Source:
Shows really how jialat the wealth inequality is in SG. As Louis Chua said, there're 2 Singapores now.
How quickly we drop out of the list once average is changed to median.
Says something doesn't it?
CPF can be considered as tax, personally feel that just because it can be used for housing, etc. does not mean it is should not be considered as tax.If you notice it is the countries with low taxation policies that don't quite make the top 15 median list. Except maybe Hong Kong.
Singapore has no natural resources.CPF can be considered as tax, personally feel that just because it can be used for housing, etc. does not mean it is should not be considered as tax.
In a way, it still functions similar to pension schemes in other countries.
Honestly speaking, SG has low to zero taxes on capital gains and estates, etc.
Which means that SG is a prime destination for real estate speculation amd also as a hub to park wealth, etc.
Thus huge inflow into properties, which in turn jack up housing and rent (which in turns drives up COLs), etc.
The SEHC saga, etc. you feel recently, all are a part of this bigger issue. SG is actually close to being a full-blown Landlord Economy right now.
In fact, our health care, etc. takes a huge chunk due to restrictive Medisave requirements and also how expensive insurance policies costs, etc.
SG is a very high cost country to be honest, our home-ownership rates is built on the "99 Years" scheme which is now a ticking time bomb due to the current ongoing lease decay situation.
Our budget surplus is practically built on thr foundation of scrimping on Education and Health care, etc. and make people pay out of own pockets.
SG no capital gains tax and investment income tax is excellent for investors. SG is moving away from workers to investors.CPF can be considered as tax, personally feel that just because it can be used for housing, etc. does not mean it is should not be considered as tax.
In a way, it still functions similar to pension schemes in other countries.
Honestly speaking, SG has low to zero taxes on capital gains and estates, etc.
Which means that SG is a prime destination for real estate speculation amd also as a hub to park wealth, etc.
Thus huge inflow into properties, which in turn jack up housing and rent (which in turns drives up COLs), etc.
The SEHC saga, etc. you feel recently, all are a part of this bigger issue. SG is actually close to being a full-blown Landlord Economy right now.
In fact, our health care, etc. takes a huge chunk due to restrictive Medisave requirements and also how expensive insurance policies costs, etc.
SG is a very high cost country to be honest, our home-ownership rates is built on the "99 Years" scheme which is now a ticking time bomb due to the current ongoing lease decay situation.
Our budget surplus is practically built on thr foundation of scrimping on Education and Health care, etc. and make people pay out of own pockets.
no worry, pap cancel sers to save money, give you vers, your vote cannot hit not PAP fault, the people can blame the hdb flat owners who voted no. Hit enough vote to get vers, get lesser payout since flats already 70 years old, take on new loan and it is also hdb owners own problem. PAP get away again !CPF can be considered as tax, personally feel that just because it can be used for housing, etc. does not mean it is should not be considered as tax.
In a way, it still functions similar to pension schemes in other countries.
Honestly speaking, SG has low to zero taxes on capital gains and estates, etc.
Which means that SG is a prime destination for real estate speculation amd also as a hub to park wealth, etc.
Thus huge inflow into properties, which in turn jack up housing and rent (which in turns drives up COLs), etc.
The SEHC saga, etc. you feel recently, all are a part of this bigger issue. SG is actually close to being a full-blown Landlord Economy right now.
In fact, our health care, etc. takes a huge chunk due to restrictive Medisave requirements and also how expensive insurance policies costs, etc.
SG is a very high cost country to be honest, our home-ownership rates is built on the "99 Years" scheme which is now a ticking time bomb due to the current ongoing lease decay situation.
Our budget surplus is practically built on thr foundation of scrimping on Education and Health care, etc. and make people pay out of own pockets.
Disagree on the 2nd part but can see where you can coming from ba.Singapore has no natural resources.
Everything got to buy. Energy. Food. Water processing also need energy.
So money is the most important in Singapore.
CPF is not tax. Is still your money. But yes can look at it as mandatory pension plan.
Most SGreans feel rich. Which is why they vote PAP.no worry, pap cancel sers to save money, give you vers, your vote cannot hit not PAP fault, the people can blame the hdb flat owners who voted no. Hit enough vote to get vers, get lesser payout since flats already 70 years old, take on new loan and it is also hdb owners own problem. PAP get away again !
What is Netherlands system?Disagree on the 2nd part but can see where you can coming from ba.
CPF system may perhaps be 1 of the main reasons why so many elderlies still have to work when old.
Due to alot of them already used up CPF and healthcare, etc. when young to pay for housing, etc.
But trade-off is that we no need a huge young working population to sustain the pension payouts for the older folks.
So CPF honestly overall not that bad of a system, but compared to Netherlands (usually ranked #1 each year by Mercer) is still lacking in a sense.
Source:
Shows really how jialat the wealth inequality is in SG. As Louis Chua said, there're 2 Singapores now.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pensions_in_the_NetherlandsWhat is Netherlands system?
SGD still stronger than most of the countries in both lists. Goes to show how rich and wealthy SG is.
Data is always going to be flawed in some way.
And most importantly as long as someone is on the upper half of the average (not even median) then why bother about the lower half?
This has always been the SG culture. Push to get into the upper 50% and even better top 10% top 1%.
From my experience as a SGrean and still from listening to SGreans now, no one cares about the less well to do in SG except the govt. In fact SGreans will feel good that they are doing better than someone not doing so well.
Canada also got Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Old Age Security (OAS)https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pensions_in_the_Netherlands
You can reference above ba
https://www.mercer.com/insights/inv...x/#embed-accordion-c8fd991543-item-69df0cc2eb
SG usually is ranked between 5th to 10th one, each year different but Netherlands most of the time is at least top 3 (if not #1)
| Benefit | Average / Max | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| CPP | CAD 808.14 (avg) / CAD 1,433.00 (max) | Depends on contribution history and retirement timing |
| OAS | Up to CAD 734.95 | Based on full eligibility and no income clawback |