watzup_ken
High Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2003
- Messages
- 25,671
- Reaction score
- 2,122
I feel that is the general misconception about HDR. You don't need 1000nits to have a good HDR experience. The trick is the blacks need to be black, and the bright areas need to be bright enough. If the screen is able to produce pitch blacks, even 400 to 500 nits is contrasty enough to have a great HDR experience. So OLED is usually the best option.quite confuse for me, reddit some said a huge different RT compare to non RT, but HDR look like benefit more on experience of gaming. But HDR you really need to have a monitor that can goes up to 1000 nits to enjoy HDR. Best experience still with OLED monitor.
RT and HDR are really 2 different kinds of eye candy. But I feel HDR is more impactful because actually don't need to hunt for the difference. If you have a device that uses an OLED panel, and you just play a HDR content, you can immediately tell the high contrast between the blacks and the whites in the video. Whereas RT, you generally need to hunt for differences in shadows, lighting and reflections, and without trained eyes, you likely can generally only tell the differences if you compare it side by side. At least this applies for me.
