Voltage question on overclocking

cenedra

Banned
Joined
Apr 9, 2009
Messages
11,121
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys,

Im currently using i2500k and set Vcore to 1.28V @ 4.2Ghz. However when im gaming I notice from core temp that my VID increases to 1.36V under load. Is this due to LLC settings? And should i leave LLC on, or off it so that my voltage can be constant?

Thanks.
 

Yureak

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
18,905
Reaction score
33
Your chip will automatically draw more power when necessary

If it doesnt affect stability can just leave it
 

cenedra

Banned
Joined
Apr 9, 2009
Messages
11,121
Reaction score
0
In that case, if using high vcore like 1.4v, wouldnt the CPU exceed the safe voltage of 1.5v in full load?
 

Yureak

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
18,905
Reaction score
33
In that case, if using high vcore like 1.4v, wouldnt the CPU exceed the safe voltage of 1.5v in full load?

Dont believe the overdraw is so much. I ran 1.4v on my 4670k and when stressed goes up to 1.43 or so.

1.5v is still ok if u have custom loop cooling
 

cenedra

Banned
Joined
Apr 9, 2009
Messages
11,121
Reaction score
0
Im a little confused by Vcore and VID. Can someone enlighten me pls.

When i run prime95, my vcore as shown in CPU-Z is 12.8v, but core temp shows my VID as 13.7V. So which voltage is my CPU actually receiving?


I often see people talking about setting Vcores in bios and not to exceed Vcore beyond the safety limits, but not many people talking about VIDs.


Lets say if a CPU has a max voltage tolerance of 1.6V, and when oced, its Vcore is 1.5v but the VID is 1.7v, is this fine or has it exceeded the safe voltage?
 

devilwahaha

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
2,366
Reaction score
0
Im a little confused by Vcore and VID. Can someone enlighten me pls.

When i run prime95, my vcore as shown in CPU-Z is 12.8v, but core temp shows my VID as 13.7V. So which voltage is my CPU actually receiving?


I often see people talking about setting Vcores in bios and not to exceed Vcore beyond the safety limits, but not many people talking about VIDs.


Lets say if a CPU has a max voltage tolerance of 1.6V, and when oced, its Vcore is 1.5v but the VID is 1.7v, is this fine or has it exceeded the safe voltage?
If you wanna OC and want to play around with the voltages and stuff, at least have the heart to bother googling.

VID is simply the stock voltage that the chip requests for the frequency its running at that is set when Intel bins them, eg my 3570k will draw 1.3V when I set it to 4.2GHz if I dont manually set voltage settings

Vcore is simply the voltage your chip is receiving.

Simple googling gave me these answers.
 

cenedra

Banned
Joined
Apr 9, 2009
Messages
11,121
Reaction score
0
If you wanna OC and want to play around with the voltages and stuff, at least have the heart to bother googling.

VID is simply the stock voltage that the chip requests for the frequency its running at that is set when Intel bins them, eg my 3570k will draw 1.3V when I set it to 4.2GHz if I dont manually set voltage settings

Vcore is simply the voltage your chip is receiving.

Simple googling gave me these answers.

I already did, thats why im asking.

I set my vcore to be a fixed voltage 1.28v, which core temp is reporting correctly, yet my VID displayed in CPU-Z is exceeding that voltage to 1.37v, and thus the question i asked, which voltage is the CPU receiving?
 

Yureak

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
18,905
Reaction score
33
I already did, thats why im asking.

I set my vcore to be a fixed voltage 1.28v, which core temp is reporting correctly, yet my VID displayed in CPU-Z is exceeding that voltage to 1.37v, and thus the question i asked, which voltage is the CPU receiving?

No idea on vid but your parameters are very safe no worries
 

devilwahaha

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
2,366
Reaction score
0
I already did, thats why im asking.

I set my vcore to be a fixed voltage 1.28v, which core temp is reporting correctly, yet my VID displayed in CPU-Z is exceeding that voltage to 1.37v, and thus the question i asked, which voltage is the CPU receiving?

VID is simply a set of numbers that Intel stamps onto each CPU so that mobos can know how much voltage to supply at each frequency to be stable, example 3.2GHz 1V, 3.4GHz 1.1V etc, while Vcore is your "real" voltage reading. VID voltages will definitely work properly for each of the steppings but they may not always be the most efficient, like in your case Intel deems 1.37v is required for your set frequency but its working fine with 1.28v.
 

cenedra

Banned
Joined
Apr 9, 2009
Messages
11,121
Reaction score
0
VID is simply a set of numbers that Intel stamps onto each CPU so that mobos can know how much voltage to supply at each frequency to be stable, example 3.2GHz 1V, 3.4GHz 1.1V etc, while Vcore is your "real" voltage reading. VID voltages will definitely work properly for each of the steppings but they may not always be the most efficient, like in your case Intel deems 1.37v is required for your set frequency but its working fine with 1.28v.

oic thx, i understand now.

So there's no need to worry about VID. I was just surprised how come its so much higher than my vcore, and i was trying ways to lower the VID LOL.
 

devilwahaha

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
2,366
Reaction score
0
oic thx, i understand now.

So there's no need to worry about VID. I was just surprised how come its so much higher than my vcore, and i was trying ways to lower the VID LOL.

End users only can tweak vcore usually from mobo, VID can be tweak IIRC but thats a highly technical feat thats pointless for us end users.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top