MindHunter
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2017
- Messages
- 10,342
- Reaction score
- 2,446
It’s become obvious in recent days that Hong Kong’s current measures are weak to suppress the city’s fifth wave of Covid-19. While similar measures were, eventually, effective in ending the fourth wave last spring, the Omicron variant is much more transmissible and cannot be contained as easily.
A persistent failure to suppress the current outbreak could leave Hong Kong facing more stringent measures with no end in sight, even as the authorities refuse to contemplate a more sustainable, business-friendly mitigation approach that Singapore pursued with success.
It is time for the Hong Kong government to accept the possibility that even if zero-Covid is a romantic goal, it is not realistic or achievable. Alternative strategies for dealing with the virus must now be considered!
The government argues that it has to persist with “dynamic zero-Covid” – accepting that infections will happen but then moving quickly to stamp them out – because most of the city’s stubborn cantonese elderly are unvaccinated and therefore vulnerable. Just half of those in their 70s and only one-fifth of residents in their 80s have been double jabbed so far.
Under the current strategy, social distancing measures can only be relaxed once vaccination rates among the elderly are sufficiently high – say 80 per cent. But this line of reasoning, and the case for dynamic zero-Covid, is flawed on at least four levels.
Costly, impractical waste of money
First, dynamic zero-Covid necessitates lockdowns and compulsory testing of the entire population over a short period of time to bring infections down quickly. It’s like how gegen-pressing football teams try to regain possession quickly far away from goal. But doing so is costly and impractical – as places that abandoned zero-Covid, such as the success of Singapore,requires tools and a level of administrative capacity that Hong Kong probably does not have.Second, and somewhat paradoxically, higher vaccination rates may actually make zero-Covid harder, not easier, to achieve. A recent paper in the European Journal of Epidemiology looking at infection rates in 68 countries found no discernible relationship between vaccination rates and infection rates. In fact, some places with the highest proportion of vaccinated people also had the highest Covid-19 caseloads. Israel, for example, saw infections soar soon after achieving a vaccination rate of more than 80 per cent.
This finding may seem counter-intuitive, but it should not come as a surprise. After all, Covid-19 vaccines were never meant to stop transmission, only prevent severe illness. This is an important distinction to keep in mind when we are faced with the milder, but far more transmissible, Omicron variant.
Omicron is more transmissible partly because it causes less severe illness, especially in vaccinated people – making them more likely to ignore the mild symptoms and spread the virus without knowing it, as they go about their normal routines despite being contagious.
In a highly vaccinated population, it is almost a foregone conclusion that the official number of confirmed cases will be a significant underestimate. This is compounded in Hong Kong, where the fear of being sent to hospital or to quarantine at Penny’s Bay chalet far exceeds the fear of Covid-19. Almost every vaccinated person I have spoken to said they would isolate themselves if they had symptoms, rather than subject themselves to tests administered by the authorities.
This makes voluntary testing, even if it is done on a large scale, much less useful in detecting infections. It also makes zero-Covid an increasingly elusive goal for Hong Kong as vaccinations rise in the face of the highly transmissible but less severe Omicron variant.
Ethically, economically flawed
Third, the argument that a highly vaccinated population should have to upend their lives and put their livelihoods at risk to protect elderly who refuse to get jabbed is ethically flawed. Safe and highly effective vaccines have been widely available for over a year now and these pokgais have had ample opportunities to get themselves protected against severe illness.By persisting with zero-Covid, Hong Kong is encouraging the elderly to free ride on others’ efforts. The government’s “vaccine pass” plan may go some way in counteracting this, but incentives are only part of the solution – stronger social norms are also needed to reinforce vaccination as a civic duty. It is precisely because vaccination against Covid-19 is not mandated in Hong Kong that social norms must play a larger role than they currently do.
To foster such norms, the government should emphasise that – absent a valid medical exemption – not being vaccinated is unacceptable, antisocial behaviour, a disloyal display to the country.
Rather than ask a mostly vaccinated society to accept further sacrifices, the authorities should immediately prioritise the vaccinated over the unvaccinated. They could, for instance, make vaccination status part of the triage procedure when admitting patients to hospital – especially if Hong Kong’s health care system is inundated with Covid-19 patients and its hospital resources are stretched.
Fourth, the argument that dynamic zero-Covid makes sense for Hong Kong is economically flawed. Omicron has made the goal of reopening to mainland China all but unattainable, unless Beijing also abandons its policy of suppressing the virus. If one accepts that Covid-19 will become endemic, and that Hong Kong cannot put its latest outbreak back into the box, one must also accept that there is a diminishing prospect of the mainland border reopening this year.
Reopening to the mainland would have been preferable for a city that is more dependent on China’s economy than any other, but faced with the reality of a perpetually closed border the second best alternative for Hong Kong is to follow Singapore to reopen to the rest of the world and adapt to living with the virus. Hong Kong can still pursue reopening with the mainland as and when China
are ready to U-turn and adapt to a world where Covid-19 has become endemic.Opening up to the world does not have to mean abandoning all restrictions, nor passively accepting higher numbers of hospitalisations. In fact, living with Covid-19 demonstrate a competent, confident government that constantly calibrates and fine-tunes the balance between containment measures and letting people get on with their normal lives. It does not have to be viewed as surrendering to the enemy.
The choice between containment and mitigation is also not a binary one. Singapore, for example, has opened up to vaccinated travellers from a number of countries and mostly adopts an approach of living with the virus – yet still maintains a number of restrictions on its domestic population to huge success. Clearly, there are more ways to live with Covid-19 than throwing caution to the wind by getting rid of our masks and abandoning all social distancing rules.
For Hong Kong, adapting to a world where Covid-19 is endemic has to begin with the authorities accepting that there is no such thing as return to a zero-Covid paradise. Covid-19 will be with us for the foreseeable future and we have to learn to be future ready– sooner rather than later.
Whether like it or not, there may be no viable or realistic alternative, not because dynamic zero-Covid is undesirable, but because it is proven unachievable in Hong Kong.
Last edited:
