[GE2025] Mediacorp Live Roundtable Debate, 27 April 2025 8pm

Status
Not open for further replies.

krikering

Master Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2021
Messages
3,544
Reaction score
3,775
This is the word for word paragraphs mentioned by WP in the WP paper in 2019:

Resident population growth has been approximately 30,000 a year since 2010 and 2011. Assuming an average household size of 3.3, this would mean that around 9,000 or so new dwelling units are required annually. Completions within the same time period have far exceeded the resident population growth. Private vacancies have only started to inch down, but there are still around 12,000 private units completing up to 2022. Will the HDB have a vacancy rate problem, compounded by a still steady stream of 16,000 to 17,000 BTO units in the last few years, which will continue to increase supply up to 2022?

BTO projects should continue, but, rather than creating too many new towns, planners would do well to consider, in future, partly meeting demand from new family formation by selling balance flats in mature estates acquired under the Universal Sale and Lease Back scheme or USB (see previous chapter). This would help advance urban renewal in the mature estates where many Singapore [sic] desire to live, since these are nearer to the city centre.
HDB themselves also went ahead to cut supply from 25000 per year to 16000 per year previously. That means they admitted that they were wrong too.
 

itedino

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2003
Messages
18,274
Reaction score
6,215
LT should just go berserk, luckily SDP not invited. Got time to do their rally at Sun Plaza, what a waste of time. Debate, more like reading manifestos only.
Not exciting

Lawrence Wong last time say in forum Dr Chee got tradition of backstabbing.
 

mgx-alander

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2008
Messages
96,116
Reaction score
14,216
Use Chatgpt. It will quote you the sources. This was part of what it mentioned.
The Workers' Party (WP) did propose reducing the number of Build-To-Order (BTO) flats during the COVID-19 period. In 2019, the WP released a working paper titled Counting Down to Zero: Are There Alternatives to VERS?, which recommended cutting back the annual BTO supply to 9,000 units, down from the 16,000 to 17,000 flats that were being built at the time.

Please read paper in full
https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/...05b_WP-Working-Paper-on-HDB-Resale-Prices.pdf

building less BTO is because of UBS, not just stop building BTOs
 

Pyroxene

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2016
Messages
513
Reaction score
256
PSP and WP directly addressed and answered the questions posed to them. Michael Thng (WP representative) in particular was very impressive and articulated his points extremely well. Stephanie (PSP) had to keep referring to her prepared script.

Lim Tean and Ravi just mostly repeated their parties' talking points without answering the questions. Basically they were opposing for the sake of opposing.

Chee Hong Tat had a very good performance too. Fleshed out the ruling party's stance and policies and addressed the questions posed to him. Of course he also had the advantage of having 4x the time compared to the other panelists...
 

NTB2DO

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
20,463
Reaction score
3,382
Just on this did a quick glance through. Remembered some of them

1,2 are valid; 3,4,5 are mostly peripheral and trying to fight for the environment to me not super important

6 is valid but I remember that speech as very theory and not to the point

The ntuc one was retrospective and he didn’t push further

I think if you’re talking about making in roads, psp did more than wp in this term

I don’t subscribe to enemy of my enemy is my friend. I rather if the candidates did well they did well.

I was responding to your comment that he 'score a home run then disappear for 5 years fighting woke'..

So scary this kind of perception.

score a home run then disappear for 5 years fighting woke.

I hope they live up to their names

LMW is good. This I agree.
 

coyote

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
76,810
Reaction score
24,378
This type of roundtable wayang joke only make me wanna vote OPP, it also paint cht like a weakling reading from iPad prepared script.

Not really. It showed us very clearly the different leagues between the parties and the calibres of the candidates... Which parties have shorter sights, which party is too focus on attacking others and forgotten to explain why people should vote for them. WP shines above the rest of the oppositions obviously.👍
 
Last edited:

Chocoholicxx

Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2008
Messages
434
Reaction score
158
HDB themselves also went ahead to cut supply from 25000 per year to 16000 per year previously. That means they admitted that they were wrong too.
I feel WP didn't really directly ask for a reduction of BTO supply, rather it seems more like it should be a mixture of new supply + reclaiming back existing flats through schemes to give a more well balanced localization; a mixture of new estates + mature estates to offer to new homeowners.
 

coldish

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2008
Messages
38,147
Reaction score
8,212
Each of them could have just published their responses. What for waste time for each person to narrate one by one.

What a joke.

At least the session made one thing obvious. That anyone who watched it will question why CHT has so much more time and always have the last say.
The roundtable was made a platform for PAP to showcase what they have to say is always right.

Having more oppies parties this time is just an convenient excuse that they allow more voice to be heard.
 

eeLoyH

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2001
Messages
14,560
Reaction score
5,806
I am here long enough what kind of posts you have and what your intentions are. Saying this doesn't mean I am being personal but am I right to say that you know it jolly well. What posts you have to say you are objective, neutral and not biased at all? Did u ever once say WP is right and done well ?

You can say anything about WP likewise I do for pap so it is a zero sum issue.

Again, u can say anything about Jamus and others n I have proved to u otherwise. Instead of taking it objectively, what did u do? Don't say I want to say u this n but u did behave that way.
Can you just even refer to the posts I made in this thread before replying?

seriously you prefer to have this preconceived impression and stick to it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top