BBCWatcher
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2010
- Messages
- 24,151
- Reaction score
- 5,346
That's an interesting hypothesis.To be fair also, Blackrock probably has probably more than 10x assets under management.
First of all, if that problem exists, it shouldn't be the financial consumer's burden to bear. If you're too small to be cost-efficient and to deliver good value to the investor, then the investor should find somebody who is more cost-efficient.
But does this problem exist for this particular unit trust? Do they have a critical mass to support a reasonable management fee, pay their fund managers handsomely, and still earn a nice profit? This particular unit trust is managed by Eastspring Investments. Who is Eastspring? A fully owned subsidiary of Prudential plc, the mega insurance and financial company. This is not the runt of the financial world.
So no, I don't think this hypothesis explains a 1.7+% management fee. Which is at least US$2.89 billion in gross fee revenue if that's the average fee they charge their clients. They're not poor, the fund managers that is.
Last edited: