP enough for the last 5 years?

Want to continue to be pwned by PAP for the next 5 years?

If they field 30 candidates, there is a 10% chance they will win all 30 seats

If they field 28 candidates, there is a 0% chance they will win all 30 seats.

Which has higher odds? 10% or 0%?

Can win 28 seats then say la...Singapore so many "smart" people

 

[Rokusaburo]

you agree PAP everyday pwn sinkees non stop?

Yes PAP everyday pwn sinkees non stop.

That's why in order to stop them pwning sinkees everyday, all WP need to do is to field 2 more candidates, and work to get all 30 elected.

Then PAP can no longer pwn sinkees everyday non stop (at least for the next 5 years)

Imagine if PAP come up with some unfair legislation to pwn sinkees, WP can immediately block it and it will no longer be applicable to Singapore

 

[repentance]

Do tell me, which one is harder to do and require more resources?

Going from 28 candidates to 30 candidates.

Or going from 28 candidates to 89 candidates?

Oh, so now you are considering the constraints and limitations.

 

[yummie]

he doesn't want to make up the nos for fear of being exposed.