Yes, there’s been a noticeable uptick in
gutter politics rhetoric following Singapore’s 2025 General Election, especially during the recent October Parliament sittings.

Key Incidents:
- Race and religion controversies: Law Minister K. Shanmugam criticized the Workers’ Party (WP) for a delayed response to a self-styled preacher who allegedly tried to inject race and religion into the GE2025 campaign. He warned this could “confuse the ground” and undermine social cohesion.
- Ong Ye Kung’s warning: Health Minister Ong Ye Kung said Singapore came “dangerously close” to racial politics during GE2025. He emphasized the “dire and lasting” consequences if race and religion are allowed to shape political discourse.
- Parliamentary tone: These debates suggest a shift toward more confrontational and emotionally charged exchanges, with MPs calling out perceived lapses in political responsibility and social safeguards.

Broader Implications:
- The government appears to be drawing red lines around identity politics.
- Opposition parties are under pressure to clarify their positions and responses to sensitive issues.
- The tone reflects deeper anxieties about national unity and the boundaries of acceptable political discourse.
If you're tracking how this might affect future legislation or party strategies, I can help break that down too.