actually i wanna make a few points.
true, ilp sarks ttm. but 15 years back, would your dad invest in an ETF?
the older and less financial savvy generation would be better off with an ilp than nothing.
on the contrary, if your dad's fren had recommended him to buy term invest etf, he might be skeptical about the no-cash-value part and not get any insurance at all.
but this is definitely a good case study to show and educate whoever sees this on this forum or even share it with your friends.
my 2 maos.
dont flame moi.
agree. ETFs weren't that common or well established in SG back then.
and 10-15 years ago being a fresh grad I fell for the idea of getting something back at the end of 20-25 years. probably wouldn't have bothered to buy term insurance because there's no cash value attached.
of course, now that I know it's actually going to cost me more to get an ILP than BTIR, I strongly discourage anyone from getting ILP and I'm in the process of replacing my ILP coverage with term and putting the proceeds into a diversified portfolio of ETFs.