
I think hdb is also nuclear nuke proof!Earthquakes work differently. 1300km can shake down a building whilst at 400km it has no effect on HDBs
The aftershock exposed Thailand's weak constructions
The Italian-thai development company is the joint venture main contractor. According to wiki the construction company was founded by an Italian and thai so named Italian-thai.within china they are blaming the italian architect design now
Yes, didn't manage to get to hospital in time.By "didn't manage to make it", means RIP?![]()
thais realising something wrong liao.....1990 built 烂尾 still standing tall while the new govt admin building collapse so easily
so actually those rooftop pools got glass fence
but it wasn't strong enough to withstand the moving water, so it broke
p/s: the two people did escape
Modern skyscrapers exterior "wall" is non load bearing. Mostly aluminum cladding and glass windows. One of the video can see the lower floors blue cladding panels or windows buckled and peeled away from the building as it collapsed.Can not compare. There are many reasons. Below are 2 simple logic.
- one is old building that is build and cement had set for long time. The other is newly build and cement might not had fully set yet.
- the old build is almost complete with exterior walls for extra support. The new building doesn't.
Had the building been completed, it is unlikely to collapse.
An architect will be able to explain more to you.
Can not compare. There are many reasons. Below are 2 simple logic.
- one is old building that is build and cement had set for long time. The other is newly build and cement might not had fully set yet.
- the old build is almost complete with exterior walls for extra support. The new building doesn't.
Had the building been completed, it is unlikely to collapse.
An architect will be able to explain more to you.
Edmw many architect experts saying otherwise leh. Which one is true?Can not compare. There are many reasons. Below are 2 simple logics.
- one is old building that is build and cement had set for long time. The other is newly build and cement might not had fully set yet.
- the old building is almost complete with exterior and internal walls for extra support. The new building doesn't.
Had the building been completed, it is unlikely to collapse.
An architect will be able to explain more to you.
Zero load should be stronger but the crane quite heavy and highEdmw many architect experts saying otherwise leh. Which one is true?
1)skeleton frame building easier to tou
2)fully completed building easier to toto