SIA apologises to New Zealand couple seated next to passenger with dog

tripleme

Banned
Joined
Jan 29, 2021
Messages
16,433
Reaction score
18,664
SINGAPORE: Singapore Airlines (SIA) has apologised to a New Zealand couple after they were seated next to a passenger with a dog.

Gill and Warren Press were travelling on an SIA flight from Paris to Singapore in June when they found that the passenger in the premium economy seat next to them had a dog.

Mrs Press told New Zealand news website Stuff that she heard a "heavy snorting" noise. When the couple looked down, they realised it was the dog.

It was farting, occupying leg room and drooling onto her husband's leg, she added.

She said that she overheard the dog’s owner telling another passenger that he had the dog with him because he gets anxious.

The couple were moved to two seats in economy class after take-off, said SIA on Saturday (Sep 9) in response to CNA's queries.

After an email complaint, the airline offered each of them a S$100 voucher (US$73) KrisShop voucher. This was rejected by the couple.

SIA then upped their offer to a travel voucher of S$160 per person, but this was again rejected, reported Stuff.

The airline said on Saturday that it "endeavours to notify customers" who may be seated next to an assistance dog prior to boarding.

It added that when passengers request to be moved, they will be reseated in the same cabin if space permits.

"In this instance, we were unable to move Mr and Mrs Press within the same cabin as the premium economy class cabin was full.

"Our crew offered to move Mr and Mrs Press to two empty seats in economy class, which they accepted after take-off."

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/sin...new-zealand-couple-next-passenger-dog-3758696
 

cheongmanz

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
26,591
Reaction score
6,718
giphy.gif
 

Irenicus91

Banned
Joined
Apr 4, 2023
Messages
9,434
Reaction score
12,055
After an email complaint, the airline offered each of them a S$100 voucher (US$73) KrisShop voucher. This was rejected by the couple.

SIA then upped their offer to a travel voucher of S$160 per person, but this was again rejected, reported Stuff.
AMDK JSKM
 

amransan

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
22,659
Reaction score
30,098
my thinking i very simple do not cause others discomfort.

the passenger with the dog should buy extra seat for her dog if she want to have her dog beside her if not she can sit with the dog in a cage at the cargo.

i dont believe the reason people give just to bring along their pet so that they can sit with them.

the air stewardess should tell the dog owner sit at the empty seat in the economy class.

i can imagine how uncomfortable the other passengers especially the couple sitting beside the dog.

before ib say anything i have a dog at home and i will sent the dog to the dog hotel or get people to look after my dog of course i have to pay for their service.
 

topiari

Master Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Messages
4,475
Reaction score
823
Never hear anyone ask for apology?
people only asked for money back
 

topiari

Master Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Messages
4,475
Reaction score
823
Voucher/token of money does not mean admission of fault.

Once they apologise they admit fault and it sets a dangerous precedent elsewhere like US court 😎😎
Ah… that’s why certain Mins would not apologise no matter what happened
So no precedent in US courts
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top