(((11.01.2020))) 年中华民国总统选举

[BeHappyLo]

live now!

 

[zoossh]

92 consenses is simply to agree there is only one China (country not ccp), both roc and ccp have different interpretation of what one China meant but agree there is one China

Maybe you should understand what everything mean before corping images and show you know nothing lol

On the contrary, you need to update your understanding

There is no consensus. China didn’t and never agreed to what kmt claim, but they behave so without officially denying kmt claim. The lack of open and official statement gave kmt the manoveuve even though reality speaks otherwise.

The failure of chinese infiltration in hk and tw led to an increasingly inpatient China who hence gave less and less ambiguity of China’s disagreement to kmt claimed consensus. To China, they did not agree that kmt can have a separate interpretation to what China means, ie no 各表。on the other hand, for Kmt, if no 各表 means no 92 consensus, no such thing as one China being taken out separately

This one sided love ends when Winnie made his statement leaving zero grounds for kmt claim of 92 consensus.

 

[cnt]

Who win also same

 

[BeHappyLo]

 

[Stealth_PL]

On the contrary, you need to update your understanding

There is no consensus. China didn’t and never agreed to what kmt claim, but they behave so without officially denying kmt claim. The lack of open and official statement gave kmt the manoveuve even though reality speaks otherwise.

The failure of chinese infiltration in hk and tw led to an increasingly inpatient China who hence gave less and less ambiguity of China’s disagreement to kmt claimed consensus. To China, they did not agree that kmt can have a separate interpretation to what China means, ie no 各表。on the other hand, for Kmt, if no 各表 means no 92 consensus, no such thing as one China being taken out separately

This one sided love ends when Winnie made his statement leaving zero grounds for kmt claim of 92 consensus.

Your English comprehension also fail ah?

Yes they did no sign any formal agreement. Both leaders explicitly endorsed the 1992 Consensus and agree there is only one China but their interpretation is different and ccp reject kmt claim and so did kmt reject ccp claim

Beijing authorities' definition of the '1992 Consensus' is 'one China' and 'one country, two systems'"

Kmt definition is ‘one China’ which the Republic of China (ROC), founded in 1911 and with de jure sovereignty over all of China.

But both agreed there is one China

Seriously you talk one big round but you only talk about the disagreement on the kmt claim which is also the point I mentioned in my previous reply and you say until I should get myself updated when you just simply reply me with the exact same point I made earlier

How come all this anti hgy people all cannot understand simple English de ah LOL

Unless you telling me now at this very moment ccp or kmt do not agree there is only one China than yes my point is outdated and wrong but is that the case?

 

[BeHappyLo]

Han team will humiliate puppet Tsai very soon!

 

[Kiwi8]

Your English comprehension also fail ah?

Yes they did no sign any formal agreement. Both leaders explicitly endorsed the 1992 Consensus and agree there is only one China but their interpretation is different and ccp reject kmt claim and so did kmt reject ccp claim

Beijing authorities' definition of the '1992 Consensus' is 'one China' and 'one country, two systems'"

Kmt definition is ‘one China’ which the Republic of China (ROC), founded in 1911 and with de jure sovereignty over all of China.

But both agreed there is one China

Seriously you talk one big round but you only talk about the disagreement on the kmt claim which is also the point I mentioned in my previous reply and you say until I should get myself updated when you just simply reply me with the exact same point I made earlier

How come all this anti hgy people all cannot understand simple English de ah LOL

Unless you telling me now at this very moment ccp or kmt do not agree there is only one China than yes my point is outdated and wrong but is that the case?

I think u need to improve your comprehension also.

Although China keeps harping on the 92 consensus, it is really no consensus. What is the use of each side's interpretation when it is clear that China will never accept KMT's version of the one China principle? China's version of the 92 consensus is always the whole China under the control of the CCP. That it itself is over the dead body of most Taiwanese. They will want democratic elections if there is to be unification of China.

 

[m0n0n0ke]

31st will see how new law work
Good drama of evil with power against peasants

 

[Stealth_PL]

I think u need to improve your comprehension also.

Although China keeps harping on the 92 consensus, it is really no consensus. What is the use of each side's interpretation when it is clear that China will never accept KMT's version of the one China principle? China's version of the 92 consensus is always the whole China under the control of the CCP. That it itself is over the dead body of most Taiwanese. They will want democratic elections if there is to be unification of China.

Omg... Read the context of that reply first, see what I am refuting the initial post for then come look back at what you write...

This have nothing to do with whether there was a signing for the agreement, more of saying hgy stance did not flip flop like what the initial post said

 

[BeHappyLo]

OMG.............tsai is reading script during 3 debateAGAIN

 

[BeHappyLo]

tsai is really stressed liao.

 

[BeHappyLo]

新潮流不倒，台灣不會好」

wa la...........Han is blasting away at DPP's 新潮流

 

[BeHappyLo]

OMG.........she is still reading scripts

 

[BeHappyLo]

新潮流不倒，台灣不會好」

wa la...........Han is blasting away at DPP's 新潮流

this is the best part of Han's speech tonite.........song la, a direct hit

 

[Stroganoff]

落跑botak kept repeating the same shiat like broken record from the first and 2nd debate. 草包

 

[BeHappyLo]

OMG......she is still reading scripts..........so she is only a puppet la.................

 

[BeHappyLo]

tsai attack on Han supposedly chauvinism backfired on her big time.....she lost to a 10month old female baby

 

[BeHappyLo]

tsai attack on Han supposedly chauvinism backfired on her big time.....she lost to a 10month old female baby

tsai cannot even stand up for a 10-month old baby girl

 

[pigpigoink]

Moi normal peasant watching the debate now. Feels like HGY debate performance not good leh, personally feels he kena left right up down from Vegetable.

 

[BeHappyLo]

wa la.........at the end, Han waved happily at the cameramen!!!