*Official* BBCWatcher club

belgarathc

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2003
Messages
1,733
Reaction score
172
Maybe I should check with my company if I can be relocated to US. We enjoyed our recent holidays to New York. :)
Besides US, I am also keen in Norway. Perhaps there are also beneficial terms for individuals who intent to work or invest there.
 

celtosaxon

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2018
Messages
1,799
Reaction score
882
To both, do you know if there are any tax advantages allocated to Singaporeans investing in US since US nationals can buy SG properties like locals? I am just thinking if there are any reciprocal benefits that Singsporeans can make use of.

BBCW covered it, the US does not “stick it to foreigners” the way SG does. You’ll be on an equal footing with locals in just about every regard.

I just sold a house I bought there 15 years ago for $112k. I still own the 6,000 Sq ft empty lot next door (bought for $8k ten years ago); not sure what I’m gonna do with it. Maybe build a storage shed or a small house. Waiting for a slump in construction costs.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,027
Reaction score
5,285
BBCW covered it, the US does not “stick it to foreigners” the way SG does.
The only thing I’ve heard lately is that some places, like New York City, are annoyed with foreign buyers of homes who then leave them mostly vacant. So there’s some debate in a few places about raising property taxes in these edge cases. I don’t know if that’s actually happened anywhere yet, and it wouldn’t be national policy even if it did.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,027
Reaction score
5,285
Here's an interesting question: how many SDIC participating institutions in Singapore accept retail (personal) deposits? If you're trying to obtain the maximum possible SDIC protection (S$75,000 per depositor per bank) for a big pile of Singapore dollar cash then the answer to this question could be interesting to you. Let's take a look (in alphabetical order). Bolded institutions are FAST participating banks making it quicker to move funds.

1. Bangkok Bank
2. Bank of China
3. Bank of India
4. CIMB
5. Citibank
6. DBS/POSB
7. GXS (*)
8. HL Bank
9. Hong Leong Finance
10. HSBC
11. ICICI
12. Indian Bank
13. Indian Overseas Bank
14. ICBC
15. Maybank
16. MariBank (*)
17. OCBC
18. BNI
19. RHB
20. Sing Investments & Finance
21. Singapura Finance
22. Standard Chartered (including Trust Bank)
23. State Bank of India
24. Bank of East Asia
25. UCO Bank
26. UOB

(*) Currently only accepting deposits by invitation (waiting list).

Summary

If you deposit S$75,000 in each of the 26 SDIC participating institutions then you can get a total of S$1.95 million of insured deposits.

If you deposit S$75,000 in each of the 16 SDIC and FAST participating institutions then you can get a total of S$1.2 million of insured deposits.

You can also hold up to S$200,000 worth of Singapore Savings Bonds and essentially unlimited amounts of T-bills. Those vehicles are direct government debt obligations, but they're somewhat less liquid than on demand deposits.

If you have a spouse or partner then together you can effectively double these limits (via separate individual accounts).
 

celtosaxon

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2018
Messages
1,799
Reaction score
882
Here's an interesting question: how many SDIC participating institutions in Singapore accept retail (personal) deposits?

In 1981 “The Enquirer” trademarked the phrase “enquiring minds want to know” — this post triggered a childhood memory of that slogan 😉!
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,027
Reaction score
5,285
Here's a periodic reminder that the next U.S. Diversity Visa Lottery ("DV-2025") should be open for registration in October, 2023. Set a calendar reminder to yourself for early October if you wish to participate.

Every year the U.S. sets aside 50,000 visas offering a direct path to U.S. permanent residence. These visas are available via a lottery to individuals (and their immediate families) who come from countries that do not currently represent large fractions of U.S. immigrants. For these purposes country of origin is typically based on your birthplace, not on your citizenship/nationality.

There's no fee to enter the lottery. Use only the official U.S. State Department Web site to enter (linked above) when the lottery is open in October. Do NOT pay any "agents" or other entities purporting to offer you some advantage. That's just a scam. If you have a spouse (same or opposite sex) who's also eligible to apply you can both apply individually. Then if either of you wins the lottery the whole household can proceed with visa applications. Singles are welcome, too. There are no age limits to enter the lottery, but as a practical matter you'll probably need to be at least 17 when entering. To qualify for a visa you'll eventually need to demonstrate that you've completed at least the equivalent of a U.S. high school education, and it's unlikely you'll be able to do that if you're too young.

You can enter the DV lottery even if you happen to be located in the United States (as an international student, for example).

The chance of winning the lottery if your country of origin is Singapore is some low single digit percentage, probably. The odds are not great, but it's free to enter, and you can enter every year. If you're lucky enough to win the lottery then you must act quickly to proceed with your visa application. The U.S. selects more lottery winners than there are actual visas available because many winners won't meet the visa requirements or will otherwise not act quickly enough. To qualify you'll need to demonstrate some reasonable economic/financial stamina. Oversimplifying a bit, if your household has US$100,000+ of liquid assets then that'll probably be OK, but more would be safer. (The U.S. government simply wants to have some reasonable assurance you won't become a public burden, so there are some financial questions to answer truthfully.) You'll also need to show that you've been vaccinated against various diseases per the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) immunization schedule. If you're missing a vaccine (or need a booster) you'll need to get that taken care of quickly. But all of that comes only if you win the lottery and then proceed to the visa application process. Entering the DV lottery is simple and quick.

The next lottery is confusingly called "DV-2025" because 2025 is the year when 2023 lottery winners who successfully complete the visa application and processing steps would be most likely to relocate to the United States. But, to repeat, act quickly and with due care if you're a winner and if you want to move to the United States.

To be clear, I live in Singapore, like Singapore, and have no plans to relocate. And if I ever do relocate it won't necessarily be to the United States. If you're the same, great! But people vary, so I point out various opportunities for those who'd like to try something different.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,027
Reaction score
5,285
Channel News Asia published an opinion piece on bringing back some form of inheritance or estate tax in Singapore. In principle I’m in favor, but I don’t think it’s as complicated as the author suggests. The government has plenty of other tax rules that are more complicated. How about applying a minimum ABSD rate of, say, 20% to the portion of gifted or inherited property in excess of S$5 million or the ordinary ADSB rate, whichever is higher? The death of any beneficiary for a property held in trust would be deemed as a taxable event for these purposes.

The minimum ABSD on a $6 million home transferred (or deemed transferred) to an heir would be $200,000 (20% of the amount in excess of $5 million) per this rule.

A similar transfer tax rule could be applied to private automobiles on the residual value in excess of S$250,000. Inherit a Bugatti with 9 years to go on its COE? Tax will be owed.

Sure, some due diligence is required to make the rules reasonably tight, but these two transfer taxes shouldn’t be that complicated. I think I'd be in favor. I'd probably also favor a spousal exemption subject to a couple anti-abuse rules. Examples: Surviving spouse lives in the house, couple married for at least 3 years.
 
Last edited:

celtosaxon

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2018
Messages
1,799
Reaction score
882
Channel News Asia published an opinion piece on bringing back some form of inheritance or estate tax in Singapore. In principle I’m in favor, but I don’t think it’s as complicated as the author suggests. The government has plenty of other tax rules that are more complicated. How about applying a minimum ABSD rate of, say, 20% to the portion of gifted or inherited property in excess of S$5 million or the ordinary ADSB rate, whichever is higher? The death of any beneficiary for a property held in trust would be deemed as a taxable event for these purposes.

The minimum ABSD on a $6 million home transferred (or deemed transferred) to an heir would be $200,000 (20% of the amount in excess of $5 million) per this rule.

A similar transfer tax rule could be applied to private automobiles on the residual value in excess of S$250,000. Inherit a Bugatti with 9 years to go on its COE? Tax will be owed.

Sure, some due diligence is required to make the rules reasonably tight, but these two transfer taxes shouldn’t be that complicated. I think I'd be in favor. I'd probably also favor a spousal exemption subject to a couple anti-abuse rules. Examples: Surviving spouse lives in the house, couple married for at least 3 years.

How about beneficiaries who can’t afford to pay the tax, they’d be forced to sell the property they inherit just to pay the tax?

I’d suggest an IPSSD Inherited Property Sellers Stamp Duty, payable upon sale.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,027
Reaction score
5,285
How about beneficiaries who can’t afford to pay the tax, they’d be forced to sell the property they inherit just to pay the tax?
Or cash out financing, as they prefer.

N.B. Mortgage debt would not be counted for these purposes. Otherwise the owner could simply mortgage the home to avoid the tax (to drop the home equity down to S$5 million or at least closer to it). And conceivably the loan could be a “dodgy” one, via a family member. Lenders would have to take into account the ABSD when deciding how much they’re willing to provide in home equity/cash out financing. But even for a S$10 million home minimum luxury ABSD would be only S$1 million (10%), and nobody is lending more than 75% of home valuation today.
I’d suggest an IPSSD Inherited Property Sellers Stamp Duty, payable upon sale.
Or why not just apply a minimum 20% ABSD on the portion of a home’s value in excess of S$5 million for every sale/transfer, death-related or otherwise? With a narrow spousal exception(*) perhaps. A minimum ABSD on luxury homes could be just another line in the current ABSD rate schedule. Pretty easy, really.

Apply the same 20% tax rate on the portion of a private automobile’s resale value in excess of S$250,000 (inclusive of COE). If the owner dies in a car wreck then the first part of the car insurance payout would go to the government to settle the tax, and the remainder would go to the decedent’s estate.

Whack the cars and expensive homes upon transfer! It’s at least really difficult to avoid or evade these luxury taxes since they relate to real property in Singapore, and they can only affect genuinely well-to-do households. They wouldn’t materially affect wealthy households’ incentives or behaviors (an overwrought argument anyway). And to the extent they do (reducing demand for palatial homes) that’s a GOOD thing (more housing units in Singapore’s limited space). It might also cajole wealthy households to allocate more of their wealth to productive business investments in Singapore at the margins. And they‘re on top of existing tax schedules and tax collection structures, so there’s not a lot of bureaucracy to add.

Singapore is in the midst of hiking property taxes primarily on luxury homes. The first hike took effect January 1, 2023. This coming January 1 the second half of the hike will take effect. I see one more tweak available: harmonize the owner-occupied and non-owner occupied marginal rates in the upper couple brackets. The 2024 top 2 marginal rates on owner-occupied homes will be 26% and 32%. Just raise them to the non-owner occupied marginal rates of 28% and 36%. Owner-occupied homes will still enjoy a significant property tax break no matter what the home‘s annual value, but the benefit would be attenuated at the super luxury end of the market. And owner-occupiers don’t have to pay income tax on rental income.

Likewise, Singapore could introduce property taxes on luxury private automobiles. The 0% rate could extend to vehicles worth the equivalent of S$250,000 or less (COE inclusive), and then about 4 marginal rates could extend upward from there. (Maybe $250K to $400K, $400K to $700K, $700K to $1M, and $1M+.) VPT can be straightforwardly attached to the current 6 Month Road Tax regime.

Are there any other wealth taxes we can think of?

(*) What would a narrow spousal exception be like? If the spouse was married to the decedent for at least 3 years, was not legally separated, lives in the home (immediately before and after the death), and otherwise qualifies for 0% ABSD then Minimum Luxury ABSD would be waived. I think I’d grant the same sort of exception to a disabled immediate family member.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,027
Reaction score
5,285
There are numerous U.S. media reports that the FDIC is auctioning First Republic Bank right now (this weekend). JP Morgan Chase, PNC, and Citizens Financial Group are rumored to be the bidders most likely to acquire First Republic Bank with FDIC guarantees. US Bancorp is another possibility. If the media reports are accurate (yes, probably) then very soon we should learn that either another bank has taken over First Republic (with some FDIC risk sharing) or the FDIC has (because the FDIC wasn't satisfied with any of the final bids).

The media reports indicate that there will be an announcement before Asian markets open Monday morning. Some of them are closed for the May 1 holiday, so the FDIC might get a couple more hours than usual. Final bids are reportedly due to the FDIC by Sunday noon Eastern U.S. Time (midnight early morning Monday here in Singapore).

First Republic Bank is a super regional bank in the United States, but it has a rather odd assortment of states where it does business. For anti-trust reasons I think PNC (or another regional bank) makes more sense as the acquiring bank, but we'll see. First Republic Bank's share price has crashed already, and it's likely shareholders will be wiped out.

Insured deposits are already FDIC guaranteed. But I think uninsured deposits will also be kept whole given the recent SVB precedent. That's even more likely if another bank acquires First Republic Bank.

The stock prices of some other regional U.S. banks have been wobbling a bit given shareholder fears of other bank failures. This situation is pretty weird, though. These banks are very well capitalized, but no bank can withstand a bank run if it's big and fast enough. At this point I'm not that concerned, and even if I were concerned I don't think I'd be doing anything different.

Whenever a bank fails in the U.S. insured depositors aren't impacted. It's really quite smooth. I've mentioned before that I was a depositor at a bank that was closed on a Friday afternoon by the FDIC. Nothing really happened from my point of view. All the essential services like ATMs and debit cards kept working. By Monday morning the acquiring bank had hung temporary signs, and the failed bank's branches were suddenly new branches with the acquiring bank's logo. That's one advantage of a gigantic financial market with literally thousands of banks: the regulator has some practice. It's really quite amazing how smooth the process is for bank customers, at least the ones with insured deposits.
 
Last edited:

philips107

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2002
Messages
924
Reaction score
621
There are numerous U.S. media reports that the FDIC is auctioning First Republic Bank right now (this weekend). JP Morgan Chase, PNC, and Citizens Financial Group are rumored to be the bidders most likely to acquire First Republic Bank with FDIC guarantees. US Bancorp is another possibility. If the media reports are accurate (yes, probably) then very soon we should learn that either another bank has taken over First Republic (with some FDIC risk sharing) or the FDIC has (because the FDIC wasn't satisfied with any of the final bids).

The media reports indicate that there will be an announcement before Asian markets open Monday morning. Some of them are closed for the May 1 holiday, so the FDIC might get a couple more hours than usual. Final bids are reportedly due to the FDIC by Sunday noon Eastern U.S. Time (midnight early morning Monday here in Singapore).

First Republic Bank is a super regional bank in the United States, but it has a rather odd assortment of states where it does business. For anti-trust reasons I think PNC (or another regional bank) makes more sense as the acquiring bank, but we'll see. First Republic Bank's share price has crashed already, and it's likely shareholders will be wiped out.

Insured deposits are already FDIC guaranteed. But I think uninsured deposits will also be kept whole given the recent SVB precedent. That's even more likely if another bank acquires First Republic Bank.

The stock prices of some other regional U.S. banks have been wobbling a bit given shareholder fears of other bank failures. This situation is pretty weird, though. These banks are very well capitalized, but no bank can withstand a bank run if it's big and fast enough. At this point I'm not that concerned, and even if I were concerned I don't think I'd be doing anything different.

Whenever a bank fails in the U.S. insured depositors aren't impacted. It's really quite smooth. I've mentioned before that I was a depositor at a bank that was closed on a Friday afternoon by the FDIC. Nothing really happened from my point of view. All the essential services like ATMs and debit cards kept working. By Monday morning the acquiring bank had hung temporary signs, and the failed bank's branches were suddenly new branches with the acquiring bank's logo. That's one advantage of a gigantic financial market with literally thousands of banks: the regulator has some practice. It's really quite amazing how smooth the process is for bank customers, at least the ones with insured deposits.

Why First Republic Won’t Likely Ruin Your Weekend​

What crisis? It’s small enough to fail, and the risk already looks priced in. Plus, banks don’t matter as much as they used to.

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/a...sn-t-matter-that-much?leadSource=uverify wall
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,027
Reaction score
5,285
JPMorgan is taking over First Republic Bank. That makes some sense since JPMorgan had already helped First Republic. The FDIC estimates its deposit insurance fund will need to cover US$13 billion of losses. That’s significant but easily handled.

JPMorgan Chase is assuming all deposits (insured and uninsured) and substantially all assets of First Republic Bank. It’s business as usual for FRB customers, and soon (within a few days probably; JPMorgan Chase would’ve prepared for this) they can also do business at all Chase branches.

Other bidders reportedly included PNC and Citizens, both large regional U.S. banks that evidently had aspirations of becoming national or near-national banks with this acquisition. But JPMorgan Chase apparently outbid them, which usually means the FDIC’s US$13 billion cost estimate was the lowest they could get. US Bancorp and Bank of America reportedly declined to bid. There might’ve been a sixth bank that the FDIC invited to bid.

JPMorgan Chase is the largest U.S. bank based on assets, and it’s now getting a little larger.
 
Last edited:

celtosaxon

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2018
Messages
1,799
Reaction score
882
JPMorgan is taking over First Republic Bank. That makes some sense since JPMorgan had already helped First Republic. The FDIC estimates its deposit insurance fund will need to cover US$13 billion of losses. That’s significant but easily handled.

JPMorgan Chase is assuming all deposits (insured and uninsured) and substantially all assets of First Republic Bank. It’s business as usual for FRB customers, and soon (within a few days probably; JPMorgan Chase would’ve prepared for this) they can also do business at all Chase branches.

Other bidders reportedly included PNC and Citizens, both large regional U.S. banks that evidently had aspirations of becoming national or near-national banks with this acquisition. But JPMorgan Chase apparently outbid them, which usually means the FDIC’s US$13 billion cost estimate was the lowest they could get. US Bancorp and Bank of America reportedly declined to bid. There might’ve been a sixth bank that the FDIC invited to bid.

JPMorgan Chase is the largest U.S. bank based on assets, and it’s now getting a little larger.

I’d only heard of First Republic because of a SF based credit card vlogger who used FRB as his primary account. It was one of the few prominent commercial banks (PNC and TD Bank being the other ones that I know of) that offered customers a pretty good ATM debit card — not as good as Schwab, but far above industry norms.

I’ve never had much love for Chase, as far as I can tell, their main qualities: big & impersonal… nothing else really stands out except maybe the Chase trifecta credit card strategy, which can generate a significant chunk of value for bigger spenders based in the US.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,027
Reaction score
5,285
First Republic Bank is the second largest bank to fail in U.S. history, although if you adjust for inflation it might move down the ranking a bit. But it’s a big one.
 

celtosaxon

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2018
Messages
1,799
Reaction score
882
First Republic Bank is the second largest bank to fail in U.S. history, although if you adjust for inflation it might move down the ranking a bit. But it’s a big one.

I wonder why the Fed’s stress testing of banks isn’t catching this earlier.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,027
Reaction score
5,285
I wonder why the Fed’s stress testing of banks isn’t catching this earlier.
Because there was nothing to catch. These banks were very well capitalized and at least reasonably well managed. Then the Fed started raising interest rates really fast, a great way to break even good banks.
 

xerone

Junior Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi BBCWatcher

I am looking to purchase a new property for my own stay. I have the option of (A) borrowing up to 75% of the purchase price for the new property; or (B) using the cash proceeds from the sale of my old house to significantly lower the amount I borrow.

Some thoughts on the the two options:

(A) means I get to use my cash proceeds for other purposes, e.g. invest in a long term portfolio (mix of VWRA and MBH) or hold them in short term instruments for liquidity or use part of it to build a safety buffer for instalment repayments in the event of unemployment. The hope of investing the proceeds is that the ROI will beat the interest rate payable on the housing loan. Essentially, I am converting my future income stream into a lump sum cash that I can deploy today.

(B) means I get to pay a significantly lower amount on my monthly mortgage instalments (and also less interest to the bank). Psychologically, this would give me less stress.

I have no current plans which would entail significant future expenses (such as acquiring a second property) and would be able to service the mortgage using my monthly salary. I still have a few decades to retirement.

Would be grateful for your views on which is the better option. Thanks!
 

iceblendedchoc

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
22,673
Reaction score
9,602
Channel News Asia published an opinion piece on bringing back some form of inheritance or estate tax in Singapore. In principle I’m in favor, but I don’t think it’s as complicated as the author suggests. The government has plenty of other tax rules that are more complicated. How about applying a minimum ABSD rate of, say, 20% to the portion of gifted or inherited property in excess of S$5 million or the ordinary ADSB rate, whichever is higher? The death of any beneficiary for a property held in trust would be deemed as a taxable event for these purposes.

The minimum ABSD on a $6 million home transferred (or deemed transferred) to an heir would be $200,000 (20% of the amount in excess of $5 million) per this rule.

A similar transfer tax rule could be applied to private automobiles on the residual value in excess of S$250,000. Inherit a Bugatti with 9 years to go on its COE? Tax will be owed.

Sure, some due diligence is required to make the rules reasonably tight, but these two transfer taxes shouldn’t be that complicated. I think I'd be in favor. I'd probably also favor a spousal exemption subject to a couple anti-abuse rules. Examples: Surviving spouse lives in the house, couple married for at least 3 years.
i prefer them to tax LKY's estate first and all other estate which escape when it was abolished.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
24,027
Reaction score
5,285
I am looking to purchase a new property for my own stay. I have the option of (A) borrowing up to 75% of the purchase price for the new property; or (B) using the cash proceeds from the sale of my old house to significantly lower the amount I borrow.
What's the best mortgage offer (interest rate and other terms)?
 

xerone

Junior Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
What's the best mortgage offer (interest rate and other terms)?
Fixed rates are currently around 3.6% for 2 years. Floating rates are around 3M-SORA (around 3.6%) + 0.55% for first 2 years. Lock-in is for two years (ie cannot prepay without penalty during the period).

Of course, how interest rates would move going forward is anyone’s guess.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top