[Consolidated] [SAGA] Sylvia Chan + NOC

[tongbuaydiao]

We need total lockdown.

Lockdown NOC

 

[Yuripa]

i damn envy of him seriously. we can be kbw here but hes the real winner. he upgraded from shu qi to someone more cuter and wet

Did you just compare sc with sq?!!

You're a ******* troll right


+1 EDMWER

 

[m@maboi]

from being the badass and now after lawyer engagement, become the victim of abuse.

 

[WakaaWakaa]

Out of curiosity as not versed in this, with regards to the leaking of screenshots/messages etc, how is this different from the Dee Kosh incident? Apart from the obvious criminal element to the latter, does this mean everything once done and dusted, he could “sue” those who “leaked” the incriminating messages for loss of sponsors etc? Considering they were supposedly meant to be “private” too no?

I’m just trying to understand where the line is drawn in terms of privacy and calling out someone for doing something wrong through leaking private messages/audios. Where one party is applauded for doing the right thing whilst one is facing the threat of being sued for supposed defamation.

 

[s-ghost]

Ohhhh....here are some informations....

There are TWO entities relates to NOC:

1. NOC which is a sole prop, which Ryan is the sole prop
2. NOC Pte Ltd where till today, Ryan is the managing directors but Sylvia is the majority shareholder;
Paid up capital - $10,000
Number of shares -
Sylvia 5100
Ryan 4900

So....if ryan say he no longer managements liao....maybe yet to reflects officially ba......but ya la, officially Sylvia is majority shareholder by a bit....

my guess is 1) is a company registered by Ryan when they first started, and when they expanded, they registered 2)

 

[walceab]

Did you just compare sc with sq?!!

You're a ******* troll right


+1 EDMWER

The mouth is the same isn’t it? Sausage lips

 

[Yuripa]

Out of curiosity as not versed in this, with regards to the leaking of screenshots/messages etc, how is this different from the Dee Kosh incident? Apart from the obvious criminal element to the latter, does this mean everything once done and dusted, he could “sue” those who “leaked” the incriminating messages for loss of sponsors etc? Considering they were supposedly meant to be “private” too no?
I’m just trying to understand where the line is drawn in terms of privacy and calling out someone for doing something wrong through leaking private messages/audios. Where one party is applauded for doing the right thing whilst one is facing the threat of being sued for supposed defamation.

One is a criminal offence and one isn't.

One lawyer stop being his lawyer and I suppose the other got confidence in winning a defamation lawsuit.

You never see tt durai case? He sue and win all the small fries but that cockster try to sue st end up go jail instead lol




+1 EDMWER

 

[ashethen]

Out of curiosity as not versed in this, with regards to the leaking of screenshots/messages etc, how is this different from the Dee Kosh incident? Apart from the obvious criminal element to the latter, does this mean everything once done and dusted, he could “sue” those who “leaked” the incriminating messages for loss of sponsors etc? Considering they were supposedly meant to be “private” too no?

I’m just trying to understand where the line is drawn in terms of privacy and calling out someone for doing something wrong through leaking private messages/audios. Where one party is applauded for doing the right thing whilst one is facing the threat of being sued for supposed defamation.

Leaking private messages & republishing it isn't a crime I think, but you can get sued for it. Not sure if Sylvia is also suing the original leakers also.

Phone numbers and address also not leaked out, don't think it breached any POHA laws. Not sure what crime the lawyers/Sylvia want to report chicken rice to the police for

 

[approx]

The other office aka sylvia house..

their new shophouse office so atas sia!

 

[iamverysmart]

my guess is 1) is a company registered by Ryan when they first started, and when they expanded, they registered 2)

Ya correct lor….but now ryan 置身事外….he is managing director deh….how to bochup…unless now he officially removes himself completely….

but like that is means noc as good as empty shell nia

 

[s-ghost]

Ya correct lor….but now ryan 置身事外….he is managing director deh….how to bochup…unless now he officially removes himself completely….

but like that is means noc as good as empty shell nia

they go down also bo lang hiew

 

[yperic]

However, in a post late Monday night, the Instagram user Sgcickenrice put up a series of images that showed that it had received a letter from Edmond Pereira Law Corporation, which was acting on behalf of Night Owl Cinematics.

The letter demanded the user to “cease and desist” from making any further allegations against Ms Chan or Night Owl Cinematics and its employees on social media platforms such as TikTok, Twitter and Instagram.

It added that it may proceed with legal proceedings if the user fails to acknowledge in writing that it will comply with the orders by 10am on Tuesday.

TODAY has sought comments from the user on whether he or she intends to do so.

Separately, Mr Tan, the firm’s co-founder, said in an email to TODAY that he has resigned as its director, though Night Owl Cinematics is still formalising his resignation.

Nevertheless, he said he has not been involved in the management of the company since earlier this year.

“I am leaving any response to be handled by the company and will not make any further comment,” he said.

TODAY also sought comments from both former and current employees of Night Owl Cinematics, but they did not respond.

https://www.todayonline.com/singapo...oyee-abuse-allegations-massive-smear-campaign

 

[charsiewfan]

The chicken rice run road already?

 

[Xiao Sinkie]

However, in a post late Monday night, the Instagram user Sgcickenrice put up a series of images that showed that it had received a letter from Edmond Pereira Law Corporation, which was acting on behalf of Night Owl Cinematics.

The letter demanded the user to “cease and desist” from making any further allegations against Ms Chan or Night Owl Cinematics and its employees on social media platforms such as TikTok, Twitter and Instagram.

It added that it may proceed with legal proceedings if the user fails to acknowledge in writing that it will comply with the orders by 10am on Tuesday.

TODAY has sought comments from the user on whether he or she intends to do so.

Separately, Mr Tan, the firm’s co-founder, said in an email to TODAY that he has resigned as its director, though Night Owl Cinematics is still formalising his resignation.

Nevertheless, he said he has not been involved in the management of the company since earlier this year.

“I am leaving any response to be handled by the company and will not make any further comment,” he said.

TODAY also sought comments from both former and current employees of Night Owl Cinematics, but they did not respond.

https://www.todayonline.com/singapo...oyee-abuse-allegations-massive-smear-campaign

So xiguayong was just a figurehead ah?

 

[kl2015]

I think he is the one holding 49% or lesser ownership now

Sylvia bringing down NOC with her

employees also gonna be affected if NOC’s advertisers pull out

nahhh let them be
enjoy the show

 

[Wu-Han Clan]

The chicken rice run road already?

is he nw change to char siew??? is it you????

 

[kl2015]

i think will work for both parties benefit if he can take back NOC since NOC got ready subscriber base

NOC valuation would be already affected since the major influencers are gone, advertisers might run road too.

For now, people dont want to see sylvia at the helm.

if i were ryan i would just quickly lowball sylvia gaogao for her shares

difficult to bring down sylvia

unless she have scandal

(not money/crime related)

 

[The_King]

LOL

just throw away the letter la.

this 1 just to scare people only la.

really throw face and make things worst only

ya, only these need to worry. writ of summons + Statement of claim

 

[saycheese]

their new shophouse office so atas sia!

buy property using coy account jin satki!

 

[ashethen]

this company delay formalizing so many of its staff resignations. why har? machiam rejecting their resignations.

this isn't allowed according to MOM laws right?