Friend of mine, getting a term insurance as below. Anyone can suggest, which company has the lowest premium for this?
Amount: 500K
Policy term: 5 years.
33 Years, Male, Non Smoker
Why only get 5 years? 5 years time he only 38?
Or "touch wood" he predict he only live till 38?
Go for a term plan which increases its premium every 5 years. the "break even" premium payment is around 50+ years old.
It's foolish to do what you have stated because you won't be guaranteed to be insured.
Aviva will be the cheapest but I would really avoid them at all cost, for any insurance.
There are guaranteed 5 years renewable term plans out there. The renewable means you don't have to go for medical underwriting when you renew. The premium will of course be higher after every 5 years.
Go for a term plan which increases its premium every 5 years. the "break even" premium payment is around 50+ years old.
It's foolish to do what you have stated because you won't be guaranteed to be insured.
Aviva will be the cheapest but I would really avoid them at all cost, for any insurance.
Why avoid aviva at all cost?
Breast cancer avoid payout
Only aviva has a special clause which give its policyholders a major disadvantage.
Breast cancer avoid payout
Only aviva has a special clause which give its policyholders a major disadvantage.

I think your info is outdated. That article was 6-7 years ago. Please read through Aviva's policy contract before making such statement now.![]()
How about them adjusting payout before mas stepped in?
In this article, it was reported that Aviva was ‘reprimanded by MOH’ and implied that dialysis coverage for all our customers had been reduced. This is not the case.
We made a downward revision to the claimable percentage of the bill, only for customers who bought plans meant for government/restructured hospitals, yet choose to seek treatment at private hospitals.
For customers who bought those plans and seek treatment at government/restructured hospitals, per the plans’ designs, there is no reduction in coverage; they can claim as charged.
We made this revision in order to be fair to all of our customers. Based on our claims experience, the revised claimable percentage is a more accurate reflection of the difference in cost between subsidised and private facilities. Adjusting this claimable percentage is an important part of ensuring the financial sustainability of Integrated Shield plans for everyone, since Integrated Shield plans work by pooling risks.
However, having understood from MOH that there is currently constrained capacity at subsidised dialysis centres, we realise that some of our customers may not be able to seek treatment at subsidised centres even if they wanted to. It is for this reason that we decided to, on a case-by-case basis, reinstate the old claimable percentage for three of our affected policyholders without any additional costs to them.
Media reporting of the insurance sector plays a valuable role in consumer education. But it is vital to be balanced and accurate, given the importance of insurance cover to millions of policyholders in Singapore.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely,
Yvonne Yeo
Manager - Brand, Sponsorship & PR
Aviva Ltd
Your answer:
bro, a good agent should never resort to bringing down others. You don't say someone is bad to make yourself seems "better". I don't represent Aviva but every companies have a fair share of such matters. It's easy for someone to pull out articles on GE and/or other companies likewise.