Guys, exciting news, the big V launched a new ETF that might be a better option than IWDA without the hassle of EIMI.
Ticks all the boxes, domiciled in Ireland + Accumulative, just launched 2 days ago.
FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRA)
Ooh, this is interesting. And it's an alternate share class of VWRD, so it's got plenty of AUM; most brand-new funds are difficult to recommend because they don't have a lot of assets. Not gonna lie, this is intriguing, and it might solve the biggest problem with IWDA: people coming in and asking "but I want an allocation to emerging markets as well, what do I do?".
Hi all,
I was checking to see if there were any Vanguard Small Cap ETFs listed on the LSE similar to the S&P 500 one like VUSD/VUSA. I came across 0A16, 0A17, 0LOE. Am abit confused. Can anyone enlighten me?
Are you looking for US small-caps, global small-caps, something else...?
And why are you looking for small-caps specifically?
(snip WQDV screenshot)
Bid offer spread of less than 0.01. Vested.
Mate that is not an "ex-technology" fund. Cisco is
#3 on their list of holdings!
I read that gold backed etf gains are taxed as collectibles. In this case do I have to pay taxes if I sell GLDM at a gain?
This, as everyone's already pointed out, only applies to US taxpayers.
do the local etf providers self index or pay the index providers?
They all pay to license the Straits Times Index or the MSCI Singapore index.
Hi ST and other experts, I'm sure you've heard of the FIRE movement. The assumption is that once you hit 25x (and correspondingly, a 4% annual withdrawal rate) of your projected annual expenses, you can pretty much quit your day job and retire.
Do you think such a portfolio target provides enough growth to last for the duration of one's retirement assuming one sticks to the planned withdrawal rate if retirement is say, in one's 40s or even 30s? (Assume RbR portfolio allocation and adjustments for life)
Nope. A 4% withdrawal rate is an artefact of pre-GFC days when you could get 5%+ yields out of the long bond and when people retired at 65. These days, when bonds only yield a couple of percent, a 4% withdrawal rate runs a much higher risk of running out of money - and the "retire early" devotees talk about retiring in your forties on that withdrawal rate, which is absolutely delusional. You're basically guaranteed to run out of money.
The other problem is that your projected annual expenses will pretty much always be too low. Growing old is expensive! Everyone -
everyone - underestimates how much your medical expenses will cost when you get old. This isn't as much of a problem in Singapore where the default health coverage is pretty solid, but it is still something to think about.
You want to know the thing about early-retirement gurus? They're not actually retired, they're working just as hard as they used to when they had a desk job - it's just that they're cranking out books, podcasts, and TV appearances. So it's a bit disingenuous for them to say "oh I made enough money to retire at forty!" when it's immediately followed by "...and if you sign up for my multi-hundred-dollar course you can do the same!".
Hi everyone. If you have been DCA'ing into a bond ETF, have you thought about what to do
if bond yield turns negative?
[...]
If we enter a negative bond yield environment:
- do we continue DCA'ing into negative yielding bond?
- or should we do differently?
Hmm. So I was going to be flippant and say "you wouldn't change strategy because every other bond-like place to put your money is going to have negative interest as well", but that's not strictly true.
The rule of thumb in Switzerland right now, where interest rates are nearly -1% in the front end, is that bank deposits only get charged negative interest when they're larger than 100,000 CHF. So what you'd probably do when bond yields got below about -0.5% (to make it worth all the headache) is you'd switch from bond ETFs to opening a bunch of bank accounts all holding 99,000 CHF.
That's a giant pain in the arse, though. And really: Swiss interest rates being ridiculously negative hasn't stopped people from wanting to own Swiss bonds. Swiss interest rates are ridiculously negative
because so many people want to own Swiss bonds!