s-ghost
High Honorary Member
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2010
- Messages
- 153,594
- Reaction score
- 51,493
oh true alsotot ghost is omnipresent ??

oh true alsotot ghost is omnipresent ??

So in summary RK lied, LPY lied?
Jesus lah.tot ghost is omnipresent ??
RK is the one who said the leaders told her that right ?I don’t want to pre-judge, at the moment, those who lied had already owned up during COP and during court.
“Take it to the grave”: This was from RK when only. Loh could not confirm whether it was from the WP leaders or not. Nathan did not seek clarification from the WP leaders when he had the opportunity to meet them face-to-face.
still have meh? thought is yesterday only?Want to treat fish burger at McDonald's...sigh... today got 1 for 1 right?
Then today what got 1 for 1...still have meh? thought is yesterday only?
RK is the one who said the leaders told her that right ?
Then the COP sue Pritam cos he cannot prove he did not tell her that.
Thought should be RK prove that Pritam got really tell her that instead ?
is like my colleague tell my boss i tell him something when I never. then my boss check with me but instead believe my colleague instead, cos i cannot prove i did not tell my colleague that thing. how to prove a thing which i never tell him..
samurai beef burgerThen today what got 1 for 1...
Lai let go together latersamurai beef burger
Hope the judge don't lao hongSigh ...now DAG trying to say don't put COP people integrity and professionalism link to this court cases.
The system needs to be tested. Even they also are newSigh ...now DAG trying to say don't put COP people integrity and professionalism link to this court cases.
"Pritam cannot prove he did not tell her"....reminded me of some comedy that I watched - The customer service asked the customer to prove he did not received the deliveries.RK is the one who said the leaders told her that right ?
Then the COP sue Pritam cos he cannot prove he did not tell her that.
Thought should be RK prove that Pritam got really tell her that instead ?
is like my colleague tell my boss i tell him something when I never. then my boss check with me but instead believe my colleague instead, cos i cannot prove i did not tell my colleague that thing. how to prove a thing which i never tell him..
what do you expect? for example, ah gong already said multiple times during interviews that he wanted to demolish his house. but yet the jokers in charge are now pretending that ah gong suddenly didnt want to demolish. singapore is very lucky to have leaders who are even more powerful than david copperfield, can magically change white to black, and black to white. in fact, more powerful than thanos with the reality stone!is like my colleague tell my boss i tell him something when I never. then my boss check with me but instead believe my colleague instead, cos i cannot prove i did not tell my colleague that thing. how to prove a thing which i never tell him..
call them naive and incompetent is fair game rite........Sigh ...now DAG trying to say don't put COP people integrity and professionalism link to this court cases.
Now more people know what is going on .call them naive and incompetent is fair game rite........
EDMW famous quote : "you say, he say, who confirm" applied.RK is the one who said the leaders told her that right ?
Then the COP sue Pritam cos he cannot prove he did not tell her that.
Thought should be RK prove that Pritam got really tell her that instead ?
is like my colleague tell my boss i tell him something when I never. then my boss check with me but instead believe my colleague instead, cos i cannot prove i did not tell my colleague that thing. how to prove a thing which i never tell him..