KnyghtRyder
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2002
- Messages
- 18,421
- Reaction score
- 3,476
Think from the logic it doesn't track by location but by people.
Think the logic is when there is a cluster at certain location, from the safe entry they will know who are there. But many places so big, not everyone in the same place would be exposed to the infected.
Thus think the token then comes in handy to further narrow down on those who are in close proximity with the infected at the location, as think the token only detect and record those other tokens who are within certain close distance of each other.
Maybe they should have bothered explain it more clearly why they do certain things. Then many people won't be so blur and wonder why this and that. Its ironic they say they got listen to people but think their actions often seems to say otherwise. Often they seems still stuck in the past with the top down approach, seems tend take it for granted that whatever they say people should understand and do, no need much questions.![]()
You speak a lot of sense.
Let's say an infected person goes to gardens by the bay.. are you going 5o test everyone that was at gardens by the bay in that afternoon? Doesn't make sense. But if people had their trace together working. Then they can zoom in on those specific individuals that the infected person had proximity to..

