ondooy
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2012
- Messages
- 11,019
- Reaction score
- 1,219
Source/
With almost eight years of separation, it should be unsurprising to find that the newer processor is between 6 and 12 times faster -- some folks might have even expected bigger gains. This is certainly true when looking at the four year gap between the Core i5-760 and Core i5-4690K.
The 4690K is just 32% faster than the 760 in Excel, 25% faster in 7-Zip and just 17% on average when comparing gaming performance. That said, the 4690K enjoys a 60% performance advantage in Illustrator CC, while it's 90% faster when testing with Photoshop CC and 111% faster with HandBrake.
The two year gap between the Sandy Bridge and Haswell architecture shows reasonable gains at times, but for the most part the difference is minimal.
For example, the Core i5-4690K is 20% faster on average when comparing application performance and only 11% faster when comparing the encoding results (keep in mind that it's clocked a mere 6% higher). In gaming tests, virtually nothing separates the two processors.
Another perspective to consider between the Core 2 Duo E6600 and Core i7-4790K is that the 6 - 12x performance gain is delivered while consuming no extra power. On a similarly impressive note, the Pentium G3220 often matched or even beat the Core 2 Quad Q9650 while consuming almost half as much power.



