[CONSOLIDATED] Singapore General Election 2025 Discussion Thread

[jericho75]

Queen of eggs maybe

 

[iammole]

mah bo tan destroyed housing

amy khor destroyed hawker

lhl destroyed Singapore

 

[mgx-alander]

queen of votes? cos of her opponent beh kan ba

 

[EXIDBeast]

Still don't know why this jhb can come up with shiat policies and get away with it. Hong kah residents please do due diligence to get her out

 

[Eureka75]

Ali baba goh meng seng thinks he is commander in chief anyhow carve up spore and proclaim its his. Hope wp fight all 95seats and let all of them one time lose all deposit. Why wp need gv them face?

WP should ga ga come in to make this big mouthed UFO man lose his deposit

 

[Eureka75]

Chee Hong T
Eggmy Khor
Disgracefu
Tan See Leng
Jo Teo

 

[Orionz]

What was the flaw ah

On 5 February 2018, Home Affairs and Law Minister K Shanmugam said in Parliament that the CHC sentences are too low, and “will move to ensure legislation provides for higher penalties for senior officers who commit criminal breaches of trust (CBT)”.

This comes after the apex court ruled that the six CHC leaders should not be convicted for aggravated CBT and would not have to spend additional time behind bars. The shorter sentence was due to a new interpretation of the Penal Code section governing CBT offences, which led to the Court of Appeal ruling that company directors, governing board members or key officers of charities and officers of societies who commit CBT could be jailed up to seven years. This is in comparison to employees being liable for a maximum 15 years imprisonment.

Said Mr Shanmugam on the Government’s position on the verdict: “The Government’s policy is clear: If you are a senior officer, director in the organisation, you are in a position of greater trust. You have considerable authority to make decisions in relation to the organisation’s assets. If you abuse that trust, you should be more culpable, and you should be liable for more severe punishments, compared with an ordinary employee.”

Mr Tong responded by saying that “there’s a flaw in the law because the law was not changed from many years ago”, but he “focused on what the legal provisions were”.

He added that he and his colleagues “saw the gap and argued it early on”, pointing out that “the provision the prosecution sought to use was inappropriate that in fact, the right provision should have been the one several notches lower and that would necessarily mean that even if there was a conviction, the penalty could not exceed a certain level”.

 

[virtualape]

EVERYONE OF THEM. GOTTA TAKE OUT THE TRASH.

Drain the swamp...

Tsl. Once he goes, they will know people can't accept not getting decent paying jobs. Not only for themselves but for their kids.

Hopefully whoever replace him will put sinkies priority no. 1 without being xeno or nativist.

 

[zeebjii]

GMS like Lim Tean and KJ only know how to talk big big as keyboard warrior

you may not like them, keyboard warrior is the last thing you can accuse them of. They stood in elections, made social medias videos and kena Pofma many times

 

[mynickname]

I tot he retired from politics and moved to hk permanently

 

[Evil_Boss]

On 5 February 2018, Home Affairs and Law Minister K Shanmugam said in Parliament that the CHC sentences are too low, and “will move to ensure legislation provides for higher penalties for senior officers who commit criminal breaches of trust (CBT)”.

This comes after the apex court ruled that the six CHC leaders should not be convicted for aggravated CBT and would not have to spend additional time behind bars. The shorter sentence was due to a new interpretation of the Penal Code section governing CBT offences, which led to the Court of Appeal ruling that company directors, governing board members or key officers of charities and officers of societies who commit CBT could be jailed up to seven years. This is in comparison to employees being liable for a maximum 15 years imprisonment.

Said Mr Shanmugam on the Government’s position on the verdict: “The Government’s policy is clear: If you are a senior officer, director in the organisation, you are in a position of greater trust. You have considerable authority to make decisions in relation to the organisation’s assets. If you abuse that trust, you should be more culpable, and you should be liable for more severe punishments, compared with an ordinary employee.”

Mr Tong responded by saying that “there’s a flaw in the law because the law was not changed from many years ago”, but he “focused on what the legal provisions were”.

He added that he and his colleagues “saw the gap and argued it early on”, pointing out that “the provision the prosecution sought to use was inappropriate that in fact, the right provision should have been the one several notches lower and that would necessarily mean that even if there was a conviction, the penalty could not exceed a certain level”.

Eh that’s what a good lawyer does can’t fault him for that.

 

[86technie]

Jo jo lo must be first to go.
I wonder who will contest against her.

 

[Orionz]

Eh that’s what a good lawyer does can’t fault him for that.

Will do anything / defend anyone for money = gg sinkies

 

[LoaGong12]

josephine, see leng, edwin, lim tean, goh meng seng,

 

[carlongerdidu93]

Tampines Group Representation Constituency

Electorate	147,904

Seats	5

Tampines GRC changes

Tampines Changkat SMC carved out. Absorbs Tampines West polling districts from Aljunied GRC.

 

[batuchka]

nothing can beat PM losing his MP seat

maybe can play acoustic guitar song when hand over new PM

 

[LoaGong12]

you may not like them, keyboard warrior is the last thing you can accuse them of. They stood in elections, made social medias videos and kena Pofma many times

i don’t see how you can respect lim tean. dodgy af bugger in every sense of the work
goh meng seng - ok at least he sticks around. just weird beliefs

 

[mansae]

1. Ong Ye Kung (will not forget his jab mandates)
2. Tan See Leng
3. Vivian Balakrishnan
4. Chee Hong Tat (just cos he's a horrible person. iykyk.)

 

[the_dog]

"As for the elderly man in the video who appeared to raise his middle finger, it was also clarified by the original videographer that the mood was entirely cordial."

what kind of clarification is this?

Clarify own doubt

 

[batuchka]

must promote the "right" party mah cos they have every aspect of life here insai pocket