<160 forum>Spare a thought before denying unvaccinated staff entry to workplace

Masaharu

Suspended
Joined
Apr 2, 2021
Messages
6,333
Reaction score
4,187
https://www.straitstimes.com/opinio...denying-unvaccinated-staff-entry-to-workplace
I refer to the announcement by the multi-ministry task force tackling Covid-19 that unvaccinated people may not be allowed back to the workplace despite having a negative Covid-19 test result (Unvaccinated people may not be allowed back to workplace despite negative test result: Wong, Dec 15).

If this concession is removed, unvaccinated employees denied entry to their workplaces will probably have to resign. This makes such workers unemployable in workplaces which need them to be on-site.

The family members of unvaccinated workers would also be affected by the loss of income.


Employers might also suffer as they would have to let go of unvaccinated employees who may be excellent workers. The loss of such workers might affect business operations and cause recruitment problems for employers in this challenging business landscape.

The unvaccinated already face restrictions, including denial of entry to shopping malls, having to take additional antigen rapid tests and the mandatory pre-event testing for entry into workplaces come Jan 1.

Placing restrictions to protect the unvaccinated is one thing, but making it difficult for unvaccinated people to earn a living is another. Not every unvaccinated person can work from home.



Benjamin Ng C.K.
 

Medicated Oil

Honorary Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
146,443
Reaction score
60,064
page_1.jpg


So, what happened to the above slogan last year ?
They ruin our life, remove our jobs and destroy our future ?
Or OUR - was referring to all of them instead ?
 

Perisher

Greater Supremacy Member
Deluxe Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
84,184
Reaction score
10,104
their reasons is quite nonsense.
If it's to protect unvax, then all the vax can't even stay with the unvax at home.
If it's to prevent spread, the unvax are perfectly healthy people to begin with.
If it's to do with keeping ICU capacity in check, you mean Sg can't even tahan 2%(most cases are mild) of the less than 6% unvax who might need to go ICU?
 

upslorry

Banned
Joined
Dec 16, 2006
Messages
15,649
Reaction score
1,821
3% unvaccinated only, minus those who dont need to work or over age, left less than 1%
you think they care?



oh wait....... those not boosted considered unvaxed. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

tokiya

Banned
Joined
Nov 25, 2005
Messages
13,088
Reaction score
8,992
page_1.jpg


So, what happened to the above slogan last year ?
They ruin our life, remove our jobs and destroy our future ?
Or OUR - was referring to all of them instead ?

Only Vaxxed allowed to hold jobs.

Unvaxxed better become unemployed and die nobody cares.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top