Seeking clarifications

[Geneco]

Hi,

Seeking clarifications on the following:

You have received a warning at www.hardwarezone.com.sg.

Your post (Yeo Jia Min tio covid) has resulted in a warning worth 3 points. Your account's access may be limited based on these actions. Please keep this in mind when posting or using our site.

Thank you for your kind attention.

 

[Ottoke]

The post was reported to be trolling and not in good taste.

Maybe never take booster? If got take booster, maybe never take 4th shot?

The excuse is always the lack of shots....

Our athelete gets Covid and you don't have to comment until like that.

O

 

[Geneco]

The post was reported to be trolling and not in good taste.



Our athelete gets Covid and you don't have to comment until like that.

O

Well it's quite unfortunate that it has to be interpreted in such a manner as you have put it.

To put in on the record, it was a tongue in cheek comment that was questioning the efficacy of existing/additional shots in preventing infection.

It was not intended as an attack on her and neither are we downplaying her sacrifice in representing our country in such uncertain and risky times.

In all fairness, there are far more "infraction-able" content in that thread if one is paying close attention. These are far more "egregious" and "not in good taste" going by your reasoning, but they are still allowed to persist.

The real question is: Why are these not flagged?

Or is there a group of users or someone targetting us?

Would appreciate a second opinion on this.

@Dragon

Thank you.

 

[reddevil0728]

Well it's quite unfortunate that it has to be interpreted in such a manner as you have put it.

To put in on the record, it was a tongue in cheek comment that was questioning the efficacy of existing/additional shots in preventing infection.

It was not intended as an attack on her and neither are we downplaying her sacrifice in representing our country in such uncertain and risky times.

In all fairness, there are far more "infraction-able" content in that thread if one is paying close attention. These are far more "egregious" and "not in good taste" going by your reasoning, but they are still allowed to persist.

The real question is: Why are these not flagged?

Or is there a group of users or someone targetting us?

Would appreciate a second opinion on this.

@Dragon

Thank you.

Admins/mods said they act on report.

have you reported those posts that you think are worse?

 

[Geneco]

Admins/mods said they act on report.

have you reported those posts that you think are worse?

Well that has no special relevance to the main contention in our response.

The moderation team should be well aware this is not as simple as it looks....

 

[reddevil0728]

Well that has no special relevance to the main contention in our response.

The moderation team should be well aware this is not as simple as it looks....

You are suggesting that what other people said is worse. But 2 wrongs don’t make a right.

if you think they are worse, then why don’t you report them and they get infracted also if it’s deemed to be bad

 

[Geneco]

You are suggesting that what other people said is worse. But 2 wrongs don’t make a right.

if you think they are worse, then why don’t you report them and they get infracted also if it’s deemed to be bad

As said, your reponse holds no special relevance to the main contention at hand.

The real question is "who" are putting in the reports...

 

[reddevil0728]

As said, your reponse holds no special relevance to the main contention at hand.

The real question is "who" are putting in the reports...

Does it matter who reported it?

they people who reported got no control over whether you get infracted or not.

if it is against tos it is against tos, doesn’t matter who report.

If it is not against tos, even if your worst enemy report you 100 times you also wouldn’t be infracted.

 

[Geneco]

Does it matter who reported it?

they people who reported got no control over whether you get infracted or not.

if it is against tos it is against tos, doesn’t matter who report.

If it is not against tos, even if your worst enemy report you 100 times you also wouldn’t be infracted.

Noted on your non helpful response which once again is not relevant to the main contention raised.

Well thankfully, the moderation team are not "naive"...

 

[reddevil0728]

Noted on your non helpful response which once again is not relevant to the main contention raised.

Well thankfully, the moderation team are not "naive"...

I mean if you don’t want to hear what you don’t want to hear there’s nothing that can force you to hear it.

 

[Geneco]

I mean if you don’t want to hear what you don’t want to hear there’s nothing that can force you to hear it.

Well too bad you're not in the moderating team and thus not in the know to offer any helpful or relevant insights...

 

[Dragon]

Closing thread as Moderator has already clarified on the Warning and we hope that going forward member Geneco will be more sensitive towards others when posting on our forums.