[LIVE AS WE GO] Pritam Singh goes on trial for charges of lying to Parliament

[fire]

from red it

I'm beginning to have faith in this judge

 

[mryang]

Deputy Principal District Judge Luke Tan to review message logs alongside evidence from Yudhishthra Nathan

District Judge Luke Tan says that while the messages in question were sent after Oct 4, 2021, they might relate to the testimonies of Mr Yudishthra Nathan and Ms Loh Pei Ying about their meeting with Pritam Singh on October 12, 2021.

Mr Nathan and Ms Loh had testified in court that it was during this meeting that Singh told them he met Ms Raeesah Khan on Oct 3, 2021, and had told Ms Khan he would not judge her regardless of whether she maintained her lie or clarified it.

“So the issue of their credibility especially leading up to the 12th, and even on the 12th, is an issue. Because it goes to whether their evidence is to be believed or not,” says Judge Tan.

Deputy Attorney-General Ang Cheng Hock says “differences between them on the 12th is actually very narrow”, but adds that he will deal with this at the appropriate time.

He adds that the prosecution will present one set of unredacted messages from Mr Nathan from Oct 4 to Oct 12, as well as a set with redactions that was submitted to the Committee of Privileges, and the reasons for the redaction.

The Judge says he will need to review the documents alongside Mr Nathan’s evidence, before making a decision on the matter.

The hearing has ended for the day and will resume at 11am tomorrow.

 

[swiftblade]

Deputy Principal District Judge Luke Tan to review message logs alongside evidence from Yudhishthra Nathan

District Judge Luke Tan says that while the messages in question were sent after Oct 4, 2021, they might relate to the testimonies of Mr Yudishthra Nathan and Ms Loh Pei Ying about their meeting with Pritam Singh on October 12, 2021.

Mr Nathan and Ms Loh had testified in court that it was during this meeting that Singh told them he met Ms Raeesah Khan on Oct 3, 2021, and had told Ms Khan he would not judge her regardless of whether she maintained her lie or clarified it.

“So the issue of their credibility especially leading up to the 12th, and even on the 12th, is an issue. Because it goes to whether their evidence is to be believed or not,” says Judge Tan.

Deputy Attorney-General Ang Cheng Hock says “differences between them on the 12th is actually very narrow”, but adds that he will deal with this at the appropriate time.

He adds that the prosecution will present one set of unredacted messages from Mr Nathan from Oct 4 to Oct 12, as well as a set with redactions that was submitted to the Committee of Privileges, and the reasons for the redaction.

The Judge says he will need to review the documents alongside Mr Nathan’s evidence, before making a decision on the matter.

The hearing has ended for the day and will resume at 11am tomorrow.

Think some ppl gonna be scrambling to produce proper reasons for redaction liao.

 

[sales69]

PANG GANG LIAOOO

Before 5pm siu gang liao. 1st time in this trial?

 

[Shion]

+1 for the judge

 

[Kiwi8]

Means what sia, they not interested in finding out if the witnesses are credible?

the agenda is to fix Pritam, witness credibility is just secondary lah.

 

[Uproller]

wah so the messages will be produced. this is getting exciting

 

[yperic]

Deputy Principal District Judge Luke Tan to review message logs alongside evidence from Yudhishthra Nathan

District Judge Luke Tan says that while the messages in question were sent after Oct 4, 2021, they might relate to the testimonies of Mr Yudishthra Nathan and Ms Loh Pei Ying about their meeting with Pritam Singh on October 12, 2021.

Mr Nathan and Ms Loh had testified in court that it was during this meeting that Singh told them he met Ms Raeesah Khan on Oct 3, 2021, and had told Ms Khan he would not judge her regardless of whether she maintained her lie or clarified it.

“So the issue of their credibility especially leading up to the 12th, and even on the 12th, is an issue. Because it goes to whether their evidence is to be believed or not,” says Judge Tan.

Deputy Attorney-General Ang Cheng Hock says “differences between them on the 12th is actually very narrow”, but adds that he will deal with this at the appropriate time.

He adds that the prosecution will present one set of unredacted messages from Mr Nathan from Oct 4 to Oct 12, as well as a set with redactions that was submitted to the Committee of Privileges, and the reasons for the redaction.

The Judge says he will need to review the documents alongside Mr Nathan’s evidence, before making a decision on the matter.

The hearing has ended for the day and will resume at 11am tomorrow.

 

[lizzykai]

if tmrw found out that key messages related to the case was redacted... then hoseh liao

 

[tJ3333]

Before 5pm siu gang liao. 1st time in this trial?

Judge go home shiok shiok. DAG still need to prepare the docs to handover. damn shag.

 

[Kiwi8]

Siao eh the DAG argument is like just because of those dates, anything happen afterward not relevant? Simi ** logic is that?

dag logic is that any material that is not in favor of the agenda of fixing Pritam is to be considered irrelevant.

 

[yperic]

Will the unredacted version open a can of worm.

 

[carey]

I tot when they say redacted is mean blacken the printed version of the messages? But i see news is like deleting from phone?

If they delete front phone is very dumb

Redacted means blacked out

But you are not wrong - those jokers did go and delete the messages

 

[paperplane1943]

I tot YN say he redact messages by himself in carpark?

 

[lizzykai]

Before 5pm siu gang liao. 1st time in this trial?

because mcspicy 50% promo end before 5pm.. need to chop chop

 

[Kiwi8]

Not privy to the information about the messages

But from the defense's argument, it seems like they don't have a copy of the redacted messages, especially the reasons for them be redacted, suggesting these messages are not public information

exactly, and this seems to be very wrong in terms of the due court process. Some of the redacted material could have been useful in the defence's arguments.

 

[Eyelust]

To them, it is nothing bah

61.9% will continue to believe in them

This time I think less liao. Things like worse than last elections. Knn the cost of living now really is high like hell can, that is the main issue I think.

 

[fire]

Deputy Principal District Judge Luke Tan to review message logs alongside evidence from Yudhishthra Nathan

District Judge Luke Tan says that while the messages in question were sent after Oct 4, 2021, they might relate to the testimonies of Mr Yudishthra Nathan and Ms Loh Pei Ying about their meeting with Pritam Singh on October 12, 2021.

Mr Nathan and Ms Loh had testified in court that it was during this meeting that Singh told them he met Ms Raeesah Khan on Oct 3, 2021, and had told Ms Khan he would not judge her regardless of whether she maintained her lie or clarified it.

“So the issue of their credibility especially leading up to the 12th, and even on the 12th, is an issue. Because it goes to whether their evidence is to be believed or not,” says Judge Tan.

Deputy Attorney-General Ang Cheng Hock says “differences between them on the 12th is actually very narrow”, but adds that he will deal with this at the appropriate time.

He adds that the prosecution will present one set of unredacted messages from Mr Nathan from Oct 4 to Oct 12, as well as a set with redactions that was submitted to the Committee of Privileges, and the reasons for the redaction.

The Judge says he will need to review the documents alongside Mr Nathan’s evidence, before making a decision on the matter.

The hearing has ended for the day and will resume at 11am tomorrow.

At least he will review rather than reject outright

 

[footi3]

what a shietshow this witchhunt

 

[carey]

I'm beginning to have faith in this judge

Yes, so far, he is very on the ball and neutral