Comparing 10 years of Intel CPU's

ondooy

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2012
Messages
11,019
Reaction score
1,219
Source/

Memory_01.png

Synthetic_01.png

Application_02.png

Encoding_01.png

Encoding_04.png

Gaming_05.png

Power_01.png



With almost eight years of separation, it should be unsurprising to find that the newer processor is between 6 and 12 times faster -- some folks might have even expected bigger gains. This is certainly true when looking at the four year gap between the Core i5-760 and Core i5-4690K.

The 4690K is just 32% faster than the 760 in Excel, 25% faster in 7-Zip and just 17% on average when comparing gaming performance. That said, the 4690K enjoys a 60% performance advantage in Illustrator CC, while it's 90% faster when testing with Photoshop CC and 111% faster with HandBrake.

The two year gap between the Sandy Bridge and Haswell architecture shows reasonable gains at times, but for the most part the difference is minimal.

For example, the Core i5-4690K is 20% faster on average when comparing application performance and only 11% faster when comparing the encoding results (keep in mind that it's clocked a mere 6% higher). In gaming tests, virtually nothing separates the two processors.

Another perspective to consider between the Core 2 Duo E6600 and Core i7-4790K is that the 6 - 12x performance gain is delivered while consuming no extra power. On a similarly impressive note, the Pentium G3220 often matched or even beat the Core 2 Quad Q9650 while consuming almost half as much power.
 

ragnarok95

Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
124,642
Reaction score
6,019
Your above charts make my 2600K damn IMBA @ 4Ghz. :o
 

Gattberserk

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
10,661
Reaction score
933
Its almost 4 years difference between haswell refresh and SB. What a letdown.


The shrink in performance jump between the first 4 years and later 4 years is so obvious.
 

MoneyFace =p

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2010
Messages
35,370
Reaction score
391
Its almost 4 years difference between haswell refresh and SB. What a letdown.


The shrink in performance jump between the first 4 years and later 4 years is so obvious.
I have more or less accepted that clock for clock won't have much improvements.

Just hoped we don't get trolled further by the Israelis in terms of power consumption and overclockability.

Just look that how Haswell versus Ivy Bridge. :s22:
 

Gattberserk

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
10,661
Reaction score
933
I have more or less accepted that clock for clock won't have much improvements.

Just hoped we don't get trolled further by the Israelis in terms of power consumption and overclockability.

Just look that how Haswell versus Ivy Bridge. :s22:

The israelis could have come out with a performance breakthrough but who knows intel clamped it down completely and decided to only use it after cannon lake, or slowly release the new architecture bit by bit. We all knew who to blame for this.
 

MoneyFace =p

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2010
Messages
35,370
Reaction score
391
The israelis could have come out with a performance breakthrough but who knows intel clamped it down completely and decided to only use it after cannon lake, or slowly release the new architecture bit by bit. We all knew who to blame for this.
Probably Kaby Lake is aimed at this purpose. Prepping for war.... :s8:
 

micheloving

Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2009
Messages
7,354
Reaction score
1
I have more or less accepted that clock for clock won't have much improvements.

Just hoped we don't get trolled further by the Israelis in terms of power consumption and overclockability.

Just look that how Haswell versus Ivy Bridge. :s22:

They focusing on mobile cpu ...just look at how powerful atom z3000 series is now compared to 1-2 year ago?


Desktop is more or less abandoned .

Still have to wait like 2-3 years before ddr 4 becomes really affordable , might as well upgrade then.
 
Last edited:

deepblue_82

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2007
Messages
18,559
Reaction score
2,076
should i wait for skylake before buying a new gaming rig ?

no need la.. u can wait ma.. ur rig is not that old.. still least a i5..
u should upgrade ur ram... ur using 64bit and 4gb ram? at least 6gb or 8 for 64bit..
 
Last edited:

MoneyFace =p

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2010
Messages
35,370
Reaction score
391
They focusing on mobile cpu ...just look at how powerful atom z3000 series is now compared to 1-2 year ago?


Desktop is more or less abandoned .

Still have to wait like 3-4 years before ddr 4 becomes affordable .
Previous gens Atom are simply too cui... :s13:
 

Gattberserk

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
10,661
Reaction score
933
Probably Kaby Lake is aimed at this purpose. Prepping for war.... :s8:

Errr no, AMD Zen has yet to prove itself, and that is absolutely true seeing how they over hype their product again and again.


Its probably a trumph card that may not see the light of the day until AMD proved themselves at the CPU department
 

swathe

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2001
Messages
12,468
Reaction score
2,495
Would upgrading from Sandy to Skylake see much of a difference?
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top