CPF Easy Info Thread. :)

zuppeur

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Messages
15,260
Reaction score
2,720
If i already hit FRS, would i still be able to do rstu to ers?
 

apatheticme

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2006
Messages
673
Reaction score
2
No. Funds contributed under RSTU can be withdrawn at 55.

As long as its any amount above FRS.

Sent from OPPO F1s using GAGT

Technically he is right. You can't contribute more than FRS (or ERS after 55) with RSTU and the retirement sums only increase. Therefore you can never take out monies contributed via RSTU. You can, however, withdraw the money you displaced by doing RSTU.
 

elnewbie

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
2,123
Reaction score
1
There has been a lot of questions raised on RSTU recently.

May I suggest that we also look at VC contributions?

If the tax relief is not a factor, there are advantages in doing a VC contribution over a RSTU. main advantage is that all funds under VC aren't as restricted as RSTU.

Both my parents who are in their 70s are using the VC method instead of RSTU as such funds can be withdrawn in lump sum easily.
 

elnewbie

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
2,123
Reaction score
1
I am aware that as long as you reach the FRS threshold, the excess can be withdrawn. Having said that, as long as one is working, it is more likely that the majority of the SA comes from salary contributions. (Unless one did a huge RSTU contribution early on)

Anyway, have a look at my other post on VC.

As in your previous CPF statement?

Sent from OPPO F1s using GAGT
 

crimsontactics

Honorary Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
109,537
Reaction score
22,732
Technically he is right. You can't contribute more than FRS (or ERS after 55) with RSTU and the retirement sums only increase. Therefore you can never take out monies contributed via RSTU. You can, however, withdraw the money you displaced by doing RSTU.

I get what you mean.

Basically, you need to start investing early to take advantage of compound interest.
 

crimsontactics

Honorary Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
109,537
Reaction score
22,732
There has been a lot of questions raised on RSTU recently.

May I suggest that we also look at VC contributions?

If the tax relief is not a factor, there are advantages in doing a VC contribution over a RSTU. main advantage is that all funds under VC aren't as restricted as RSTU.

Both my parents who are in their 70s are using the VC method instead of RSTU as such funds can be withdrawn in lump sum easily.

There are some problems with VC that makes it unattractive for me.

Firstly, a mandatory portion of VC goes into my MA, which I don't really like because I won't be able to withdraw it.

Secondly, there is a very low annual cap of VC at around $35k. For people like me who wants to invest a larger sum of money to take advantage of the compounding effect, it's not possible with VC.
 

crimsontactics

Honorary Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
109,537
Reaction score
22,732
I am aware that as long as you reach the FRS threshold, the excess can be withdrawn. Having said that, as long as one is working, it is more likely that the majority of the SA comes from salary contributions. (Unless one did a huge RSTU contribution early on)

Anyway, have a look at my other post on VC.

Yes. I did a large deposit into RSTU early on to take advantage of the compounding effect.
 

Wood41

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
8,631
Reaction score
2
The government is smart enough to know
richer would abuse the safety & relatively high
yield of CPF .

Already 1 group wants to maximise the return & the other 'CPF-not-my-$' .
 

bladez87

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
22,530
Reaction score
1,233
Technically he is right. You can't contribute more than FRS (or ERS after 55) with RSTU and the retirement sums only increase. Therefore you can never take out monies contributed via RSTU. You can, however, withdraw the money you displaced by doing RSTU.

what do you mean by the bold part?
 

henrylbh

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
16,123
Reaction score
846

crimsontactics

Honorary Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2009
Messages
109,537
Reaction score
22,732
The government is smart enough to know
richer would abuse the safety & relatively high
yield of CPF .

Already 1 group wants to maximise the return & the other 'CPF-not-my-$' .
Yes.

That's why I worry, SG society too divided.

Poor too poor, rich too rich, govt policy not consistent as they have to cater to both groups.

Sent from OPPO F1s using GAGT
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top