admin can explain why this thread was closed??

[jipbaban]

forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/eat-drink-man-woman-16/why-some-people-mad-about-jayley-5244017.html#post98285182

What's wrong? Now talk about jayley is taboo topic ah? Can't faced criticism ah? I believe this is an unfair closure of thread by a certain jmod! Admin I will appreciate if you can explain and put a stop to double standard that jmod are practicing!

 

[Shion]

Isn't it pretty obvious that thread starter is feeling sore for being banned...

 

[lyfeforce]

It is obvious what the point of that thread is. One can try and twist the words to justify but obviously targeting someone.

And we would do the same for any other member (close a thread unfairly targeting them), should they bring it up to us. We've done it before. So there's no double standard.

 

[Beh-Hawk]

nice work mods! that forum pest just kept spamming rubbish threads. glad that he is on the radar now

 

[jipbaban]

It is obvious what the point of that thread is. One can try and twist the words to justify but obviously targeting someone.

And we would do the same for any other member (close a thread unfairly targeting them), should they bring it up to us. We've done it before. So there's no double standard.

i get what you mean...but whether the ts of that thread is trying to stir onot, can the rest of us and the admin be 100% sure of his agenda? Are we of a higher being that him(a fellow human being) to decide all this? In my opinion nobody has the 100% assurance to be sure either, of course if someone is of a higher mortal being than a human i can say that higher being can judge and determine 100% whether is he trying to target someone or not.

Even judges can be wrong in deciding the final verdict of a case, isnt it?

 

[PetPet]

Hi there.
I'll lock the thread as well.
Well. I'm not 10000% sure of his agenda.
But it looks like he is indeed out to target someone.

Cheers!

 

[jipbaban]

Hi there.
I'll lock the thread as well.
Well. I'm not 10000% sure of his agenda.
But it looks like he is indeed out to target someone.

Cheers!

posting in feedback section is to prevent flames from burning at edmw, is to raise qns and doubts and for clarification. Now feedbacks also kenna closed. Well done petpet. Well done.

Not that im helping the ts whose's thread kenna closed. But now my feedback thread here also kenna aim, makes me really wondering how fair it is here. But nvm, you win lo...you are the mod what.

 

[Dragon]

i get what you mean...but whether the ts of that thread is trying to stir onot, can the rest of us and the admin be 100% sure of his agenda? Are we of a higher being that him(a fellow human being) to decide all this? In my opinion nobody has the 100% assurance to be sure either, of course if someone is of a higher mortal being than a human i can say that higher being can judge and determine 100% whether is he trying to target someone or not.

Even judges can be wrong in deciding the final verdict of a case, isnt it?

Since you put things that way, likewise how can you be 100% sure that TS is innocent.

 

[jipbaban]

Since you put things that way, likewise how can you be 100% sure that TS is innocent.

did i say ts is 100% innocent ? I already said im not helping him... is just that i feel that nobody(as a fellow human being) has the ultimate confirmation that ts is trying to stir?

Even judges cant be 100% correct in terms of their verdict.

 

[Dragon]

did i say ts is 100% innocent ? I already said im not helping him... is just that i feel that nobody(as a fellow human being) has the ultimate confirmation that ts is trying to stir?

Even judges cant be 100% correct in terms of their verdict.

Errr ok your feelings are duly noted.

I'm very glad that the judges in Singapore's courts do not require your ultimate confirmation to reach their verdicts. Just so you know, verdicts are reached based on factual evidence, not feelings.

 

[jipbaban]

Errr ok your feelings are duly noted.

I'm very glad that the judges in Singapore's courts do not require your ultimate confirmation to reach their verdicts. Just so you know, verdicts are reached based on factual evidence, not feelings.

Did I refer to judges in Singapore? I checked back, nope I didn't. Instead it seems that you like to assume. Since you like to assume, then I rest my case..not gonna indulge in this debate with you.

My purpose of this thread is just to highlight, how can we be more fair towards judging or determine certain users thread and posts. No name calling or derogatory terms were used. And yet you as a mod, now behaving based on assumption and putting words in others mouth?

Enjoy assuming then. Oh ya thanks for once again proving to us how "fair" things works here

 

[Perisher]

Did I refer to judges in Singapore? I checked back, nope I didn't. Instead it seems that you like to assume. Since you like to assume, then I rest my case..not gonna indulge in this debate with you.

My purpose of this thread is just to highlight, how can we be more fair towards judging or determine certain users thread and posts. No name calling or derogatory terms were used. And yet you as a mod, now behaving based on assumption and putting words in others mouth?

Enjoy assuming then. Oh ya thanks for once again proving to us how "fair" things works here

Firstly,
Dragon did not say you were referring to Judges in Singapore, Dragon is just glad Singapore's court do not require your confirmation to reach their verdicts. But oh well.

As for whether that thread's TS was aiming anyone in particular, it's not hard to see.

1) The gif is Ottoke's signature, that we are clear.
2) The most prominent member using that gif is Ottoke. That we are clear.
3) TS posted that exact gif. That we are clear too.
4) TS says 'put their photo like this will attract her come in this forum than know you meh?'. That's clear enough of who he is aiming.

5) TS says 'I find it now a days people are mad and always like to dream?

" AS IF " she is your GF like that .....

this make me feel more creepy If I 'm Jayley '
Pretty much stirring in progress.

If you disagree with the aiming part, do state who else fits the description above.
If you disagree with the stirring part, kindly state why those words are not trying to stir.

 

[runforyourlife]

Actually what i felt is the way the context is twisted seems to suggest or in fact, aim at a jmod with that signature (don't think there's anybody else).

If the context is more of 'Jayley is bad at acting right etc etc', there may be a case/discussion, but this one ji tao took aim at the user trying to incite a reaction using EDMW's help.

 

[Dragon]

Did I refer to judges in Singapore? I checked back, nope I didn't. Instead it seems that you like to assume. Since you like to assume, then I rest my case..not gonna indulge in this debate with you.

My purpose of this thread is just to highlight, how can we be more fair towards judging or determine certain users thread and posts. No name calling or derogatory terms were used. And yet you as a mod, now behaving based on assumption and putting words in others mouth?

Enjoy assuming then. Oh ya thanks for once again proving to us how "fair" things works here

Your comprehension ability is amazing. I did not say you were refering to judges in Singapore, I was.

So now you are saying that judges in other countries do not pass their verdicts based on factual evidence but on feelings. Do you have evidence to back this up or is this another one of your feeling.

Assume. Here you are assuming that I made an assumption. And what words did I put into your mouth? Is that another assumption.