Later, some one will post in her FB.stop digging la, later the father mother also come out
15% is ridiculous ...
I think such practice stems from all the malls too in sinkieland if not wrong ... landlords will take a certain percentage from the sales of successful businesses ... anyone can confirm if this were the common practice?
What's GREASE.Same as championing for GREASE movement in paying for plastic bag and chopping down more forests in the name of GROWTH.
Please la, they're running business. They franchise into 20 different chicken rice stall they got sympathise with you losing job to ft?As much as they signed with "open" eyes. Do they really have other choices ? Or they know every term in the contract.
HDB buyers also signed the 99 lease with "open eyes". Sprawling concrete is not HDB issue, etc.
As I mentioned in my previous comment, this social nonsense is created for the unit in charge to OUTSOURCE the HC operation.Since the operators are paid by NEA to run the SEHC, the social responsibility requirement is still there. Now they remove it from the hawker;s contract, I do hope the burden of this social responsibility to be bear by the operators, since they are paid by NEA, they made profit from rentals, cleaners, misc rental space for storage, and operating their own drink stall which probably the most profitable hawker in the centre.
I labelled it as GREASE.What's GREASE.
Has anyone measure how much increase in other disposable sales went up ?
Why should Timbre need to have a stake in their profitability?15% is not creaming of profits what, it's so that Timbre has a stake in the success or failure of the stall - which is exactly what a lot of hawker activists are asking for by the way. It forces Timbre to upkeep the place well, advertise or create activities to ensure footfall etc.
Would you rather they increase the rental by a fixed 15%?
Also, the 15 pages of fines, is basically just to clearly spell out what the transgressions are? Would you rather have a detailed black and white, or something ambiguous that comes back to pwn you later? And the transgressions listed are all quite reasonable?
Get your position straight before JJWW. Only makes the movement look like a fool.
I addressed this in my post.Why should Timbre need to have a stake in their profitability?
So they are shareholder of the stall ? They were paid a fee to manage the space. That is their contractual obligation with NEA. They have no business in taking a cut. Do they then supplement any other cost related to the hawkwer not fall under their NEA contract ?
Simple logic.If Singapore really wants to preserve its UNESCO hawker heritage, govt must lower the rent and manage all hawker centres like it had done before. Don’t outsource management to private sector. I have no idea why govt must outsource management of new hawker centers. The outcome is clear and obvious: rent and ancillary fees are going to kill our hawkers.
Thus, be prepared to lose our UNESCO hawker heritage. And lose the hearts of our citizens for accelerating the extinction of hawker trade.Simple logic.
If they are collecting higher rental from the operator and without the hassle, why not ?
Just let the operators do all the dirty work.