[GLGT] Minister Ong Ye Kung Responds to KF Seetoh’s Untrue Claims About Bukit Canberra Hawker Centre

krikering

Master Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2021
Messages
3,463
Reaction score
3,676
It is just passing the buck to the tenants.
Maybe it is another case of "mis-communication" again like the IC number saga.
Really jialat, anyone with common sense know that the responsibility is due to the operators (Canopy Hawkers Group)

and relevant authorities (NEA, etc.) for coming out with this silly not well thought-out initiative.

Still want to pass the bucks onto the tenants.
 

Medicated Oil

Honorary Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
149,022
Reaction score
62,165
Really jialat, anyone with common sense know that the responsibility is due to the operators (Canopy Hawkers Group)

and relevant authorities (NEA, etc.) for coming out with this silly not well thought-out initiative.

Still want to pass the bucks onto the tenants.
I dunno what is inside the rental agreement.
It could be a case of offering them lower rent but the tenants have to offer 30 free meals per month.
But, the operator are also adding other "costs" and "rental" too.

As for the unit in charge, dun think they really care as long as the operator pay them the monthly rental for the HC and the social initiatives are fulfilled.
As I mentioned earlier, no one is following up on the social initiatives not being performed.
 

krikering

Master Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2021
Messages
3,463
Reaction score
3,676
I dunno what is inside the rental agreement.
It could be a case of offering them lower rent but the tenants have to offer 30 free meals per month.
But, the operator are also adding other "costs" and "rental" too.

As for the unit in charge, dun think they really care as long as the operator pay them the monthly rental for the HC and the social initiatives are fulfilled.
As I mentioned earlier, no one is following up on the social initiatives not being performed.
They classify some expenses under "Miscelleaneous". Quite telling liao, KF Seetoh only came out with the agreement because hawkers highlighted to him. Apparently, their profit margins very low but Canopy Hawker Group is really huat.
 

Medicated Oil

Honorary Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
149,022
Reaction score
62,165
They classify some expenses under "Miscelleaneous". Quite telling liao, KF Seetoh only came out with the agreement because hawkers highlighted to him. Apparently, their profit margins very low but Canopy Hawker Group is really huat.
The operator are still businessman.
They still need to pay the high rental to the unit in charge.
They have to get the money from the tenants and earn a profit from it.
Nothing social about it.
 

zueinder

Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
6,725
Reaction score
4,029
imagine if a Singaporean posted the same crap the polish guy did? Straight go to prison, kenna doxxed, etc etc.
 

Tabula Rasa

Master Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2023
Messages
3,976
Reaction score
2,719
no need respond to him. he juz keep insisting the statements from canberra is refuting although it basically says 70 for renting a space which agrees with what st was claiming. people block him bcos he kept going back on his circular logic, hoping to wear opponents out.....

That polish guy is another idiot.

Best is don't give him any attention.
 

krikering

Master Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2021
Messages
3,463
Reaction score
3,676
The operator are still businessman.
They still need to pay the high rental to the unit in charge.
They have to get the money from the tenants and earn a profit from it.
Nothing social about it.
Then don't do anything using the "social enterprise" name, just be frank and tell everyone that is capitalist and only doing all these for profits.

It is one thing to be upfront about doing it for the money, and another to earn some good public relations by doing all of these and force hawkers to absorb the costs.

Of course, the relevant authorities r.g NEA, etc. whom allowed all of this to happen whilst not putting in the proper controls to prevent the situation to deteriorate until so jialat is also responsible.

Now is only 1 Bukit Canberra Hawker Centre exposed nia, still got 10+ Hawker Centres until the ridiculous SEHC scheme. Hope KG Seetoh can find out more details on the others too.

Have to prevent hawkers from being exploited, and costs from being passed down onto consumers, etc.

The middle-man and the landlords (and those supporting them) are laughing all the way to the bank.

Probably thanking us for sponsoring their GCBs, Conti/BMWs, luxury good purchases, Expensive vacations overseas and their children/grandchildrens' PHDs/Masters at Ivy Leagues, etc.

They will receive their retributions one day.
 

kyang69

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
May 29, 2019
Messages
10,542
Reaction score
7,832
LMW and PSP really got 远见, started this issue earlier liao last year.

But I believe KF Seetoh then already got expressed his opinion, just that right now he manages to gather all necessary evidences to show the public.
You are right, it is often the Opposition MPs who raise issues that reflect concerns from the ground.

This raises the question: what role do the many P@P MPs in Parliament primarily serve?

The perception among some Singaporeans is that their presence seems geared more toward countering Opposition voices and ensuring government policies are pushed through Parliament smoothly, rather than engaging in balanced debate or addressing diverse viewpoints.

There have been instances where significant laws, such as POFMA, were passed with limited Opposition representation, leading to concerns about insufficient checks and balances. At times, policies appear to have been moved forward without thorough debate in the parliament, leaving segments of the public feeling sidelined and much to the chagrin of Singaporeans.

Such situations give rise to the impression that certain policies and legislations, like POFMA, may ultimately serve the interests of the ruling party more than those of the people.

But then, 65.5% liked to be screwed day in and day out by P@P. So, what can I say??
 

spunkbrat

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2012
Messages
10,346
Reaction score
5,835
Might as well give these sehc millions in grants to renovate and deep clean toilets too :rolleyes:
 

elloz123

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
1,231
Reaction score
726

Saw this really good take.
anyway state of sg is now “we” culture, compassion find the meaning of life. Now trying to get us into philosophy and arts because of late stage capitalism the capital owners are the real aristocrats.
 

tokong

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2015
Messages
46,437
Reaction score
14,580
In general, coffeeshop owners or management companies are earning millions. They don't want to reduce rent and don't want to fork out the money to charity free/cheap meals so they put the responsibilities on hawkers. Then it becomes the hawkers' problems, isn't it? Hawkers earn not enough still must do charity? You think all hawkers earn the same profit like 20k per month? minus away all raw ingredients and rent how much left you can calc one mah.

social enterprise is a convenient term to use in business. if u declare u are a social enterprise, you get the good impression that you are a good man or company who think for the society.

Just remove the words 'social enterprise'. It is an eyesore. You mean normal HC hawkers are not kind hearted and think of old ppl? it is the opposite, my pop said sometimes the auntie gave him two kalipok free to go with his afternoon kopi at his fav hc.

It is from the heart. why need to put that clause inside contract i don't understand.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top