3DMark - Time Spy

[Koenig168]

This is really demanding. Runs like a slide show on my system. My GTX 690 is feeling obsolete.

(4790K at 3.6GHz, GTX 690 at stock)

[/URL][/IMG]

 

[FinalTidus]

Stopped using 3DMark since 3DMark06...

Surprised they are still surviving..

 

[Allanlee82]

This is really demanding. Runs like a slide show on my system. My GTX 690 is feeling obsolete.

(4790K at 3.6GHz, GTX 690 at stock)

[/URL][/IMG]

mean that it is time to upgrade !!

 

[raysusan]

is it free to test?

 

[ragnarok95]

is it free to test?

http://www.guru3d.com/files-details/3dmark-download.html

 

[Op_Valkyrie]

here's mine.... hehe

CPU same as yours... but using 295x2 (Crimson 16.7.2 Beta)

 

[raysusan]

http://www.guru3d.com/files-details/3dmark-download.html

thanks bro...so helpful as usual

 

[ragnarok95]

This is really demanding. Runs like a slide show on my system. My GTX 690 is feeling obsolete.

(4790K at 3.6GHz, GTX 690 at stock)

[/URL][/IMG]

3D mark is still not a real life tool representative. If you have reasonable frame rate on your game, it's still a pretty powerful card.

 

[hlots123]

http://www.guru3d.com/files-details/3dmark-download.html

currently timespy may need to run from steam ver of 3dmark...
i think standalone ver like from guru3d may not include timespy yet (like when i tried last nite/early morning)

 

[Tornesoul]

weird i thought you had to pay for the benchmarking software? guess im wrong

 

[hlots123]

weird i thought you had to pay for the benchmarking software? guess im wrong

oh yah i think Tornesoul is right, likely need paid ver 3dmark & paid ver timespy "dlc"

 

[Koenig168]

here's mine.... hehe

CPU same as yours... but using 295x2 (Crimson 16.7.2 Beta)

Rub it in ....

I didn't realize 295X2 was that much better than the 690. Maybe it's the async compute?

 

[Koenig168]

3D mark is still not a real life tool representative. If you have reasonable frame rate on your game, it's still a pretty powerful card.

Yeah ... I shall resist the 1080 poison.

 

[Koenig168]

For those interested, you can get 3DMark Advanced on Steam for S$10. It's the full version and includes Time Spy. Look under "3DMark". The Steam version does not say "Advanced" on the Store page but this is what you will be buying.

It's a good deal and this sale price is for a short time only.

 

[Op_Valkyrie]

Rub it in ....

I didn't realize 295X2 was that much better than the 690. Maybe it's the async compute?

its even better than 1080....

 

[tremor]

its even better than 1080....

AMD dx12 implementation is good. Very efficient use. Nvidia like bull just chiong only.

 

[Op_Valkyrie]

AMD dx12 implementation is good. Very efficient use. Nvidia like bull just chiong only.

ditto....

http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/7785/3dmark-time-spy-dx12-benchmarking-masses/index4.html

 

[Ferolare]

AMD dx12 implementation is good. Very efficient use. Nvidia like bull just chiong only.

Or we can still echo the fact that AMD DX11 is still no where near desirable relative to Nvidia's

 

[BlueSwift]

its even better than 1080....

But if the GTX 1080 is Overclocked though

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/15149

 

[Op_Valkyrie]

But if the GTX 1080 is Overclocked though

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/15149

I also running my 295x2 at stock now... haven overclock yet... lol compare Apple to Apple mah...