derrickgoh
High Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2000
- Messages
- 39,097
- Reaction score
- 13
I don't know about other banks but I'm surprised SC has no flexibility at all.
Thanks to its 3% cashback, the Manhattan World card is good for purchases of $3,000 and above. Well I have a purchase coming up that is almost $12,000 and naturally the card I thought of was the Manhattan World.
Problem is, I've charged quite a lot to my card already and there is no way I can add a charge of $12,000 as it will exceed my limit. So I emailed SC to ask if they could temporarily increase my limit for this month so I can make the purchase.
I even said I was prepared to pre-pay i.e. I do an online transfer of $12,000 to my Manhattan World account first if they are worried I am unable to pay that amount.
They said they do not allow temp CC credit increase for this reason. They will only allow if I am going overseas or for medical expenses. I found it weird because why does it matter what the purpose is? First of all its a temp increase for 1 month not a permanent increase. Secondly, why are they willing to increase if I am traveling but not for when I am buying an expensive item? Some more I told them I can prepay the amount if they are afraid I will abscond without paying.
When I asked these questions, they did not even bother to reply. Says a lot about how SC treats its customers I must say.
Anyway, I must thank SC. After this snub I just discovered that the maximum cashback I can get on my Manhattan World card is $200 per quarter. Had I charged the full $12,000 to my card, the 3% cashback would have been $360 but since their max is $200, I would have "lost" $160.
Suffice to say, when I realised this I made changes to my plan. I will now just charge $6,700 to my Manhattan World card which will give me $201 cashback. I just lose $1 which is no biggie.
And the remaining $5,300 I will charge to my ANZ Travel Card. With every $1 spent I get 1.4 points, so with $5,300 I get 7,420 points. Based on the cashback redemption rate of 7,000 points for $50, I will get $50. So total cash back for both cards combined would be $250.
So thank you SC for not being flexible and not even bothering to reply to my queries. I just managed to get an extra $50 cashback thanks to you. Too bad for you though. Assuming you get 2% admin fee for every transaction, you could have earned $240 if you had temp increased my limit. But because you didn't, you only earned $134.
But I guess $106 is peanuts to you. But think about it, if you earn $100 less from every other cardholder, this adds up. Perhaps if you revamped your way of doing things rather than laying off staff, you will not lose so much money and will not need to lay off so many staff.
Thanks to its 3% cashback, the Manhattan World card is good for purchases of $3,000 and above. Well I have a purchase coming up that is almost $12,000 and naturally the card I thought of was the Manhattan World.
Problem is, I've charged quite a lot to my card already and there is no way I can add a charge of $12,000 as it will exceed my limit. So I emailed SC to ask if they could temporarily increase my limit for this month so I can make the purchase.
I even said I was prepared to pre-pay i.e. I do an online transfer of $12,000 to my Manhattan World account first if they are worried I am unable to pay that amount.
They said they do not allow temp CC credit increase for this reason. They will only allow if I am going overseas or for medical expenses. I found it weird because why does it matter what the purpose is? First of all its a temp increase for 1 month not a permanent increase. Secondly, why are they willing to increase if I am traveling but not for when I am buying an expensive item? Some more I told them I can prepay the amount if they are afraid I will abscond without paying.
When I asked these questions, they did not even bother to reply. Says a lot about how SC treats its customers I must say.
Anyway, I must thank SC. After this snub I just discovered that the maximum cashback I can get on my Manhattan World card is $200 per quarter. Had I charged the full $12,000 to my card, the 3% cashback would have been $360 but since their max is $200, I would have "lost" $160.
Suffice to say, when I realised this I made changes to my plan. I will now just charge $6,700 to my Manhattan World card which will give me $201 cashback. I just lose $1 which is no biggie.
And the remaining $5,300 I will charge to my ANZ Travel Card. With every $1 spent I get 1.4 points, so with $5,300 I get 7,420 points. Based on the cashback redemption rate of 7,000 points for $50, I will get $50. So total cash back for both cards combined would be $250.
So thank you SC for not being flexible and not even bothering to reply to my queries. I just managed to get an extra $50 cashback thanks to you. Too bad for you though. Assuming you get 2% admin fee for every transaction, you could have earned $240 if you had temp increased my limit. But because you didn't, you only earned $134.
But I guess $106 is peanuts to you. But think about it, if you earn $100 less from every other cardholder, this adds up. Perhaps if you revamped your way of doing things rather than laying off staff, you will not lose so much money and will not need to lay off so many staff.


