BBCWatcher
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2010
- Messages
- 23,322
- Reaction score
- 4,836
The current edition was published in 2019 (this year).Planning to get his book but saw that it's published in 2017. Is it still relevant today?

The current edition was published in 2019 (this year).Planning to get his book but saw that it's published in 2017. Is it still relevant today?
IWDA is not a currency or equivalent. It's a stock fund. It happens to be quoted in two currencies: U.S. dollars and British pounds (via its sister listing SWDA which holds the identical stocks in the identical ratios). But you could quote it yourself in Peruvian sol if you want.
On the other hand, SDIA is a currency equivalent. It's a fund that holds U.S. dollar denominated short-term corporate bonds. Generally speaking it's a rather odd thing to invest in if you're planning to retire in Singapore, but OK, whatever. Yes, there you do have explicit currency risk relative to your retirement destination. But that risk really only ramps up as you get closer to retirement.
You're probably not in the right bond fund, but let's assume you are for sake of argument. What you'd typically do starting 7 years before drawdown age -- or up to 10 years before drawdown age if you're particularly conservative -- is to start gradually, progressively adjusting your investment portfolio from an accumulation posture to a drawdown posture. The "rule of thumb" is that you'd make these adjustments over that time:
1. Shift from an 80%-20% stocks-bonds split to a 30%-70% split.
2. If necessary, shift the bond portion to bonds that are denominated in the retirement country's currency. Or, if the retirement country currency is a lousy currency (nonconvertible, prone to mismanagement, or whatever), shift to a bond fund with a reasonable global diversification in currencies. (CORP would be such an example.) Fortunately, unless circumstances change dramatically, the Singapore dollar is a quality currency and offers very reasonable bond fund choices.
So that's the good answer. You "program" a glide path from your accumulation portfolio to your drawdown portfolio, and then you execute the plan starting 7 years before drawdown (or up to 10 before drawdown if you're particularly conservative).
Let's suppose you currently have 80% of you wealth invested in IWDA and 20% in SDIA. (Probably not, but let's just go with this simple example.) You'd want your drawdown portfolio to be something like 15% IWDA, 15% ES3 (or G3B), and 70% MBH, let's suppose. And let's suppose you're going to make these adjustments over 10 years before drawdown because you're quite conservative -- and because the math is a little simpler. OK then, here we go....
1. To move from 80% IWDA to 15% IWDA, you reduce IWDA by 6.5% per year. That's roughly half a percentage point per month.
2. To move from 20% SDIA to 0% SDIA you reduce SDIA by 2 percentage points per year.
3. To move from 0% ES3 to 15% ES3, you increase ES3 by 1.5 percentage points per year.
4. To move from 0% MBH to 70% MBH, you increase MBH by 7 percentage points per year.
You're still saving and investing, so in practice it'll be a lot of "new" money buying ES3 and MBH with some IWDA and SDIA sale money also going into those funds, mostly MBH. Since ES3 and MBH can be held inside a Supplementary Retirement Scheme account, you could use that "wrapper" for some tax savings.
it bugs me that a lot of ppl in SG still have the misconception that investing in USD denominated equities is equal to taking on USD forex risk. (although technically there is a bit of forex risk if the company does business mainly in USD, and if there is a time gap between selling the counter and converting the USD back to SGD).
Doesn't help when some of the personal finance sites are also spreading this misconception.
long term, it's going to be fine.Could u explain more why forex risk should not be a major concern? I mean to buy IWDA for e.g. requires us to exchange sgd for usd. And say we liquidate this eventually, wouldn't we be subject to forex risk if we convert the sold usd back to sgd? Or am I missing something here?
it bugs me that a lot of ppl in SG still have the misconception that investing in USD denominated equities is equal to taking on USD forex risk. (although technically there is a bit of forex risk if the company does business mainly in USD, and if there is a time gap between selling the counter and converting the USD back to SGD).
Doesn't help when some of the personal finance sites are also spreading this misconception.
long term, it's going to be fine.
forex in the long term will have some adjustments but it's not going to be v significant.
the returns you get from a passive market index ETF means that it's compounding effect yields you more than worrying about the fx movements.
get something from irish side of things where the dividend taxes is lower than if it's based out of US side of things and you would have done your best in costs reduction.
Could u explain more why forex risk should not be a major concern? I mean to buy IWDA for e.g. requires us to exchange sgd for usd. And say we liquidate this eventually, wouldn't we be subject to forex risk if we convert the sold usd back to sgd? Or am I missing something here?
How big a factor is the liquidity of an ETF? Some of these Irish domiciled ETFs have very low daily volume average compared to their US counterparts. How do we judge if it's worthwhile to DCA in the long term? What are the implications? Possible it will no longer exist after a few years, etc?
Forex risk is something to bear in mind when investing in foreign stocks. This is especially so when you are investing in emerging markets where currency can move as much as stock indices.
For USD investments, the forex risk is lower. USD is the world's reserve currency, so extreme movements are extremely unlikely because of widespread global support for the currency. However, don't assume this will remain so if the U.S monetary authorities do irresponsible things like pandering to certain U.S politician's demands to loosen monetary conditions for their selfish political ends.
Answering the question directly, the world's top 10 most traded currencies are, in order:For Singaporeans who want to diversify to other foreign currencies, other than US$, any better choice out there?
If USD falls your etf value will just go up because the value of the underlying stock stays the same.
If sgd rises against USD then your returns will suffer. If sgd falls then you will suffer if you want to spend in other currency.
Yes, as a first order effect. However, there are plenty of other effects in a dynamic global financial system.If USD falls your etf value will just go up because the value of the underlying stock stays the same.
Not necessarily unless you’re holding U.S. dollars in some form, and you’re not if you’re holding stocks. If you’re holding a stock fund consisting of U.S. exporters (in whatever currency it’s quoted in) then that stock fund should go up in value, actually.If sgd rises against USD then your returns will suffer.
Currency really doesn’t matter, even for bond funds, until you get close to drawdown age. Yes, when you’re actually drawing down assets to buy real goods and services using a particular currency then currency matters. But then you wouldn’t be holding all that many stocks either.If sgd falls then you will suffer if you want to spend in other currency.
Hence good to hold both sti and global etf.
These questions have been asked and answered many times, but if you’re still confused then just start with this very basic fact and think about it for a while: when you exchange any currency for something that’s not a currency and rather far removed from a currency — you use British pounds to buy a Picasso painting, for example — do you have currency risk between British pounds and some other currency because you now own a Picasso? No, you own a Picasso.(*) You may have art valuation risks since that’s what a Picasso is, but you don’t have currency exchange risks. Nor oil valuation risks — a Picasso is not a barrel of oil either. (OK, maybe the value of your Picasso can go up or down a bit when the price of oil does, because art collectors in petroeconomies have more or less wealth based on the price of oil, but that’s not a direct effect.)I'm only a novice so correct me if I got anything wrong there, but I think all the long paragraphs don't adequately or succinctly answer this question.
These questions have two very different answers.
If you don't know which country you'll retire in, then a global corporate bond ETF is a good bet, one with exposure to USD and euros and yen and pounds... etc etc. CORP (listed in London) is a good pick in this case.
If you're going to retire in the UK (though I'd encourage you to reconsider that plan, the weather in the UK sucks), you'll want to focus on GBP-denominated corporate bonds. SLXX (again listed in London) is the pick here.
Can we have a quick and dirty answer to the forex risks when buying equity etf question?
Like:
If USD falls your etf value will just go up because the value of the underlying stock stays the same.
Hmm.. Now I'm confused. Is the above true?
Let's say we buy IWDA now and sell in 20 years, 1USD=1.35 SGD. If 20 years later, 1USD=1.2 SGD, our returns will suffer right? If 1USD= 1.5 SGD then, we will earn even more than the capital gains. This is what we mean by currency risk. (I've accepted this risk as inherent if we want to buy overseas equities)
Where does the ETF value according to currency come in?