last year I returned 35%, a few percentage points above passive benchmarks, but nothing much to write home about. But definitely this year I'm considering switching to fully passive. Many years of doing active investing just to beat passive benchmark by a a few percentage points a year (and sometimes losing). Overall I've outperformed the indexes but only by mid double digits over the same time period. Just wondering if active is really worth it.
The MSCI world index has returned roughly 9% annualised over the last 35 years, so a "few percentage points a year" adds up to A LOT over a long period of time. An additional 3% return compounded over 30 years will more than double your total return, its definitely worth it if you can consistently outperform the indexes, that is unless you are spending all your time trying to beat the market.
