[ADVICE] Investing with 5000

animeonegai

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2003
Messages
20,895
Reaction score
2,061
Where should I start?

My risk appetite isn't that high. Losing 10-20% is more than enough for me.

Another thing, should I use the money instead to start trading commodities and silver?

Pls advice.
 

kebinu

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2001
Messages
38,072
Reaction score
1,863
If you gotta ask, you gotta wait till you really start to trade.
 

Shiny Things

Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Messages
9,605
Reaction score
854
I'm going to set up a TextExpander macro that saves me from typing "advice is the noun; advise is the verb".

OK, if your risk appetite is not that high, you absolutely must not start trading commodities and metals - you'll blow through 20% of your money in a heartbeat.

Now that that's out of the way, a couple of questions:

1) Have you set up an emergency fund yet - six months' worth of expenses, in a bank account where you can easily get to it?

If the answer is "no", then do that before you even think about investing. If the answer is "yes", continue to #2.

2) When will you need the money? Will you need it for something within three years, or can you leave it in for more than three years (like, for retirement, or for a house purchase five years from now)?

If the answer is "within three years", stick it in a fixed deposit. If the answer is "three to five years", open up a brokerage account (at Standard Chartered), and stick it in A35 - the ABF SG Bond ETF, which is a fund that invests in Singaporean government and government-ish bonds. If the answer is "more than five years", open a brokerage account at Stanchart, and stick it in ES3 - the STI ETF, which is a fund that invests in all the stocks in the Straits Times Index.
 

frenchboxers

Banned
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
1,657
Reaction score
0
i would put 90% in high dividend yield stocks,singapore blue chip essentials or US index etfs.screw bonds,this is conservative enough.

the other 10% i would treat it as a gambling fund,just pop it in forex,or oil or penny stocks or whatever hot tip ur bookie just gave u.im not sure what it will accomplish.but hopefully u might hit on some miracle microsoft or berkshire harthaway stock and be a multi millionaire 20 years down the road.
 
Last edited:

sinkie4life

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
10,439
Reaction score
0
i think you would also be interested in asking WHEN should you start.

with major stock markets at their 10-year all-time high, do you really want to start now?
 

animeonegai

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2003
Messages
20,895
Reaction score
2,061
I'm going to set up a TextExpander macro that saves me from typing "advice is the noun; advise is the verb".

OK, if your risk appetite is not that high, you absolutely must not start trading commodities and metals - you'll blow through 20% of your money in a heartbeat.

Now that that's out of the way, a couple of questions:

1) Have you set up an emergency fund yet - six months' worth of expenses, in a bank account where you can easily get to it?

If the answer is "no", then do that before you even think about investing. If the answer is "yes", continue to #2.

2) When will you need the money? Will you need it for something within three years, or can you leave it in for more than three years (like, for retirement, or for a house purchase five years from now)?

If the answer is "within three years", stick it in a fixed deposit. If the answer is "three to five years", open up a brokerage account (at Standard Chartered), and stick it in A35 - the ABF SG Bond ETF, which is a fund that invests in Singaporean government and government-ish bonds. If the answer is "more than five years", open a brokerage account at Stanchart, and stick it in ES3 - the STI ETF, which is a fund that invests in all the stocks in the Straits Times Index.

Wow thanks for the wise advise! Even dividendwarrior supports..

i think you would also be interested in asking WHEN should you start.

with major stock markets at their 10-year all-time high, do you really want to start now?

No, its a inflated sum. but it is expected the bear is coming, but when will that be...? No one knows for sure. The tapering news is a cheer to investors, I don't know why...

i would put 90% in high dividend yield stocks,singapore blue chip essentials or US index etfs.screw bonds,this is conservative enough.

the other 10% i would treat it as a gambling fund,just pop it in forex,or oil or penny stocks or whatever hot tip ur bookie just gave u.im not sure what it will accomplish.but hopefully u might hit on some miracle microsoft or berkshire harthaway stock and be a multi millionaire 20 years down the road.

$500? hmm.. that's really hard esp I don't monitor my money constantly.

If everyday trade using half hr - 1 hour, is it enough??
 

le0nkelvin

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
262
Reaction score
4
Where should I start?

My risk appetite isn't that high. Losing 10-20% is more than enough for me.

Another thing, should I use the money instead to start trading commodities and silver?

Pls advice.

go stanchart open a trading account
they allow small size trading with no min
so u can buy some blue chip with $5000
 

animeonegai

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2003
Messages
20,895
Reaction score
2,061
everything is at record high, is it advisable that I should enter the market now?
 

hwmook

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2002
Messages
25,364
Reaction score
1,769
i would put 90% in high dividend yield stocks,singapore blue chip essentials or US index etfs.screw bonds,this is conservative enough.

the other 10% i would treat it as a gambling fund,just pop it in forex,or oil or penny stocks or whatever hot tip ur bookie just gave u.im not sure what it will accomplish.but hopefully u might hit on some miracle microsoft or berkshire harthaway stock and be a multi millionaire 20 years down the road.

Both are seriously lousy advice.
 

hwmook

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2002
Messages
25,364
Reaction score
1,769
everything is at record high, is it advisable that I should enter the market now?

Every economic cycle will end with a peak of 50-100% higher than previous cycle peak. The index is only breaking above the previous peak, there is still alot of meat to go before the drop but treading close to the peak also carry high risk of dropping over, if you cannot stomach the risk then its better for you to just invest in short term bond funds.
 

Shiny Things

Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2009
Messages
9,605
Reaction score
854
Wow thanks for the wise advise! Even dividendwarrior supports..

Advice is the...yeah, I probably had that coming, didn't I?

If everyday trade using half hr - 1 hour, is it enough??
It's too much. If you buy and hold and rebalance every year or so, that won't even take you half an hour a month. There are more important things in this world than money.

with major stock markets at their 10-year all-time high, do you really want to start now?
Firstly, what's a "10-year all-time high"? Is it different from a 10-year high, or an all-time high?

And secondly, we're talking about Singapore here. The STI's nowhere near its all-time highs, or even its 10-year highs.

US stock markets are at their all-time highs, sure, but that doesn't mean it's time to sell: if you think a new secular bull market started earlier this year when the SPX broke through its double top in the 1500s, it's probably going to go straight upward for the next decade or so. The S&P 500 bottomed out around 60 in 1974, then over the next 25 years it went up in a straight line by about two thousand percent.

In the worst-case scenario, if you'd invested the day before the crash of 1987, you'd still have made about four hundred percent over the next decade and a half.

Here's a thing that everyone seems to have forgotten after the shenanigans of 2000, and 2008, and 2011, and 2013 (in emerging markets anyway): markets generally go up. Sure, it's better to invest at 10-year lows than at all-time highs, but it's not a bad idea to buy at all-time highs unless valuations are epically stretched - and they're really not.

Both are seriously lousy advice.

Then give some better advice. We're all here to learn from each other.
 

frenchboxers

Banned
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
1,657
Reaction score
0
s&p went up 2000 points?thats probably cause fed took the US dollar off the gold standard and inflation went to hell.

between when was the s&p500 created anyway?

Advice is the...yeah, I probably had that coming, didn't I?


It's too much. If you buy and hold and rebalance every year or so, that won't even take you half an hour a month. There are more important things in this world than money.


Firstly, what's a "10-year all-time high"? Is it different from a 10-year high, or an all-time high?

And secondly, we're talking about Singapore here. The STI's nowhere near its all-time highs, or even its 10-year highs.

US stock markets are at their all-time highs, sure, but that doesn't mean it's time to sell: if you think a new secular bull market started earlier this year when the SPX broke through its double top in the 1500s, it's probably going to go straight upward for the next decade or so. The S&P 500 bottomed out around 60 in 1974, then over the next 25 years it went up in a straight line by about two thousand percent.

In the worst-case scenario, if you'd invested the day before the crash of 1987, you'd still have made about four hundred percent over the next decade and a half.

Here's a thing that everyone seems to have forgotten after the shenanigans of 2000, and 2008, and 2011, and 2013 (in emerging markets anyway): markets generally go up. Sure, it's better to invest at 10-year lows than at all-time highs, but it's not a bad idea to buy at all-time highs unless valuations are epically stretched - and they're really not.



Then give some better advice. We're all here to learn from each other.
 

genie47

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
27,508
Reaction score
47
Unfortunately losing 10-20% in paper value is something you gotta accept when it comes to investing. The very first criteria to investing is to accept risk. If you cannot accept this fact, then don't invest. This is the first most important advice I will give.

Firstly look at all these lazy portfolios. They beat the S&P500 but look at 2008 when the GFC took place. 20-30% down. But look at the subsequent years.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...WU1LN3Y4LU84SmNGUS1PMzdyQ0E&usp=sharing#gid=0

Why are they able to keep this up?

1. For an individual investor, don't leverage. Meaning don't borrow to invest. Markets tank, you hold your ground like the 300 with a glorious cry of "Let's dine in HELL!" and indeed they dined in hell feasting on the bones of the fallen investors who panicked.

2. The dining took place because they rebalanced their investments. The thesis of investment is still a gamble. A gamble that the instrument you bought will increase in value in the future.....or it may not. So one way to circumvent this unknown is to buy as many varied investments as possible. Varied as in different and not related. So lets take the example of the GFC. Someone posted a nice picture of gold being the best performing. Well, no. When Lehman went down the markets panicked and surprisingly the bonds are the ones that did much better. So everyone is clamoring for the sovereign bonds because there is safety in there. And gold too.

So if you at this moment have $100,000 and worked out a plan to buy some varied instruments and keep them at allocations come hell and high water, chances are you will perform just as these lazy portfolios did. So taking the GFC as the example again. If you are caught in that situation where everyone is dumping stocks and rushing for bonds which send bond prices soaring due to demand, you sell them some of your overpriced bonds and buy the stocks that they are so eager to get rid of even at a loss.

Read more. Learn but most important of all. That first advice stands above all. Do you accept risk? No? Go away and find a bank for an FD.
 

genie47

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
27,508
Reaction score
47
Part two

I suggest you start building a war chest. Fill it up with claymores, morningstars and battleaxes.

This is going to be hard. To actually budget an amount to be set aside and built filled to the point that when you open it up, you will have a hard time wondering if a the morningstar is too much for killing a mouse? Nah! I choose the warhammer. :s13:

$5000 is definitely not enough to invest at the current prices. You can only buy 1 lot of the STI ETF and after that you are quite powerless to invest in an equivalent dollar value of the ABF Singapore Bond ETF. Assuming you are going for the dependable 50/50 portfolio. 7000 seems better but then what about emergency money that forms that warchest?

Take into consideration your job, its stability, sources of credit and even a spouse. Then find out how much obligations you have including debt obligations. Plan for 6 months of emergency money.

For example, you credit standing with the banks is outstanding. You are in trouble and you can easily ask for 1 million and they gladly give it to you plus the Ferrari. Then you emergency money no need to be so big.

There is a big drawback to a big amount of emergency money. Drag.

Cash does not earn a lot in a bank. FDs can't even compete with the returns seen from investments. So there is a lot of discipline in this planning stage. Discipline in the mind to keep away from the lure of high returns from investments ignoring safety. Too much cash, lots of it sitting around doing little. Too little, disaster strikes and you are paralyzed. Plan and plan well because if the plan is screwed, everything is screwed.
 

rizhal

Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
8,057
Reaction score
3,543
Put 5k on CREE at Nasdaq and be patient.
You will thank me later :)
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top