GE2015: The truth is out.....

runforyourlife

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
47,253
Reaction score
5,238
I think you got it wrong, TS. 70% is the intelligent ones and 30% is the daft ones. Why care for Singapore? We are in good hands and we are lucky that we have a very experienced and capable party to rule Singapore.

IMO, the 30% (Including me) was the ones sleeping and need to wake up. 70% already realized that 人不为己,天诛地灭. So don't pity others, it's a every man for himself era now. :)

Yea! No point being gracious or compassionate. Doesn't translate to dollar and cents. As long policies need me to help the poor, sorry not gonna support them! I have e intention though.

Daft 30%! 70% the best!

One party system the best. No disturbing and can work on policies!
 

satayxp

Banned
Joined
May 10, 2004
Messages
151,806
Reaction score
5,152
the 70% want this ..they deserve it , next time I don't want to hear the 70% complain.
 

GenesisX

High Honorary Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2001
Messages
152,461
Reaction score
52
I think some pple loses faith with oppositions because they are too quiet in Parliament. Why vote them in if all they do is sit there and kenna shoot left right centre everyday and do nothing?...:(
 

runforyourlife

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
47,253
Reaction score
5,238
I think some pple loses faith with oppositions because they are too quiet in Parliament. Why vote them in if all they do is sit there and kenna shoot left right centre everyday and do nothing?...:(

Are you expressing your guilt?

Why say some?

Be proud of your choice! Don't find excuses now. You are in a grp of intelligent ppl whom are earning tons and ain't affected by any policy! The rest does t matter to u bro. That's the way we should look forward.
 

Airplane88

Master Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
3,475
Reaction score
783
I think you got it wrong, TS. 70% is the intelligent ones and 30% is the daft ones. Why care for Singapore? We are in good hands and we are lucky that we have a very experienced and capable party to rule Singapore.

IMO, the 30% (Including me) was the ones sleeping and need to wake up. 70% already realized that 人不为己,天诛地灭. So don't pity others, it's a every man for himself era now. :)

Would it come to a day 100% of the citizens vote the ruling party then everyone as accordingly is 'intelligent'? The SG HUAT big big!
 

Novak2016

Banned
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
3,458
Reaction score
0
I do not wish to hear anymore complaints!!! :mad:

5Je93Kd.jpg
 

IDevil

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2005
Messages
21,444
Reaction score
49
Ge2015 is last chance liao

Next ge, got alot of new citizens converted from ft.

Totally no chance.

Anyway, if one doesnt agree with gov direction, be smart and work towards an alternative lor.

Complaining is useless.
 

BuiBui EDMWer

Banned
Joined
May 11, 2014
Messages
24,171
Reaction score
3
30% of sinkaporeans are from wealthy background and they simply do not care hence pap is their default choice.

10% are stingy business owners who want the best from gahmen through PIC grants but give only ikan bilis to their employees and brag as if they gave great white sharks to their employees.

20% are afraid of changes. kpkb about pap but still vote for pap.

10% are new citizens. everyday praise and worship pap for opening legs big big for them to come in hoot sgd. dont be surprised when you see their house has an alter and incest offered to pap.
 
Last edited:

questsohai

Banned
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
20,984
Reaction score
2,232
Voters have spoken. So be it. No point analyzing what could've been this or that. Time to move on.
In a way, am glad that people still endorse the PAP brand. Those voters (the strawberry generation) who voted for this, please prepare for hard truth.

Now where is that Scandinavian candidate's cv I want to look again? Im sure he don't have baggages like NS liability and CPF, plus he can work harder & play harder than most locals here.
 

Lord84

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
1,897
Reaction score
11
http://www.straitstimes.com/singapo...ed-care-centres-likely-to-start-charging-more

School-based care centres in Singapore likely to start charging more

SINGAPORE - After-school care services in primary schools are safer, cheaper and more in tune with the school curriculum than those provided by care centres outside schools, but parents will likely have to pay more for them.

School-based student care centres, which offer services such as meals, homework supervision and, in some cases, tuition, are in demand as they are cheaper alternatives to community-based centres typically located in bomb shelters and at the void decks of Housing Board blocks.

School-based centres, run by voluntary welfare organisations or commercial operators, generally charge less than $300 a month, while those outside schools can charge up to $500 a month.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top