Lump - Sum Vs DCA ?

Mecisteus

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
55,067
Reaction score
11,795
If the apple fall to $9.50, I sell them. I keep all my cash. When the apple falls to $2, I buy back them back again. When the apples rise to $5, I'm already in profit. I don't have to wait until the apples to reach $10 to be in profit and I don't lock up my capital for unnecessary risk.

Wrong!

If you know apple is going to fall to $2, you should leverage to the max and short at $9. You don't just sell.
 

peterchan75

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2003
Messages
6,719
Reaction score
529
How about this strategy....
IF I know the stock is a winner... lump sum.
IF I know the stock is a loser... DCA... nah.. I won't touch it.

I tell you solemnly... during decision time(buy or sell), it's a lonely place with fingers on the keyboard and eyes glue to the screen. :D
 

fulat1

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2018
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I notice there is something not clearly defined here.
are we talking about stock or etf?
if etf probably of course i will probably do a dca..but if it's a stock, it will be difficult to do a dca as i don't even know whether the company will survive 10 - 11 years..
 

Mecisteus

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
55,067
Reaction score
11,795
I notice there is something not clearly defined here.
are we talking about stock or etf?
if etf probably of course i will probably do a dca..but if it's a stock, it will be difficult to do a dca as i don't even know whether the company will survive 10 - 11 years..

It applies to both.

When you buy a stock, you believe the company will survive perpetually or will be acquired. If a company is going to bankrupt on year X, then the share price will be depressed now.
 

limster

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2000
Messages
12,926
Reaction score
3,899
I average down ES3(STF ETF) when it was at $2.2 to $1.7. Fear kept me out when it was at $1.5. What is the chance of 30 stocks going bust together ? I won't do it on a single stock. I won't put all my money on ES3 either. Because the Japan bear market lasted more then 20 years.

I also averaged down all the way to the bottom. I ran out of cash but fortunately i had CPF-OA.

I also had CPF-SA and I used a little bit for First State Bridge near the bottom.
 

limster

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2000
Messages
12,926
Reaction score
3,899
Easy to say then done.

You forgot than human beings are emotional creatures.

If you brought at $10 and see the price drop to $2, how many of you still dare to buy at $2.

Many will hold at $10 and hope that the price would goes back up $10 in the long run.

Worst are those that sell at $2 out of fear.

I don't do DCA. I'll exit at $9.50 and buy all at $2.


If the company is not making any money, then of course there is fear.
If the company is profitable, I got no worries. I buy more, while remaining diversified.

Comfort Delgro, Singtel are some examples. Price crash, but still profitable and paying dividends. I will buy more. The stock price not relevant to me since my holding period for shares is forever. I am more interested in whether it is profitable and can pay dividend. =:p
 

alexchia01

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
1,941
Reaction score
3
If the company is not making any money, then of course there is fear.
If the company is profitable, I got no worries. I buy more, while remaining diversified.

Comfort Delgro, Singtel are some examples. Price crash, but still profitable and paying dividends. I will buy more. The stock price not relevant to me since my holding period for shares is forever. I am more interested in whether it is profitable and can pay dividend. =:p

If you are like Warren Buffett, has bottomless pocket, yes, you can do this.

However, how many of us has unlimited cash to continue buy as the price falls lower.

Singtel is $3.35 now. If you start doing DCA now. If the market crashes, it falls to $1 and stay there for the next 10 years, you'll take over 10 years to recover.

I rather sell at $3, wait for it to goes to $1 and buy at $1. By doing is, I'll be in profit once the price starts to rise. This is a much efficient way of investing your money than doing DCA.
 

limster

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2000
Messages
12,926
Reaction score
3,899
If you are like Warren Buffett, has bottomless pocket, yes, you can do this.

However, how many of us has unlimited cash to continue buy as the price falls lower.

Singtel is $3.35 now. If you start doing DCA now. If the market crashes, it falls to $1 and stay there for the next 10 years, you'll take over 10 years to recover.

I rather sell at $3, wait for it to goes to $1 and buy at $1. By doing is, I'll be in profit once the price starts to rise. This is a much efficient way of investing your money than doing DCA.


Every month most investors earn some salary unless they are 'full-time investors' Some of this salary can be used for DCA. No need unlimited cash, all you need is regular monthly income to continue to average downwards.

If i can collect dividends , i got no problem. I bought the shares to collect dividends, not for capital gain.

Earnings are more important to me than share price. Got to look at earnings quality and sustainability of dividend. I wouldn't have bought Noble, let alone averaged down . But Singtel, Sembcorp, CDG, I look at the fundamentals, I'm ok to average down.

Definitely your return will be higher if you sell high and buy low. But not everyone can do that. :s13:
 

buaytuckchek

Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2017
Messages
227
Reaction score
18
Came across an interesting video explaining the “bug” in Dollar Cost Averaging (DCA). In the video, it explained the idea of DCA and why many thinks it is a good means to mitigate risk instead of lump sum purchase.

The problem of DCA comes when the period of investment gets longer, the effects of the averaging gets less (the average price gets less affected by the next buy-in). E.g. At the 24th month, the next buy-in is only 4% of the total invested sum while 5 years (60 months), the next buy-in is only 1.7%.

 

skavnox

Junior Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2009
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Came across an interesting video explaining the “bug” in Dollar Cost Averaging (DCA). In the video, it explained the idea of DCA and why many thinks it is a good means to mitigate risk instead of lump sum purchase.

The problem of DCA comes when the period of investment gets longer, the effects of the averaging gets less (the average price gets less affected by the next buy-in). E.g. At the 24th month, the next buy-in is only 4% of the total invested sum while 5 years (60 months), the next buy-in is only 1.7%.

Sorry I can't play the video due to some error.
What's the "bug" that's mentioned in the video?
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top