[Official] Tan See Leng MEGA Thread

[DigDub]

Please don't disrespect Cantonese lah. People don't understand despite you talking means you are doing a poor job of explaining. Giving that holier than thou attitude as usual.

 

[jeffprobst]

we want to know the pure species. is it so hard to show us those stats instead of dragging it?

 

[MynameisS]

Note that its 63% of "GROWTH" ​

It's not the ACTUAL % of PMET jobs held by local born ​

​

Also how did they get 63% of growth, when the following is also released by them:

In 2023, a staggering 94.5% of new jobs went to non-Singaporeans, sparking debate. The government's hesitancy to provide detailed employment breakdowns of Singaporeans and Permanent Residents raises concerns about the true impact on Singaporean workers in a rapidly changing job market.

gaslighting

outright lying

massaging statistics till they suit their viewpoint

disrespecting anybody who asks questions

these are the common tactics of the ruling party

 

[Ahdaii]

But in that movies both Jacky Cheung and Andy Lau are brothers leh

 

[charleslee1989]

Your guess is as gd as mine.

From this non-POFMA-ed article,

https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/20...oned-1-in-3-new-pmets-were-just-reclassified/

"Dr Tan briefly acknowledged that 1 in 3 of the increase in resident PMETs came from non-PMETs being “upgraded” to PMET roles."


so 1 in 3 of the growth was reclassified???

 

[pohw0008]

Ok leh.

63% of 382,000 is 240,660.

This works out to 24k PMET jobs going to locally born Sinkie every year from 2014 to 2024.

Considering there are only around 30+k live births in SG each year, it is not bad.

High chance they use 10 years to make the figures better anyway should compare to birth rate 20-30 years ago.. in year 1990 it was about 60k.. in year 2000 the total number of births was about 40k.. so actually the number is very low?? How come so little Singapore getting new pmet job.. there should be about 500k people borned from year 1990 to 2000..

 

[MrAppleCrumble]

Since when parliament can speak dialect? Won't get punished or double standard? Next time ******* also can say out ah

 

[Eliwood]

From this non-POFMA-ed article,

https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/20...oned-1-in-3-new-pmets-were-just-reclassified/

"Dr Tan briefly acknowledged that 1 in 3 of the increase in resident PMETs came from non-PMETs being “upgraded” to PMET roles."


so 1 in 3 of the growth was reclassified???

Actually i think this point in the article is impt. Tbh classification is not the most impt point. What matters more is whether real income has increased.

"Instead of widespread job creation, the data suggests that many workers were simply moved from one employment category to another, without significant improvements in wages or career opportunities."

So it is gd that real median income has increased. Whatever classification is not as impt as this metric.

 

[DW]

Is this the type of ppl u wan in parliament? Why cant just give clear data?

Because pap knows who's really taking all our good jobs

 

[sciprof]

40% foreign PMET. thats alot leh

 

[Eliwood]

High chance they use 10 years to make the figures better anyway should compare to birth rate 20-30 years ago..

Very likely.

Citizen live birth has hovered around 30k since 2001. Before 2001 was above 40k. Above 50% also not too bad.

https://tablebuilder.singstat.gov.sg/table/TS/M810761

 

[Travis_Touchdown]

Is this the type of ppl u wan in parliament? Why cant just give clear data?

Social compact...

 

[zhoholang]

Good code of conduct

 

[Ghostpel]

Where did he get data from?

Not sure… I deleted my post, in case profmah.

 

[Medicated Oil]

There is no need to respond.
His time will come soon.

 

[s-ghost]

let the poll results speak, he don't need to rebut

 

[vee4044]

Good code of conduct

In mind diu Tan Ser leng... Ah neh importer.

 

[Courage]

I will vote Tan See Leng out for lack of respect and decorum in parliament

 

[mryang]

Questioning Dr. Tan See Leng’s Claim: Who Really Benefited from PMET Job Growth?

Dr. Tan See Leng claims that 63% of resident PMET growth (2014-2024) came from local born Singaporeans but does the data actually support this?

Let’s break it down:

843,400 work permit holders (excluding domestic workers)—a record high, 17% above pre-pandemic levels.

318,222 new PRs & 219,781 new citizens (2014-2023)—how many of them were counted as "local PMET growth"?

Employment Pass & S Pass holders grew by 38,000—but what about work permit holders & other pass conversions?

Total employment growth (27,300 in 2Q 2023) was entirely from non-residents—does "solely" mean zero jobs for Singaporeans?

Foreign employment growth has surged:

2022: 88.5% of 227,800 jobs went to non-residents

1Q 2023: 91.5% of 33,000 jobs went to non-residents

2Q 2023: 100% of 27,300 jobs went to non-residents

If Singaporeans are seeing declining resident employment change (first time since 2Q 2020), then how credible is the claim that 63% of PMET job growth went to local-born Singaporeans?

Are we being told the full picture, or are the numbers being redefined to mask the reality?

#SGJobs #SingaporeansFirst #TruthBehindTheNumbers

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/15wyasSTnM/

 

[Jerroldscv]

i wish the camera got show whether the speaker is laughing together anot also
that will be shamefgul