Our chatgpt says this.
The PIMCO Income Fund (whether in USD, SGD-hedged, or other share classes) is not a stock, but a bond/income-focused mutual fund. Its price (NAV) works very differently from equities.
Why it’s unlikely to go back to $11 easily
Bond yields and NAVs move inversely: When interest rates were very low (pre-2022), bond prices were high, and the fund’s NAV hovered around $11. As rates shot up, bond prices fell, and so did the fund’s NAV.
For the NAV to climb back to $11, we’d need a huge fall in interest rates globally — to levels similar to, or lower than, the 2020–2021 period. That scenario looks less likely unless there’s a severe recession or crisis.
Why it probably won’t “go to $1”
The fund is diversified across global fixed income, with active management by PIMCO.
It pays steady monthly distributions (which is the main appeal — income, not capital growth).
NAV erosion can happen gradually if distributions consistently exceed income (a “return of capital”), or if credit/default losses hit the portfolio. But a collapse toward $1 would imply catastrophic losses across hundreds of bonds — very unlikely unless PIMCO itself implodes.
What’s more realistic
The NAV may stay in a range around today’s levels (say $7–$9, depending on rates).
Investors generally hold this fund for the monthly income stream, not for NAV appreciation.
If rates are cut, NAV might recover some ground, but a full return to $11 would require extraordinary rate conditions.

Think of it this way:
Stocks → held for growth.
This fund → held for income + some stability, not for big price upside.