For STI ETF,
1) Is Standard Chartered's custodian account considered safe as compared to other banks which links to your own CDP account? The main drawback is when stanchart uplorry, which is very very low possibility right?
2) Let's say if I have capital to buy 1 lot SPDR, is it more recommended to buy -
a) 1 lot (1000 shares) of SPDR STI ETF every 5 months (that's abt $600+ monthly), or
b) 2 lots (200 shares) of Nikko AM STI ETF very month (that's also abt $600+ monthly)
I read that SPDR is better than Nikko if you have the capital to buy 1 lot at a go. But does dollar cost averaging work for SPDR in this case where the shares are bought only once every 5 mths as compared to the monthly Nikko?
When you read that it is better, you need to do your homework and understand why people say that it is better instead of taking people's word for it. That is a dangerous thing to do.
As of now, in terms of vol as well as tracking error and the expense, SPDR does look to be a better option. But bear in mind the age of two, SPDR has been around for much longer, hence you see the disparity. But it's not so huge that Nikko is handicapped per say.
I would think if you can save up enough to buy 1 lot in 1 quarter then it would probably justify you going for SPDR.
If you have a strategy of rebalancing your portfolio every year, and from what I gather, since you belong to the group that has to save up for a few months just to buy 1 lot, you are better off going for Nikko. With 100 shares per lot it would be much easier to do rebalancing if your portfolio is pretty modest. If you can only buy 2 lots per year, it's gonna be real tough to rebalance.
Another advantage that I can think of for you in going with Nikko and investing monthly is that you would likely face lesser temptation to splurge the money away. You stash away 4/5 months of the money to buy 1 lot, then suddenly you see something shiny that catches your eye, you might end up buying it.