New adventures in tiong land!!!!

Shalomp

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2012
Messages
49,446
Reaction score
12,415





Bonus pic:




]
FB-IMG-1640692816417.jpg
 

liplai2021

Banned
Joined
May 6, 2021
Messages
4,864
Reaction score
2,904
later history repeats itself like suzhou industrial park
Sure it will! Sorry doggies, know it’s going to be an insult using you to describe CCP but 狗是永遠改不了吃屎的. But neh mind SG súper elites that endorse CCP, not to name people like George Yeo all these, will continue to garner respects and enjoy riches and organic peasant class sinkies will, as name suggest, continue to sink.
 

xdivider

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2000
Messages
53,642
Reaction score
14,844
kgk then go china invest, esepcially in development..........
 

rackgen

Banned
Joined
Dec 30, 2020
Messages
10,113
Reaction score
3,764
>Singapore's senior minister, Lee Kuan Yew conceded that the project had not turned out as planned and had made him more cautious about investments in China, claiming that difficulties arose in signing agreements with the central government, but were then implemented by local officials who "have their own imperatives".[5] Lee said that Chinese officials were "using us to get investors in, and when investors came in, they said: 'You come to my park, it's cheaper'".[5]

>In 2001, one year after Singapore lowered its stake, the park made its first profit of $3.8 million.

-From here

So this means give more profit to local gahmen and kowtow to them mean make some money lah.
Even Sheet times doesn't talk about this.

I suspect this is another attempt by next generation ivory tower PAPaya scholars to "expand their cooperation" with Tiong snake gahmen.

Chiu expect Tiongs to be fair when the past experience mean they show their snake side?

You decide.

Oh yeah, a few more things:

>design and develop features including a 27-hectare Green Belt, an 18km park connector network linking green spaces around the city, and pocket parks at street corners in its central area.

>They will also expand efforts in developing smart technologies and low-carbon living in the city.

Except #2, there's no way to suck blood seek rent from Businesses. This means industries will not come in (Remember few months back where china didn't import enough coal from Oz? They finally relented, imported more coal and restarted Coal plants?) Chiu expect this to be any different?

Problem will be for:
The majority shareholder is Temasek Holdings Pte Ltd which holds 20.46% of Keppel Corporporation.

This is what happens when you write a blank cheque for PAPayas. Song bo 61%?
 

Shalomp

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2012
Messages
49,446
Reaction score
12,415
>Singapore's senior minister, Lee Kuan Yew conceded that the project had not turned out as planned and had made him more cautious about investments in China, claiming that difficulties arose in signing agreements with the central government, but were then implemented by local officials who "have their own imperatives".[5] Lee said that Chinese officials were "using us to get investors in, and when investors came in, they said: 'You come to my park, it's cheaper'".[5]

>In 2001, one year after Singapore lowered its stake, the park made its first profit of $3.8 million.

-From here

So this means give more profit to local gahmen and kowtow to them mean make some money lah.
Even Sheet times doesn't talk about this.

I suspect this is another attempt by next generation ivory tower PAPaya scholars to "expand their cooperation" with Tiong snake gahmen.

Chiu expect Tiongs to be fair when the past experience mean they show their snake side?

You decide.

Oh yeah, a few more things:

>design and develop features including a 27-hectare Green Belt, an 18km park connector network linking green spaces around the city, and pocket parks at street corners in its central area.

>They will also expand efforts in developing smart technologies and low-carbon living in the city.

Except #2, there's no way to suck blood seek rent from Businesses. This means industries will not come in (Remember few months back where china didn't import enough coal from Oz? They finally relented, imported more coal and restarted Coal plants?) Chiu expect this to be any different?

Problem will be for:
The majority shareholder is Temasek Holdings Pte Ltd which holds 20.46% of Keppel Corporporation.

This is what happens when you write a blank cheque for PAPayas. Song bo 61%?
Ah gong also don't trust tiong snakes
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top