WussRedXLi
Greater Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2001
- Messages
- 89,569
- Reaction score
- 9,829
****, I smell my just washed and wore once yesterday polo shirt, and it smells of smoke. 


Long time ago when i was still playing with hifi, i know that every doubling of the speakers/2X increase in power = +3dB.
Lets not talk about the LG LA-Q379/Samsung AX40.
We talking about the A50 and Xiaomi, which you have measured as 50dBA and 61dBA. And we treat it simply that we put into a normal room and assume little phase cancellation since it is "white noise" (it's definitely not sine wave!)
1 x A50 = 50dBA
2 x A50 = 53dBA
4 x A50 = 56dBA
8 x A50 = 59dBA
16 x A50 = 62dBA
You can safely saw that 10 units of A50 clustered together, in real life in a real big room sited at one end, sounds nearly the same as 1 x Xiaomi
Wish you can do the same for the AX40, but i don't reckon that you have one.
May I shd get a SPL meter from TB. Old one spoilt liao.
![]()
The AX40 only consumes 0.14kWH of electricity after being powered on High mode for 6 hours straight; that translates into $.02849 (based on Oct's tariff of $0.02035/kWH).
That means 0.023kWh...
****, I smell my just washed and wore once yesterday polo shirt, and it smells of smoke.![]()
For the same price for the xiaomi you can get AX40, which I wanted to buy at first but u it only has 2 speed modes is a deal breaker for me, the LG is probably better. I won't gun the xiaomi in jet/high mode or my A50 in high speed unless AQI reaches sub 300+.
On the side note, xiaomi uses sharp dust sensor for its reading.
Googling the model(GP2Y10) and found the sensor is an optical sensor.


Err...This is the Air Purifier thread leh...how come its not the place to post such question? Not trying to be funny here lar..I am asking because I am considering getting another AP and so am considering whether to get the LG AP instead of the Samsung AP.
I recalled that you did a comparison and the Samsung AX40 AP came out to be the (slightly) better option compared to the The LG AP because the Samsung filter is more readily available and can be bought from TB.
Hence if the LG filter can really be washed and re-used, then LG AP would have been the better option right?
Just wanted to verify the claims made in the marketing materials against reviews from people (such as yourself) who have actually used the AP.
Err...This is the Air Purifier thread leh...how come its not the place to post such question? Not trying to be funny here lar..I am asking because I am considering getting another AP and so am considering whether to get the LG AP instead of the Samsung AP.
I recalled that you did a comparison and the Samsung AX40 AP came out to be the (slightly) better option compared to the The LG AP because the Samsung filter is more readily available and can be bought from TB.
Hence if the LG filter can really be washed and re-used, then LG AP would have been the better option right?
Just wanted to verify the claims made in the marketing materials against reviews from people (such as yourself) who have actually used the AP.

Morning bro wuss
I ordered the cheap hepa from TB going to arrive soon, and also the cheap filterate sheets since I can't the 3M anywhere
You have prob answered this before, pai sei confirm again:
For living room fans mine are all the type where the motor is a bump at the back, so I place the hepa on the front and secure it somehow? (The product page shows people tying it to the back of the fan, but impossible for mine leh)
The filterate piece better to place on the back or the front?
I'm thinking some fans use filterate, some fans use hepa... Experiment a bit
Edit: I just realized that since the hepa I ordered is the loose kind that can be cut, I can cut into smaller pieces and still cover the back of the fan around the motor... Brain a bit slow, haha
Think should work right?![]()
It's another seller. The 300 x 300 x 25mm one that costs RMB26, some 百姓 HEPA, or common people HEPA.
The main factories manufacture more than 100 million HEPA filters annually in such a size. The production lines are massive. That's why can be so cheap.
China air purification is a 14 billion USD market, from a source that read.
Now they have standards and test labs/agencies to try to give consumers a good unbiased source of reference, else it got messy a while ago.
How did you derive this 0.023kWh?
Ok, I tried washing my Sharp 840/A40 HEPA just now.
It's a used one that I used quite a fair bit, that I kept in the storeroom, for unknown reasons. Sharp filters are not meant to be washed.
The water did not turn black, just slightly grey even after trying to "Destroy it in the basin". The filter is quite nicely used.
Hope that proves that HEPAs are not meant to be wash.
Even if you did not manage to destroy it, the PMs won't come out.
HEPA at the front of the fan. 3M Filtrete can be front or back of the fan.
But after reading the particle count values on that particle counting tmblr blog, the CADR of the HEPA + fan is pretty low compared to a proper AP.
Even the cannon is not fantastic. It is also quite noisy and very energy inefficient.
But during hazy days like these, it'd do.
I'd recommend the 3M Filtrete, it works ok. But not exactly cheap.
Qoo10 Daiso selling 5000gmd for 238 includes shipping

tats the cheapest i had seen!![]()