6-day EWL disruption in Sep. 2024 caused by 'rare' & 'catastrophic' mechanical failure: LTA, SMRT

yperic

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
83,164
Reaction score
30,898


Transport operator SMRT will be fined S$3 million for the major East-West Line disruption last September. After about eight months of investigations, The Land Transport Authority said the likely cause of the incident was degraded grease in the axle box.

An axle box sits below a train carriage, allowing wheels to rotate smoothly on tracks. In the September 2024 incident, the axle box got dislodged and eventually, the train led to the damage of over two kilometres of track. Nadirah Zaidi reports.





On Sep. 25, 2024, a dislodged axle box caused the wheels of a train to fall off, damaging tracks on the East-West Line between Dover and Ulu Pandan Depot.

This left train services between Jurong East and Buona Vista disrupted for six days.

According to the Land Transport Authority (LTA), the failure was likely caused by degraded grease in the axle box, which could have worsened the wear and tear on the axle bearings.

LTA intends to impose a S$3 million fine on SMRT, which will go to the Public Transport Fund to help lower-income families with public transport fees.

In determining the penalty fee, LTA said it took into consideration that SMRT had borne the cost of repairs, provision of free bridging buses and regular bus services, as well as shuttle train services at the affected stations.

SMRT had also provided free travel to passengers alighting at Jurong East and Buona Vista stations during the disruption.

The total costs amounted to over S$10 million, LTA said.

Videos by Mothership.

The train has since been decommissioned

image


The six-day disruption of the East-West Line (EWL) in September 2024 was caused by an uncommon mechanical failure.

In a Jun. 3 statement, LTA released a summary of the findings of the investigation, which was conducted with an expert panel.

While the investigations found that SMRT staff responded to the situation “appropriately”, it also acknowledged a breach of license that contributed to the disrupted service.

Here’s what happened.

What happened​

The disruption was caused by a damaged axle box, a component in the train that allows the wheels to rotate smoothly.

This resulted in “extreme heat” being generated, igniting and burning off pieces of rubber in the axle box.

As the train travelled from Jurong East to Clementi, some people reported a “burning smell”.

Smoke was also observed in the cabin.

After the station manager confirmed this, controllers instructed the captain to take the train out of service.

About 850 commuters were detrained and guided to Clementi MRT station.

SMRT then withdrew the train towards the nearest depot, Ulu Pandan Depot, for assessment.

According to LTA, on-site inspection of potentially damaged trains, for example at MRT stations, is not feasible due to insufficient space on the platform and viaduct.

However, near Dover station, the axle box was dislodged and fell off the train. The wheels of the third train-car subsequently came off the rails.

This caused “severe damage” to the rails and other equipment, which required six days of repairs.

Earlier, it was reported that 34 rail breaks were detected across 1.6km of tracks between Dover and Clementi stations.

Why it happened​

While a definitive cause was not identified as the axle box, bearings, and chevron spring debris were too badly damaged, the mechanism likely failed because of degraded grease, LTA said.

This led to increased friction in the axle box, and its subsequent overheating and failure.

Burnt rubber and metal pieces were later found in the train’s path — which pointed to an overheated axle box.

slide-6-damanged-chevron1.png

Burnt springs in the axle box. Photo from LTA

In addition, prior to the incident, elevated temperatures were detected in the axle box.

Temperature logs from earlier that day found that the axle box had a temperature of 118°C — significantly higher than the typical operating temperature of 65°C.

But due to a system issue, the incident train could not be identified and action could not be taken promptly.

In the days prior, the temperature was also “slightly elevated”, but still within operating thresholds.

Could it have been avoided?​

The train in question — which has since been decommissioned — was part of the first-generation Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI) fleet.

It had been in service for over 35 years at the time of the incident, and was last overhauled in July 2018.

Initially, the KHI fleet was supposed to be replaced by new Movia trains by March 2024.

But this was delayed due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Because of this, SMRT continued to regularly maintain and overhaul its existing KHI fleet.

SMRT also twice extended the overhaul interval for the incident train.

Initially, the train had to be maintained after logging 500,000km. This was later extended to 575,000km in August 2022, and 750,000km in August 2024.

At the time of the incident, the train had logged 690,000km.

In addition, as axle box failures are not common, SMRT had not undertaken a detailed engineering and risk assessment on the overhaul interval required for the axle box.

The degraded grease hence went unnoticed.

slide-6-damaged-axle-front.png
Damaged axle box. Photo from LTA

“Had the incident train been overhauled in a more timely manner, the condition of its axle box assemblies would have been checked and any degraded grease could have been replaced earlier,” LTA said.

Lam Sheau Kai, president of SMRT Trains, said that while "similar axle box dislodgement incidents have occurred in other metro systems", these are "extremely rare, sudden, and catastrophic" incidents.

On the overhaul regime, he said their “overhaul regime has served us well over the past 38 years".

But what may have caught them "off-guard" this time was a convergence of factors.

These include delays in new train deliveries due to Covid-19, their efforts to "balance and adjust overhaul schedules", and the lag in receiving "critical spare parts".

He noted that for rare, black swan events like Covid-19, it is important that "SMRT and LTA, operator and asset owner, should come together to reassess collectively".

"In hindsight, we could perhaps have exercised greater caution in how we managed the transition and decommissioning of the older trains.”

What now?​

As a result of the breach that led to the disruption, LTA will impose a financial penalty of S$3 million on SMRT.

In determining the quantum, LTA acknowledged that SMRT bore the cost of repairs, free bridging and shuttle services, and free travel to passengers alighting at Jurong East and Buona Vista.

In total, this amounted to over S$10 million.

SMRT’s service recovery was also determined to have been managed “satisfactorily”, LTA said.

This included the prompt activation of bridging shuttle buses, shuttle trains and so on.

The financial penalty collected will go to the Public Transport Fund to help lower-income families with their public transport expenditures, LTA said.

Moving forward, SMRT has implemented a system to detect abnormal axle box temperatures.

It has also reduced the speed for trains being withdrawn back to the depot from 70km/h to 35km/h, “to limit any potential damage to the tracks and trackside equipment”.

SMRT, LTA, and the National Transport Workers’ Union have set up a workgroup to review and enhance systems.

It has also engaged overseas metro operators in Guangzhou and Taipei for “mutual learning”, LTA said.

Mothership has reached out to SMRT for comment.

Top image from SMRT/Facebook and LTA

 
Last edited:

Chalkycliffs

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
9,622
Reaction score
4,026
Cannot do overmaintenance...

They didn't even do the maintenance.

This is incompetence at its finest.

Criminal neglect at worst.

Since company directors are now liable to be held personally responsible with fines and jail terms, why are SMRT directors not being held accountable?
 
Last edited:

AndroidComa

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2021
Messages
14,298
Reaction score
6,870
in the end
who suffer?
commoners suffer
those who need to take MRT suffers
fine SMRT whatever amount they still gotta balance their P&L and will come and ask for fare increase come december
in the end who suffers?
and we know our MOT will just blanket approve everything
 

AndroidComa

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2021
Messages
14,298
Reaction score
6,870
Fine only 3 million.
If fine is cheaper than maintenance costs, it is better to just keep paying fine
same like any SME bosses nowadays
safety inspection, allocate 5k for fines per year liao for small small offenses
if control measure cost more than the penalty then it will not be implemented
 

Asy1um

Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2010
Messages
6,443
Reaction score
5,742
So can give smrt a super rare fine?
Like one trillion dollar, so we can change operator
 

ShinnAsuka

Master Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2007
Messages
4,665
Reaction score
2,716
Cannot do overmaintenance...

They didn't even do the maintenance.

This is incompetence at its finest.

Criminal neglect at worst.

Since company directors are now liable to be held personally responsible with fines and jail terms, why are SMRT directors not being held accountable?
If they had wanted to “over”maintain, would have discovered earlier and took action?

now blame covid
 

Cowbellc

Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
8,233
Reaction score
3,904
of cos it's rare lah, if common we all mati liao🤣
3 mil fine, left hand to right hand, did sinkies benefit fm it?
Afterall mrt was built using whose money?
 

TheSexposed

Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2010
Messages
6,528
Reaction score
1,250
they heng the derailed train didnt happen with passengers on-board and subsequently fell down to the ground level causing mass casualty.

Incompetence at its finest. Earn so much profit yearly but save on maintenance. Somemore our stupid train system does not have redundant track in case of failure like this. Still up price every year

knnbcb...
 

ZaiNan

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2014
Messages
7,526
Reaction score
1,614
Only in SG the state media always portray such incident as out of this world, uncommon, rare and once in 50 years

Come on lah
 

coolmyth

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2006
Messages
54,938
Reaction score
9,145
This is what happens when they die die wanna push the lifespan of active trains to its max, then wanna arrange replacement swee swee like clockwork, when suddenly Covid hits then hallelujah!

Give the guy who suggested blaming Covid an A and a big bonus! :LOL:
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top