Novak literally no hope to play in the tournament already....

junjie433

junjie433

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2008
Messages
36,756
Reaction score
5,803
Clearnfc said:
http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ma1958118/s133c.html
This is the section 133c.... You can read it. Its basically saying minister has the full authority to cancel a person's visa if he wants.

This is his personal powers and court cannot do overrule his powers (he can overrule court). This this really ultimate....
Click to expand...

Quoted"
Djokovic has a right to challenge the latest order in court, and many experts expect he will.

They say it’s likely he will first seek a court injunction to stop his immediate deportation.After that he can launch a case against the specific ground of his visa cancellation.

He is expected to retain the services of legal firm Hall and Wilcox, in Melbourne, who successfully delivered him his first legal win

“He probably would do that, in large measure because he doesn’t want it on the record, he would want to fight it. And he’s a fighter anyway, we know that about him.” Prof Mary Crock, immigration law expert at the University of Sydney had earlier told the BBC.

However, its worth keeping in mind that the Australia Open is due to start on 17 January -
"
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-australia-59964905
Just need to drag it to 18 Jan then he also can't continue to play even if he is to win this legal case again.
 
Zinna

Zinna

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2021
Messages
19,563
Reaction score
11,524
junjie433 said:
Quoted"
Djokovic has a right to challenge the latest order in court, and many experts expect he will.

They say it’s likely he will first seek a court injunction to stop his immediate deportation.After that he can launch a case against the specific ground of his visa cancellation.

He is expected to retain the services of legal firm Hall and Wilcox, in Melbourne, who successfully delivered him his first legal win

“He probably would do that, in large measure because he doesn’t want it on the record, he would want to fight it. And he’s a fighter anyway, we know that about him.” Prof Mary Crock, immigration law expert at the University of Sydney had earlier told the BBC.

However, its worth keeping in mind that the Australia Open is due to start on 17 January -
"
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-australia-59964905
Just need to drag it to 18 Jan then he also can't continue to play even if he is to win this legal case again.
Click to expand...
If he appeal and win case, but only win after Aussie open, he can sue Aussie gahment for compensation anot?
 
PetKat

PetKat

Banned
Joined
Nov 1, 2021
Messages
6,987
Reaction score
3,857
this guy just wanna go play tennis got so much daichi

not like he trying to get citizenship or work permit
 
uselessbum

uselessbum

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2009
Messages
26,466
Reaction score
8,385
Zinna said:
If he appeal and win case, but only win after Aussie open, he can sue Aussie gahment for compensation anot?
Click to expand...

Unlikely. At most only for any expenses incurred during detention/quarantine. It's not like he would have automatically won the match even if there had been no case.

:(
 
C

Clearnfc

Banned
Joined
Apr 10, 2019
Messages
14,093
Reaction score
3,729
Zinna said:
If he appeal and win case, but only win after Aussie open, he can sue Aussie gahment for compensation anot?
Click to expand...

He can appeal, but doesnt mean can win
junjie433 said:
Quoted"
Djokovic has a right to challenge the latest order in court, and many experts expect he will.

They say it’s likely he will first seek a court injunction to stop his immediate deportation.After that he can launch a case against the specific ground of his visa cancellation.

He is expected to retain the services of legal firm Hall and Wilcox, in Melbourne, who successfully delivered him his first legal win

“He probably would do that, in large measure because he doesn’t want it on the record, he would want to fight it. And he’s a fighter anyway, we know that about him.” Prof Mary Crock, immigration law expert at the University of Sydney had earlier told the BBC.

However, its worth keeping in mind that the Australia Open is due to start on 17 January -
"
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-australia-59964905
Just need to drag it to 18 Jan then he also can't continue to play even if he is to win this legal case again.
Click to expand...


Yes he can challenge the minster's decision. However, the minister has the right to overrule any court decision. No.10 specifically says that. Then no.4 also specify that court decision does not apply to this section.

this is basically minister's personal powers. So, basically his only hope is to make the minister reverse his decision. Court cannot overrule minister's personal powers.
 
tokiya

tokiya

Banned
Joined
Nov 25, 2005
Messages
13,088
Reaction score
8,992
If he made the choice to be unvaxxed we should discriminate him.

It's only fair.
 
S

soaresb

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
12,736
Reaction score
2,401
Goodtodo

Goodtodo

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2020
Messages
1,140
Reaction score
362
He is a sore loser who just refuses to accept any upset, on or off the court.
He should just be graceful and accept the fact that he is not welcome in Australia.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top